what would be the scientific purpose of killing it? building @capitalcompany_ prev: cofounder @harmonic_ai | @stanfordlaw
Joined February 2013
- Tweets36
- Following1.8K
- Followers250
- Likes87
Bryan Casey retweeted
Largest round of skirmishing since the April ceasefire.
US struck 140 targets along Iran's coast. Though there were some reports of energy infrastructure hit, the target set appears to have been mostly military.
Iran launched its largest retaliation yet, attacking Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan; missiles entered UAE airspace but it's unclear if anything was hit.
Iran has declared the strait closed to all traffic; US and JMIC reject this, continue to coordinate ships moving through the Omani route (though with AIS off).
Bryan Casey retweeted
👋, we’re Harmonic. We make startups discoverable. Proud to announce on @TechCrunch that we’ve raised $30 million to date to help investors and teams source startups faster than ever before. techcrunch.com/2022/11/07/ha…
Bryan Casey retweeted
Harmonic helps investors query the startup searches of their wildest dreams tcrn.ch/3zQ1Jjh by @nmasc_
Bryan Casey retweeted
"No one has been able to offer a decent definition of robots and AI — not even experts ... if you’re reading this you’re (probably) not a robot, but certain laws might already treat you as one." -@marklemley, @BryanCaseyy @StanfordLaw papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
Bryan Casey retweeted
To regulate robots and artificial intelligence, do policymakers first need to know how to define them?
@Stanford professors @marklemley and @BryanCaseyy put forth an idea in their new article — “You Might Be a Robot.”
Bryan Casey retweeted
“To regulate robots, we’ll first need to establish what one is. As it turns out, this is not a straightforward task.”
@Stanford law professor @marklemley explains in a new article with @BryanCaseyy.
Bryan Casey retweeted
ICYMI — @Stanford law professors @marklemley and @BryanCaseyy have outlined a conundrum: how can policymakers regulate something that isn’t easily defined? bit.ly/2Fvm41G #AI
Bryan Casey retweeted
I am not exactly sure the lines have blurred between man and machine to this extent, yet or if they ever will, but there are interesting questions from @skominers via @bopinion bloom.bg/2HzIhwD
Bryan Casey retweeted
Is a drone piloted by a human a robot for legal purposes? What about a human driver who relies on route guidance from a smartphone?
@skominers discusses a new paper written by @BryanCaseyy and #TAPscholar @marklemley: bloom.bg/2JkTNi8 | @bopinion
Bryan Casey retweeted
You Might Be a Robot!!!
Or at least, we might not have the right definition for our rapidly evolving technologies.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
From @bryancaseyy and @marklemley
#SSRN #WeekendReads
Bryan Casey retweeted
“You Might Be a Robot” — In a new paper, #TAPscholar @marklemley and @BryanCaseyy demonstrate there may not be a “right” definition for the multifaceted, rapidly evolving technologies we call robots or #AI: bit.ly/2Ttsy93 | @SSRN
Bryan Casey retweeted
Regulating technologies like #robots and #AI, we first need to know what they are.
Rather than trying to find the perfect definition for robot and AI, policymakers should do as Turing: embrace their ineffable nature.
👉
@marklemley & Bryan Casey
robotic.legal/en/bir-robot-o…