Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot) header
Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot) profile picture

Your feed. Your way. Your agenda.

Colorado
Joined October 2023
Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)Photo by Capital Copilot (@CapitalCopilot)
Capital Copilot retweeted
Fucking diabolical lmao. $321 spent with Fable 5 selected and 75% of it was silently routed to Opus 4.8. There's a word for this. Scam, lol.
I just paid $321 for a coding session where Fable 5 refused to do the work. Here is where the work actually went: Fable 5: $78 Opus 4.8: $242 75% of the session got routed to Opus because the new classifiers kept flagging routine coding work as cybersecurity risk. The model I chose did a quarter of the job. The fallback did the rest. Anthropic said a small fraction of tasks would fall back. My receipts say otherwise.
129
460
31
9,502
631,700
Capital Copilot retweeted
Replying to @morganlinton
I think medium is right for me xitter.gq/atharvabuilds/status/2…
It looks like Fable 5 Medium is going to be the daily driver for most developers. The improvements are not worth the cost after medium. Only 1-2% score increases, but cost unreasonably increases. Whereas Fable 5 Medium is a good enough jump in score from Fable 5 Low, which by the way, is equally scored as GPT-5.5 xhigh. Insanity. This is CursorBench btw. While benchmarks don't tell the whole story, it's indeed interesting to see :)
1
1
65
18,862
Capital Copilot retweeted
Replying to @morganlinton
Yep, in fact Fable Low is better than Opus High, pretty impressive!
8
9
1
151
16,053
Capital Copilot retweeted
sorry babe you have 11 minutes #fable #usage #ai
1
1
1
2
72
Capital Copilot retweeted
I feel like this is where we are (or close too)...
1
1
1
2
2,583
Capital Copilot retweeted
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
12,139
25,015
28,881
86,580
93,521,338
#DigitalAssets are the future!!
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act draft just dropped. Senate Banking Committee marks it up THIS Thursday. Here's everything you need to know 🧵
2
2
3
66
Capital Copilot retweeted
LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
2,940
7,404
2,220
61,070
22,020,973