Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd) profile picture

Veteran. Beekeeper. Biker. Love Staffies but now dad to two English Bull Terrorists. Was Reform but now flotsam.

North West, England
Joined November 2018
Photo by Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd)Photo by Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd)Photo by Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd)Photo by Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd)Photo by Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd)Photo by Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd)Photo by Bungle Rye (@BrianKnadd)
The only person responsible for Jason Arday's death is Jason Arday. He was a liar and a fraud who was rightly exposed for what he really was by academics and journalists who were simply doing their job. No one forced Arday to make up lie after lie about his life. He chose to do that. And he did it for financial gain and to bask in the applause it brought him. He used those lies to deceive people into giving him a job he didn't merit, a lucrative book deal he didn't deserve,  as well as fame and adulation he didn't earn.  And when he was found out, he called in the police and expensive lawyers to shut his accusers up, and his failed students who complained were branded as racist. Cambridge University and Jesus College enabled this liar by lauding him as brilliant when he wasn't even mediocre. They should ask themselves why they put their DEI religion above the need for fairness in their appointments processes, above the needs of Arday's students and, most importantly, above the truth. Arday's family and friends should ask themselves why they chose not to speak out to expose his lies which they must have known to be untrue.  The police should ask themselves why they thought it acceptable to investigate an academic and a journalist simply for asking questions about Arday's fraudulent CV.  The BBC and Arday's many other deluded cheerleaders should ask themselves why they were so desperate to believe Arday's outlandish claims in the face of all the evidence. The thousands of the great and the good in academia, politics, media and law who signed the Good Law Project letter backing Arday should ask themselves why, without any justification, they outrageously branded Arday's critics as racists who just wanted to bring down a successful black man because of the colour of his skin. All of these people made their own contributions to Jason Arday's life. And arguably all of them contributed in some way to his decision to take his own life when his fantastical claims were finally exposed for what they really were: lies. The idea that those who exposed Arday as a lying fraudster are to blame for his death is as laughable as it is outrageous.  The idea that Arday was "hounded" to his death is absurd. He chose to tell every single lie himself and he even chose to continue those lies in his resignation letter from Cambridge. He is not the victim. He is the perpetrator. The claim that Arday's downfall was only a front page story because he was black is also ridiculous. He chose to tell the lies that made him a front page story in the first place.  I feel sorry for those who loved him. It is very sad that he has chosen to take his own life rather than face the consequences of his own actions, which should have resulted in a criminal conviction for fraud.  But actions have consequences. This isn't about right and left. It's about right and wrong.
4,819
3,798
876
30,620
3,471,556
Bungle Rye retweeted
Can someone explain the far left to me? I simply don't understand them. #JasonArday #AnnWiddecombe
668
1,726
116
15,407
694,396
Bungle Rye retweeted
How do you feel about Halal slaughter, Ricky ?
“Animals don't have a voice. But I do. A loud one. I'm a fucking big mouth. My voice is for them. And I'll never shut up while they suffer.” - Ricky Gervais
523
1,796
65
27,764
1,997,760
Bungle Rye retweeted
Imagine going to the effort of emailing a lone female book shop owner, because you dont like her political leanings. What sort of pathetic inverted penis of a man would go to this level of effort, and for what? What did he expect to achieve?
“Enjoy being scared of everything”
11
13
112
3,196
Since Jason Arday, I’ve been thinking about getting into Cambridge, and what it meant. The culmination of years of headbanging hard work. Being a “swot” at school because I handed in homework instead of being popular. Yes, in a comprehensive the choice was that stark. Carrying Tesco’s bags full of books home from the library on the bus for weeks. Piling the books high to create a rampart around my single bed. Telling myself, “If you read all those books you’ll be good enough to get in.” Some of the books I read - all of Graham Greene - were not considered “literature”. Not of the first rank, dear. I didn’t know. As much Shakespeare as I could pack in - the big 4 Tragedies, all of the comedies. All of Austen, Forster (even Maurice FFS), lots of Dickens, Anna Karenina (devastating, wonderful). I stopped going to school because I needed to read more, much much more. To be good enough to get in. The Head of Sixth Form summoned me and said, “If you carry on like this you’ll fail your A levels.” Ha! She hadn’t got a clue. I was working so far beyond A levels. Besides, I had to finish all the books in the rampart. Time was running out. So hard, the entrance papers. Translating Proust into English. How? Then, a passage of George Eliot I recognised - thank you God! Then pretending that I’d read Oliver Twist when I’d only seen the film. I called it Oliver! in my essay. With an exclamation mark - how crass. But the dons didn’t know the musical, maybe. I don’t know. The only lie I told to get into Cambridge. Oliver! “All we ever get is groo-ell!” A really small, forgivable lie, I think, because the work of becoming good enough was so immense, so lonely. But the surge of pride when I made it. Good enough to get into that unattainable place. And now, we know that same Cambridge let in someone with two GCSEs - PE and textiles. A man who lied and lied and lied. They didn’t just let Jason Arday in, they made him a Professor, one of those scholars kids like me revered. We were in awe - imagine being taught by those great minds. Christ, Cambridge. What a betrayal of all of us who strove so hard to be good enough to deserve you. Who put you on a pedestal, who really truly thought reading hundreds of books was the price of admission, a price you willingly paid. So much for the brightest and the best. It’s so disgusting on every level, waving in someone utterly unworthy, barely literate for crying out loud. A man at the mercy of the English language, not its master and commander. A know-nothing Professor, a vacuous, fashionable fraudster hired to give lectures to kids like me. So Cambridge could look “diverse” and, in so doing, renounced its ancient power which made so many like me strive to be good enough.
