BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21) header
BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21) profile picture

Strategy Treasury Company • Financial Artist https://xitter.gq/t.co/ZFhTWLyR9w

Australia
Joined May 2024
Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)Photo by BitStrategy (@BitStrategy21)
BitStrategy retweeted
Share price down stream of BPS Process > Outcome
The verdict is in, and it isn't close. 🗳️ 61.5% of $MSTR and $ASST shareholders say SHARE PRICE is the #1 metric. Not Bitcoin per share. Only 18.6% picked ₿ per Share. That's more than 3:1. 1,398 votes, and the split hasn't budged since 1st hour. @Strive @Strategy shareholders want the stock to go up. 📈 Poll's still open, go vote 👇 @BritishHodl xitter.gq/GrainofSaltSF/status/2…
2
1
10
967
BitStrategy retweeted
Replying to @BigpictureBTC
Hey mate, very interesting! Many concepts considered there. To touch on my perspective on a couple (only): As a citizen, I see any individual or entity choosing to store wealth in Bitcoin as a step in the right direction. A positive thing. As an investor, I judge how efficiently a company can acquire it.  As an investor, the means of acquisition, I see as being of less importance than what it appears you do. Although, as a citizen, of course I see producing desirable goods/services as being of importance to society.  To consider means of acquisition, let’s imagine two companies.  Company A sells phones.  In order to acquire the material needed to make the phones, they need to raise capital. They do this by selling shares/diluting shareholders. Let’s say the money raised is used efficiently, the phones are created and then sold, and the profit is greater than the dilution that occurred.  The company uses the profit, essentially generated by diluting shareholders accretively, to buy Bitcoin.  In order to determine how efficiently the company created shareholder value via these phone sales, one would need to understand how much Bitcoin was gained compared with how many shares were introduced to the market.  Company B sells fixed income products.  In order to fund the dividends, required to fulfill their fixed income obligations, they need to raise capital. They do this by selling shares/diluting shareholders. The money raised is used efficiently and the profit from fixed income sales is greater than the dilution that had/has to occur.  The company uses the profit, generated by diluting shareholders accretively, to buy Bitcoin. In order to determine how efficiently the company created shareholder value via these fixed income products, one would need to understand how much Bitcoin was gained compared with how many shares were introduced to the market. If the phone company can generate greater Bitcoin gains per outstanding share, then they may be more attractive to investors desiring ownership of a company that can efficiently acquire Bitcoin. Said shareholders would agree to the dilution, as they see it to be efficient/accretive, but the moment they felt the company was behaving or performing less efficiently they may consider selling their shares.  If the hypothetical phone company was instead a Bitcoin development/infrastructure company, the efficiency equation would still need to be considered. Unless the investment was philanthropic, which would be admirable. This is not remotely similar to a citizen who doesn’t opt in to his savings being debased. Citizens are forced to deal with the consequences of inefficient spending/dilution, while shareholders opt in to perceived efficiency. In addition, individual shareholders can’t create more shares themselves as opposed to citizens who can take out loans, increasing currency supply.  As an advocate for Bitcoin, I’m happy if any company chooses to store their profits in Bitcoin. I personally see the company selling fixed income as being able to outcompete the (hypothetical) company selling phones, in terms of efficient acquisition of Bitcoin. This, of course, is open to interpretation and could change at any moment.  I also strongly believe in a free market and competition and am grateful for criticisms of efficiency which may hold companies to higher standards, resulting in better outcomes. For this I’m grateful, but while I believe in criticizing the efficiency of acquisition, I disagree with criticizing the means.
1
2
447
BitStrategy retweeted
Preview (work in progress - not the finished exhibition) BitStrategy.com/art
1
1
5
439
BitStrategy retweeted
The verdict is in, and it isn't close. 🗳️ 61.5% of $MSTR and $ASST shareholders say SHARE PRICE is the #1 metric. Not Bitcoin per share. Only 18.6% picked ₿ per Share. That's more than 3:1. 1,398 votes, and the split hasn't budged since 1st hour. @Strive @Strategy shareholders want the stock to go up. 📈 Poll's still open, go vote 👇 @BritishHodl xitter.gq/GrainofSaltSF/status/2…
As an MSTR or ASST shareholder, which matters more to you: a rising share price or growing Bitcoin per share-> if the stock keeps falling. @Strive @Strategy @BritishHodl @JoshMandell6
63%Higher share price
18%More Bitcoin per Share
12%Both matter equally
6%Depends on my time frame
1,740 votes • 2 days
58
12
7
300
28,915
BitStrategy retweeted
DIGITAL ROME
1
1
11
1,976
BitStrategy retweeted
“This year” The @Strategy opportunity is such that, over many years, in an environment where bitcoin grinds higher, MSTR won’t just be the largest holder of bitcoin. Rather, MSTR can be on a path to be the largest holder of everything.
