This is dishonest clipping. His argument failed because it rests on sola scriptura. If our church tolerates one national church having a minor difference in 1 deuterocanon book, it proves the church isn’t Protestant, since the early church for centuries had no single canon. The 7th council does affirm a normative canon from Trullo/Carthage that affirms deuterocanon. But none of that is a problem for a Church that accepts extra canonical Tradition, like elements of Book of enoch or Protoevangelium of James. So allowing extra canonical traditions aren’t a defeater for our position nor does it mean there is no canon. For Wood, not only is there no canon, he couldn’t list what the “Gospel basics” are.