JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1) header
JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1) profile picture

4th year Computational Neuroscience PhD candidate - focus in dynamical systems analysis and its role in real time error correction

Joined December 2021
Photo by JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1)Photo by JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1)Photo by JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1)Photo by JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1)Photo by JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1)Photo by JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1)Photo by JAMman ⭕️🐂 (@Bitcoinovercas1)
Polkadots JAM upgrade will enable one single wallet to interact with ANY type of smart-contract language ‼️ This means your one single Polkadot wallet can now interact with contract language like: - SUI’s Move contract language - Ethereums Solidity language - Solanas Rust contract language - Cardanos Plutus contract language Plus literally ANY and ALL other smart contract languages You no longer need separate wallet addresses, you no longer need to do XCM transfers between chain, you no longer need to wait for cross chain messages to verify…. One unified wallet will be able to do it all. This is because with JAM you can create a JAM service that can run and execute literally any coding language even (python, C++, JAVA) it doesn’t just end with one wallet being able to interact with any language… All of these languages can now run simultaneously and communicate with eachother instantly, without any bridges, XCM transfers, delays, or separate wallets. For example: in one single instance a Move contract could call a solidity smart-contract, who could then call a python script, which could then call a RUST contract, all of this happens instantly and all within one single block Polkadots JAM model didn’t just solve interoperability, it replaced it with a unified execution environment where literally any and all coding language can execute and communicate Importantly, separate Parachains or Blockchains can still exist in the JAM architecture. They will be able to keep their own token and keep control of their own run time and governance. However, to interact with parachains you will still need a separate wallet address, and will still need to do XCM transfer of assets or messages.
35
65
17
301
31,630
The only logical explanation as to how every other company caught up with chatGPT’s Ai capabilities so fast is because they all already had them. Open Ai was just the first company stupid enough to release the model to the public.
4
760
I’m convinced 95% of replies on X are bots This is why I stopped using X a few months back. Redownload it yesterday and the comments here are still by far the most obvious low level Ai model slop on any application Sad. See y’all again in the next bull cycle.
4
2
8
329
If you share the GitHub repository you used I will validate or in-validate your claims I vow to provide a truly unbiased analysis, vow backed the reputation of my PhD 🫡
The current Nakamoto Coefficient for Polkadot is wrong. Let me put it this way: if Polkadot indeed has a Nakamoto Coefficient of 178, then by the same logic, Ethereum should have a Nakamoto Coefficient of around 300,000 (yes you read that right). This is clearly wrong.
3
2
2
36
4,032
Crypto from 2016>2025 has been driven by individuals ‼️ Mainly because the technology wasn’t ready to handle any real word applications Loans and asset ownership are great. But they are computationally tasks, and few people care JAM is step towards meaningful computation
Polkadot is trading at $1.30. Its all-time high was $55. And yet: → 43 independent teams building JAM implementations across 15+ languages → 623,000 TPS confirmed in stress tests. Kusama hit 143,000 TPS at 23% load → 2.1 billion hard supply cap passed. First halving hits March 2026 → Native Solidity smart contracts went live on mainnet in January 2026 → 3,500+ developers contributed code in the past year → Gavin Wood, the man who wrote Ethereum's first client, is building full-time again The price says "dead project." The code says "supercomputer in progress." One of these is lying to you. I know which one I'm betting on.
2
5
41
2,368
👆Edit to post: Loans and asset ownership are great. But they are computationally *easy* tasks, and few people care
2
178
By far the best explanation of polkadots JAM upgrade is this video‼️ I have watched hundreds and hundreds of hours of talks over JAM. I’ve studied the gray paper extensively. And this video is by far the best explanation of the technology youtube.com/live/rSB8NeYvw78…
2
13
66
3,908
@danicuki I believe this is you ..?? If so, I’m sorry I did not credit you for this video!!