568
2,128
176
12,493
508,322
So police know Ann Widdecombe’s horrifying death was not a burglary gone wrong. The suspect drove nearly 300 miles to Ann’s home ‘with wooden stick’. But he wasn’t “politically motivated”? What was the motive? telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07…
614
2,366
63
11,801
259,661
The BBC has issued an official explanation on why it has failed to cover our rape gang inquiry. 'Complex choices' are made for editorial and practical reasons. These choices 'should not be taken as indicative of bias.' Their words. But the BBC were very quick to cover malicious complaints against our inquiry, in an attempt to smear our efforts? They were then forced to later apologise about how they covered the story. So either the inquiry is worth reporting on, or it's not. They can't pick and choose. We're told 'complex choices' are made, meaning that efforts to uncover the industrial rape of young girls is not near the top of list. Let's take a look at a few stories on the main BBC news page, right now... 'Osaka pays 'love and respect to Japan' in Wimbledon kimono' 'Why £15 durians are being sold at half price - or given away for free' 'We had packed lunches every day for 10 years and retired at 40' Are these stories more important than the rape gang inquiry? I think not. You cannot hate the BBC enough. I expect no fair coverage from them, I've stopped expecting it. But the BBC is funded by the British people. Their continued suppression of our inquiry is a disgrace.
1,144
9,127
298
44,540
618,925
Bungle Rye retweeted
British men will travel the length of the country for ninety minutes of football, they'll spend thousands following their club around Europe, some will even fly to America for a game, yet many of the same men who tell me the boats are the biggest issue facing Britain won't spend a day in Dover making that view known. The boats aren't reading your tweets, they aren't watching your memes, they aren't remotely affected by another angry thread on social media. Every political movement that has ever achieved anything was built by ordinary people physically showing up. Imagine ten thousand ordinary people in Dover, peaceful, law-abiding, making it absolutely clear that they are unhappy with the direction of the country and expect politicians to do something about it. If people believe this issue is as important as they claim, then there comes a point where posting about it is no longer enough.
Nearly 1400 undocumented men have now entered the UK in the last five days with 186 crossing yesterday. More are crossing into Italy and Spain aided by NGO’s destined for the UK.
34
155
3
623
21,636
Bungle Rye retweeted
Super cool 🐦‍⬛and 🐄 ! 😂🤣 I can't even explain why I found this so interesting and amusing.
206
968
51
9,818
331,118
Bungle Rye retweeted
There's always a tweet, as they say.
1
4
1
18
551
There may be a new face at the top. But yet again they're choosing the Tory party first, and our country second. The Tories crashed the economy, and now working people are paying the price. We need a general election now. #PMQs
525
732
86
2,680
Charlie downs wants to rejoin the eu. You need to get rid of this clown 🤡 @RupertLowe10 he’s continually fucking up your message
Could you make this up? Charlie Downes wants to rejoin the EU. This guy is a total 🤡 After Lowe’s admission yesterday that he hates EthnoNats, this just confirms that Restore is a totally ridiculous party. xitter.gq/Decline_enjoyer/status…
461
275
56
1,767
252,785
There’s always a tweet…
945
3,853
174
20,897
939,101
More recorded evidence of two-tier policing this weekend in "Modern Britain". Watch how aggressive police are against this group of young white girls.
4,894
18,138
983
62,812
1,698,776
Bungle Rye retweeted
You’ll never believe who’s up campaigning for Burnham today…
352
165
114
1,952
399,166
MP @RupertLowe10's report is damning of @jessphillips, @NazShahBfd & the Labour Party. "Jess Phillips MP and Naz Shah MP maintained public silence on the ethnic and religious patterns of the gangs while their constituencies suffered. "Evidence shows Labour politicians prioritised avoiding ‘far-right empowerment’ narratives and ensuring so-called “community relations” over protecting victims."
9
128
2
310
3,504
I’m not even a Restore member or voter, but this is pushing me to join purely on the fact that this lady is a complete idiot. Wasn't she part of the Conservative Party that completely destroyed the country?
Have you asked yourself why his guns were taken away and yet other farmers are allowed to keep theirs? Have you wondered why someone as busy and as high profile as @ZiaYusufUK would bother himself to take such a step over a dog? Have you asked yourself, was he upset or was he bragging? Have you seen the substance of the complaint? I think maybe there’s a lot you don’t know, Orla.
26
46
2
260
3,348