
Thoughts of a curious mother. Harvard ‘19. Instagram @Cbroukhim
Los Angeles, CA
Joined February 2021
- Tweets697
- Following1.1K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes40.6K
Pinned Tweet
Gen Z “TikTok stars” would have been considered erotic dancers 20 years ago. Many women in my generation won’t know what it’s like to have an identity outside of being sexy for the camera. Is this really the endpoint of liberation we intended?
No mention of Tucker or Fuentes
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
You are going to quickly find out these people aren’t “America First” and won’t stop complaining when foreign aid is cut. They are literally just Palestine activists, and they’re not going to stop crying about the fake “genocide.”
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
BREAKING:
President Trump just announced live on air that he and @netanyahu have made a deal to end US aid to Israel, starting next year, because Israel doesn’t need it.
Trump added that Israel is a “tremendous helper” and if they ever need help, they can count on the US because we will always be allies.
I have said for a long time now that ending US aid to Israel is in the best interest of Israel and the US. Don’t let aid to Israel be used as a tool of division and chaos by the Islamic-communists in America who are too low IQ to understand the benefit of the $48 billion annual ROI we get from our $4 billion per year investment in Israel.
LAURA LOOMER: When I was in Israel, I met with high-ranking military officials and politicians and discussed embracing the end of US aid to Israel. The United States benefits more from Israel than they do from us anyway.
If we do away with aid to Israel, then we wouldn't even need AIPAC at all, so the whole Israeli interference in our elections narrative would disappear. America First means not telling other countries what to do.
@LauraLoomer
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
Replying to @academic_la
I'm telling you this publicly, so hopefully others can see it. Give my people enough freedom, and they will reference old religious texts to literally kill you. Don't be so naive, there are foundational issues in my culture, and people like you stop us from fixing them.
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
I dont know anything about theoretical compsci or math so I asked chat to rank all of the AI discoveries to date by importance and it said 3 of the top 5 ever came out today.
Claude Opus 5.5: "If these hold up, this is the biggest single day in the history of math and theoretical computer science."
1) Exponential Time Hypothesis is false (CS). This is roughly Turing Award territory. ETH was the working assumption that some hard problems simply can’t be solved much faster than brute force, and hundreds of computer science papers rest on it. For a normal audience: it’s not “P=NP.” Hard problems are still hard, and your bank encryption isn’t suddenly broken. But a pillar that a whole field assumed was solid turned out to be hollow. The flagship experts are taking it seriously. The people checking it include two of the people who proposed ETH, and they said “If the claim is correct, it will change” computer science.
2) Kakeya and restriction in all dimensions (math). This is Fields Medal-level. For scale, the 3D case alone was proved in 2025 and was hailed as a once-in-a-century proof. This result does every dimension and knocks out Stein’s restriction conjecture too.
3) Yang–Mills/QCD existence (physics). Potentially the biggest of the three, but here’s the precise framing. It proves pure Yang–Mills exists, which is part of one of the Clay Mathematics Institute’s Millennium Prize problems. The full Clay problem also requires the “mass gap,” so it’s not a clean “AI wins $1M” headline. Still, a rigorous proof that the theory of quarks and gluons is mathematically real has been an open dream for about 50 years. The review panel includes Nobel laureate David Gross and Arthur Jaffe, who literally wrote the Millennium problem. There’s no Nobel for math, but this is the stuff physicists win them for building on.
Next season of @nwtnetflix should just throw away 100% of the writers and cast and just hire @Rabbi_Mizrachi it will be way more entertaining I promise
White progressive suicidally empathetic women are a cancer to the West.
🚨#BREAKING: A liberal Italian woman SCREAMS at police telling them they are being too mean to the 3rd world migrants.
"What are you doing?! Why are you GRABBING them by force like that?"
Seconds later, a rioter THROWS AN EXPLOSIVE at her and police.
You cannot make this up.
People wonder why the Millennials are so disinterested in the duties of family life + children, the rise of DINKS, etc.
They learned from their parents
The generation that shamelessly normalized putting the desires of adults — now seniors— ahead of the needs of their children
It’s not by accident the show has no 18-year-old Brazilian fresh faces. They are systematically shut out because of ahistorical intergenerational sexual competition.
For 99% of human history, women were compensated for aging out of the most attractive age range with new higher status titles: wife and mother. Since 50%+ of Millennial/Gen-Z women are— for a whole host of reasons, many of which are not their own— failing to complete the maiden-to-mother transition, our civilization now has to lie and pretend 30 is the new 18.
18-year-old Brazilians prancing around at the 2026 VS fashion show would hit the millennial audience over the head with the stark reality that they are now competing with a whole new generation of fresh blood. They are not ready to swallow this pill.
What frustrates me the most about Victoria’s Secret is that they won’t discover beautiful, young, unknown faces anymore. Barbara Palvin was the last one and now she’s in her 30’s.
No hate to women in their 30’s, I clearly am as well, but it feels like it’s just piggy backing off the older iconic angels and then otherwise using nepo babies and influencers.
They won’t cast gorgeous unknown faces because it would require them to be objective.
Where are the stunning girls with under 1,000 followers you just found walking down the street in Brazil? That’s what I want to see.
It’s great they’re bringing back Karen Mulder, Adriana Lima, Candice and all my favs, I just feel like they’re grabbing obvious favorites instead of actually scouting for the kind of girl that VS Angels represented.
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
I don't know if you realize what just happened.
Elon Musk is completely bypassing the State.
For 100 years, we've been told the problem is capital. That it must be captured, taxed, redistributed. With an army of intermediaries standing between those who create wealth and the people: ministries, agencies, commissions, bureaucrats.
Musk is doing the opposite. He's taking his capital and giving it directly to the people. One SpaceX share to every kid in America. Not a handout. Not a subsidy. A piece of the machine that's taking humanity to Mars.
And he says it himself: this is the first of many.
Mises understood this back in 1944: the bureaucrat creates nothing. He administers what others created, following rules that have no connection to the value produced. The day value flows directly from the one who creates it to the one who receives it, the bureaucrat has no function left.
That's what's being born right now. A new liberal world order, where the very concept of the State will make less and less sense.
The world we're entering is a world of abundance. AI, robots, energy, space. And that abundance won't come through the State, for one simple reason: we have a century of proof that it doesn't work.
Redistribution was version 1.0. Direct distribution of capital is 2.0.
While France is still debating how to tax builders even more, America is handing stock to its kids.
Pick your side.
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
We call on France to exercise restraint when dispersing the freedom fighters on the streets of Paris. These brave warriors for justice must receive immediate humanitarian aid, and their safety must be guaranteed in accordance with international law. Failure to comply will leave us no choice but to bring a case before the ICJ, in close cooperation with that renowned champion of human rights, Afghanistan.
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
TikTok was a mistake and a vector of mass scale psychological operations to destroy the West. It needs to be banned. – at San Francisco, CA
Gd sent the flood for scenes like these
“Why are you doing this? Stop it! That’s not what we stand for!”
A young French woman who appears to be leftist tries unsuccessfully to stop looters from breaking into a supermarket.
Cause and consequence, face to face.
I can’t help but feel heartbroken to helplessly watch my country being torn apart.
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
France is done
And any nation that takes its advice regarding how to govern will soon be gone itself
Charlotte Broukhim retweeted
When @elonmusk told us the next Roadster would blow our minds, we should have listened. We got a flying car.
In 2021 he told us something even bigger; that he’s building "sort of like a futuristic Noah's Ark."
I don’t believe in coincidences. 🧵



