1
1
198
The dichotomy of science Scientists such as myself normally love the universe, and deeply appreciate its existence But being a scientist, especially a neuroscientist requires you to destroy life. Unprecedented amounts of life All to move the line of knowledge an inch forward
1
1
142
Criteria 4th year Neuroscience PhD candidate
1
117
People are Miss understanding Polkadots new EVM and PVM upgrade Polkadot didn’t “get smart contracts” in 2026 It got Gas costs that ACTUALLY reflect your CPU usage Instruction set speeds 10-45x that of Ethereum The ability to execute code in ANY coding language that exists
10
52
1,426
The first blockchain that can TRAIN Ai models on-chain will have extreme success Currently the cost and speed of compute makes doing this impossible However, Polkadot with its JAM upgrade is multitudes closer than any thing else Companies want to OWN their trained models
1
9
47
1,673
Outside these two things 1. government surveillance and governments using our online opinions to arrest people 2. Having money that cannot be frozen or taken What are driving factors that will push the general public to use decentralized systems over centralized systems
2
1
6
908
I love how a bunch of people who couldn’t create a calculator in Python are trying to tell the world that Polkadot is Vaporware 😅 Like okay buddy time to go back to your receptionist job and let’s the big boys decide what software is technically sounds and which is not
8
4
1
47
3,398
As a person who has no inner monologue and no inability to visualize things in my mind this post intrigues me With this method I can easily read papers for my PhD at 900WPM with total comprehension. While my normal reading speed is about 250 WPM I’m interested in yalls opinion
This is your reminder that speed reading is REALLY BAD for you. - Apps that flash words at you (RVSP) ruin comprehension - Suppressing Subvocalization messes up memory organization (phonological coding) - Peripheral vision "chunking" is biologically impossible
2
453
I remember my excitement when smart contracts first launched on Ethereum and I spent the preceding decade explaining to people their importance This feels the same way Needless to say I am excited to see what JAM has to offer the world Thanks Dr. Gavin Wood
It begins to feel like the Computer it is... @Polkadot #JAM
2
8
71
3,380
My belief is that the universe is trying to understand itself‼️ Making Ai and Quantum-chips the universes next step towards its goal If you zoom in close enough on a human neuron, an AI’s GPU chip, or a Quantum chip They are not only indistinguishable, they are identical
5
404
Most of the world doesn’t care about decentralization because the affects of centralization have yet to affect them‼️ And I think this quote beautifully explains this phenomenon, it also explains why there will come a time in the future when civilization begs for true decentralization “First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.” — Martin Niemöller
5
17
154
31,878
Unpopular Polkadot Opinion That I Desperately Want Changed‼️ Gavin Woods Proof of Person Hood idea is great and very much needed in the world But his 2 proposed Decentralized Individuality Mechanisms (DIMs) called Proof-of-Ink (PoI) and Proof-of-Video-Interaction (PoVI) are both inherently bad… I don’t think I need to say much about Proof-of-Ink (PoI). A randomly generated tattoo that you get on a random part of your body to prove your individuality I don’t think many people want to get some random tattoo, let alone one that makes that makes them extremely identifiable forever in the real word Secondly, someone could easily get ahold of your “special” tattoo design by taking a picture of it, and then simply get it on themselves and steal your individuality. This seems flawed all around. As for Proof-of-Video-Interaction (PoVI). This requires you spending 5 minutes per week playing some random game at a specific pre-scheduled time. I hate to say it, but I don’t see this ever happening on a large scale. People just are not that flexible or willing schedule something every single week forever. And because the proof of persona hood proposal has no outline of how these DIMs work. I am going to assume it uses facial recognition systems to verify each person playing the game. My issue is what happens when the facial recognition system accidentally deems two unique individuals as the same. Because this proof of personal hood is fully autonomous, the unique individuals who happen to have with overlapping “facial recognition vectors ” will never be able to obtain a proof of person hood, because the system will assume someone is trying to make a second identity and essentially lock them out forever. Again I would love to have my mind changed. Because proof of personhood is fundamentally important in the world. But I dont believe either of these two mechanisms are not the way to do it
13
3
3
65
5,005
Raise it to 100 Million Suck up all the new AssetHub Stable coin inflow 🤷‍♂️
6.2M HOLLAR in circulation 💵
3
33
2,644
Why Elastic Scaling ⁉️ Because not all blockchain applications or services need extremely high computing power Yet on all other blockchains regardless of how much computing power your application needs you pay the same flat fee Meaning non-computationally intensive services are subsidizing the cost for projects with computationally demanding services Elastic scaling however sells you the amount of computational power you actually need Need less computing power, simply pay less Need more computing power, simply pay more Its not that no one has thought of this, it’s that no one besides Polkadot can do it
Elastic Scaling is now live on @Polkadot 🚀 Introducing vertical scalability for rollups, enabling parachain teams to handle growing demand more efficiently and deliver a user experience very close to Web2 for end-users. Let’s unpack what this means for builders 🧵👇
2
6
56
2,509