5
3
41
2,871
BitStrategy retweeted
Elon, have a lot of respect for you, but bad time to troll. Please stop. Our SPCX shares (from our $500m investment in your Twitter takeover) are worth more than a billion. Would appreciate if you show a little support. Thanks!
4,899
3,367
2,788
40,944
10,012,751
BitStrategy retweeted
Binance has committed its own balance sheet to making customers whole. I expect it to deliver. Our industry will learn from this incident, strengthen security, and emerge stronger and more resilient.
Binance has begun recovering affected assets for users and continues to work with law enforcement, issuers, blockchain intelligence firms and industry partners to trace, freeze and recover additional funds. The company has already publicly committed to cover losses through company funds in the prior announcement. Binance has already reserved over $6.34B of company funds to cover this incident. $5B of these funds are already held in the exact token assets that were impacted. We are completing the purchase of the remaining amount by buying token assets through market channels and OTC channels. We are doing this to match the format of the remaining token assets and address any asset shortfalls. This step can take longer because some tokens may have low liquidity and OTC settlement also takes time. We will share more progress as soon as we can. These figures do not include frozen or protected assets, which remain subject to ongoing recovery and verification. Currently, $3bn has been frozen, with thanks to our industry partners. We are working with partners and law enforcement to recover the frozen assets.We will continue to use company resources to cover confirmed shortfall and will provide further verified updates as recovery efforts progress. Ultimately, all user funds will be verified publicly through our Proof of Reserves. We will weather this storm. Thank you for the support.
1,000
1,460
122
17,358
717,956
Anyone jumping on the bandwagon that $MSTR CFO Andrew Kang quitting on 7 days notice is a sign of turmoil or strife between he and management are low IQ individuals. Grasping at FUD straws. I’ve met Andrew, he is a very genuine individual of high character. I very much extend my sympathy to Andrew as I am sure the real reason is actually quite personal and likely he is going through some difficult times. When the real story comes out for why he left, you will not hear one apology from any of these individuals. Not one of them will do any self reflection.
19
5
192
17,778
Phong Le: "We think we can outperform what $MSTR did in the last bull market."
5
22
3
412
11,466
Saylor! YOU HAD ONE JOB!!!! WHY IS $STRC NOT $100 AT CLOSE?
8
2
121
5,701
BitStrategy retweeted
Thanks for the dip… bought some Bitcoin at $78,500!
1
3
74
1,734
Replying to @BitStrategy21
I have purchased 3 MSTR shares today. New Total MSTR: 425
2
1
15
557
BitStrategy retweeted
Join our Q3 Earnings Call. Today, 5 PM ET, live on X: xitter.gq/i/broadcasts/1dKrPrXyY…
5
5
2
68
8,513
BitStrategy retweeted
Our average cost over 52 transactions is now $167.34
We bought 19 MSTR shares this week. New Totals MSTR: 4,421 (+19) STRK: 500 Thank you for your support. BitStrategy Team
3
2
12
587
BitStrategy retweeted
It’s always been a fight for the #2 spot behind my 800 lb Gorilla Strategy👇 Fastest horse. Slowest horse. I’ll take the Gorilla led by Saylor and Phong. Mission Bitcoin is Mission Strategy. @zaidlikesmstr 2034🟠🍿
Replying to @Strive
@Strive may be the fastest horse. @Strategy will take you the furthest. Incredible episode exploring $MSTR downside risk and upside scenarios, management's missteps, the evolution of Strategy's treasury, and how its flywheels perform in a true bull market. John Lee Dumas of @MSTR_Today joins RE:Bitcoin. 🎥 Watch on YouTube: youtu.be/evfcFHzFVuo
1
2
13
1,016
That doesn’t make sense. 1 - you can invest in both MSTR and ASST 2 - you can acknowledge that ASST has a great setup to be more explosive into a nearer term bull run while acknowledging that MSTR has more steam to go further as Bitcoin does what it’s going to do over the next 10 to 40 years and beyond.
