Why is everyone silent about this? According to Geekerwan's test, early Chinese Android review units failed performance consistency checks. If review devices are specially selected or tuned, then customers who pay full retail price may not receive the same performance shown in reviews. That's not a minor issue. That's trust. Meanwhile, iPhone early units matched retail performance and retail units even improved later through optimization. Samsung wasn't included in that specific test, likely due to lower market share in China. This isn't Android vs iPhone. It's about one simple principle: If customers pay retail price, they deserve the exact same performance shown on reviewers' channels. Anything less? That's misleading. Reviewers gain exposure and money Companies gain sales. And the only one paying for both…is the customer who may end up with a lower-quality unit.