2
1
5
682
BitStrategy retweeted
Me listening to Strategy earnings call tomorrow with my 69 shares.
$MSTR Q3 Earnings Call.

Tomorrow, 5 PM ET.
25
14
447
10,274
BitStrategy retweeted
The MSTR Castle by @altols We did it. Satoshi released BTC into the world and, whether they knew it or not, they created a nearly perfect money. It's pretty much perfect when compared to our current money, at least. The analogy I’ve come to use that resonates most with people is: Clean water: BTC Unpotable water: fiat currency This drives home the point because the one thing we all need to survive in society is MONEY. In fact, money has become a prerequisite to clean water in many places. Yet, as citizens, you have no input on the government printing more money (selling debt). This phrasing helps people ask critical questions about what money is and realize how flawed fiat currency has become due to unchecked inflation and centralized control. MSTR (now rebranded as Strategy) is the first company to issue digital credit backed by the hardest money we have access to: Bitcoin. People have been talking about the moat of Bitcoin for over a year, but I’m not sold on that analogy. Instead, I see Strategy as a castle-like engine built on BTC, designed to be extraordinarily difficult to crack. As hard money begins to pull fiat currency out of the financial system, the entities that control the most BTC will have the most to gain. Strategy is perfectly positioned among companies to capitalize on fiat debasement with minimal risk. Strategy has transformed from a business intelligence software company into the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder, owning approximately 640,250 BTC as of October 12, 2025, acquired at an average price of ~$74,000 per Bitcoin, costing ~$47.38 billion. This represents over 3% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply. The company funds these purchases through equity offerings, convertible debt, and preferred stock issuances like STRC, STRK, STRD, and STRF—forms of "digital credit." For instance, in the week ending October 12, Strategy raised $27.3 million via preferred stocks to acquire 220 BTC at ~$123,561 per coin. These instruments give investors exposure to Bitcoin’s price without direct ownership, reinforcing the "castle" metaphor: a fortified structure built on BTC’s scarcity and resistance to inflation. While Strategy’s debt and equity are tied to its Bitcoin holdings, they aren’t always directly collateralized by BTC, introducing risks like stock volatility and dilution. Its Bitcoin-per-share (BPS) metric and Bitcoin Yield KPI (25.9% YTD as of October 12) highlight this focus, with holdings valued at $69.5 billion at a BTC price of $108,549 on October 16, 2025. This dwarfs its software revenue ($463 million annually), bolstered by fair value accounting, which reported $3.9 billion in Q3 2025 appreciation. There will certainly be companies that outperform BTC alongside Strategy, but it’s harder to analyze the risk profile of firms producing goods or providing complex services, dealing with intricate contracts or hazardous conditions. People spend lifetimes studying corporate valuation, navigating risks tied to operations and macroeconomics (like money printing). These risks don’t apply to Strategy in the same way. Its simpler model focused on Bitcoin accumulation avoids operational complexities. Though it does introduce financial risks: high volatility (beta 4) and leverage from ~$8.2 billion in convertible notes. A 30% BTC drop in March 2025 caused a $5.9 billion unrealized loss. Even today (10/16/25), among market uncertainty MSTR’s share price closed at $283.54, down 4.45% on the day. Still, competitors like MARA (53,000 BTC) or Riot (~20,000 BTC) hold less Bitcoin, giving Strategy a first-mover edge. Even the US government doesnt hold as much BTC as Strategy. They really do seem like they are in a league of their own. I believe we are near the endgame. Over the next 10-20 years, our generations will witness a transition from trustless fiat currencies to the verification and security of BTC and layered solutions as a dominant store of capital. Strategy ₿ appears to be best positioned to capitalize on this emergence of digital capital. "The endgame is we accumulate a trillion dollars worth of Bitcoin and then we grow that capital by issuing more credit" -@Saylor
3
2
1
19
2,771
There is no justifiable reason to buy $SATA over $STRC. Therefore, there is no justifiable reason to buy $ASST over $MSTR. It's simple math.
Investor Robin Seyr has doubled down on his conviction in MSTR following his interview with Strive CEO Matt Cole. His reasoning? Seyr: “I just follow common sense”.
8
2
16
2,805