David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5) header
David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5) profile picture

Cancer biologist and recovering PI. Views are my own. RT does not equal endorsements.

Hershey, PA
Joined August 2018
Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)Photo by David DeGraff (@DavidDeGraff5)
David DeGraff retweeted
Vote for @montypal ! Can’t think of a more deserving cabs for @ASCO board
Voting for the ASCO Election is now open. I am honored to be running as one of the candidates for the ASCO Board. Visit asco.org/election to learn more about the candidates and place your vote!
1
8
33
1,240
Join BCAN Bladder Cancer Matters podcast host Rick Bangs and Dr. David McConkey of @UR_Med on Oct. 22 at noon ET for a webinar on bladder cancer in New York State, treatment advances and patient resources.
1
4
9
478
David DeGraff retweeted
A great read for any of you interested in bladder cancer, nmibc, the nuances of clinical trials and why they matter
It has been nearly 5 months since the FDA approved durvalumab + BCG for “BCG-naïve” high-risk #NMIBC based on the POTOMAC trial. There has been considerable discussion about the discordant results of the recent phase III trials evaluating BCG + immune checkpoint blockade. But I think we're overlooking a potentially important difference between these trials, one that could have major implications for how we interpret the results and counsel our patients. POTOMAC and CREST were positive trials, but unlike the negative ALBAN trial, both permitted enrollment of patients previously treated with BCG. To my knowledge, neither has reported how many patients had prior BCG exposure or whether the benefit of adding checkpoint blockade differs between previously treated and truly BCG-naïve patients. Given the additional toxicity, treatment burden, and cost of systemic checkpoint blockade, how can we adequately counsel patients receiving BCG for the first time without knowing the magnitude of benefit specifically in patients like them? I think we need to see these subgroup data from @AstraZeneca and @pfizer . 1/n @BladderCancerUS ; @BCAN_Research ; @SUO_YUO ; @UroOnc ; @FDA ; @chana_weinstock ; @AmerUrological
5
31
1,302
David DeGraff retweeted
Congrats to all authors that contributed chapters to our book on the major complication of pelvic surgery in female pts. Doody's Review provided it with a rare 5 Star review. Useful to all pelvic surgeons. @UrologyMSK @UroOnc @AmerUrological @SGO_org link.springer.com/book/10.10…
4
5
30
1,808
David DeGraff retweeted
Thank you to @BladderCancerUS for this support! The UCSF K12 from the NCI went unfunded in 2025 with several junior faculty already in the program. Foundations like BCAN make all the difference in steadying the waters in an uncertain federal funding landscape.
“This support will allow me to sustain the momentum of my laboratory, continue pursuing promising new discoveries, and bridge a critical funding gap.” Congratulations to 2026 BCAN Continuity Grant recipient @CChuMD!
1
5
35
2,240
David DeGraff retweeted
Ever wonder how heterogeneity defines bladder cancer subtypes? Ha and Hsieh Lab postdoctoral fellows @pushpa_itagi and Samantha Schuster @fredhutch did, leading to a deep study of bladder cancer clonality, evolution, and heterogeneity published @Nature nature.com/articles/s41586-0…
13
57
13
171
39,034
David DeGraff retweeted
Incredibly proud of my amazing wife on the launch of her major project. The stuck point - you do not outgrow the need to be human. The stuck point shows you the map of your suffering so you can stop self blame and start healing. #thestuckpoint #sulf #mentalhealth #therapy
1
1
21
730
David DeGraff retweeted
Important work on small cell bladder cancer ADC targets @Markuseckstein3
Small cell carcinoma of the bladder: why ADC targets from conventional UC do not simply carry over, and what may work instead 🧵 New in @Histo_Journal: 88 SmCCB from Milan and Erlangen, 79 fully profiled by IHC for ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, YAP1, HNF4α, NE and tuft cell markers, plus 7 therapeutic targets and NECTIN4 FISH. 🔬 Two phenotypes 🟢 High-NE (57/79): ASCL1-driven, NEUROD1-driven or mixed, diffuse synaptophysin, chromogranin and CD56 🟠 Low-NE (22/79): POU2F3-driven, YAP1-driven or TF-negative, weak or absent NE markers, significantly associated with admixed urothelial, glandular or squamous histology 🎯 ADC and BiTE targets, one by one Nectin-4 (membranous) • Completely negative in 75% (60/80) • Median H-score 0, mean 11.6, max 220 • Higher in Low-NE than High-NE (median 1.5 vs 0, P<0.001), consistent with retained urothelial differentiation NECTIN4 amplification (FISH) • 16/73 (21.9%), a frequency comparable to conventional UC • No difference between High-NE and Low-NE (P=0.835) • No association with membranous protein (P=0.099) TROP2 • Completely negative across the cohort HER2, FOLR1, Claudin 18.2 • Rare and weak expression only DLL3 • Positive in 35/43 evaluable High-NE cases (81%) • Nearly absent in Low-NE (P<0.001) • Relevant for DLL3-directed BiTEs such as tarlatamab and for DLL3 ADCs in development SLFN11 • Median H-score 125, significantly higher in High-NE (P=0.006) • Supports testing DNA-damaging strategies in this group 💡 Key takeaways 1️⃣ High-NE SmCCB is largely Nectin-4 protein negative, yet carries NECTIN4 amplifications at rates similar to conventional UC. The amplification is present, the protein is not. 2️⃣ Our hypothesis: this points to NE transdifferentiation from a urothelial precursor that already harboured the amplification. The gene status is retained, while the urothelial protein program, including Nectin-4, is switched off during lineage change. The equal amplification rate in both phenotypes fits this model. It needs confirmation in paired and clonal analyses. 3️⃣ Practical consequence: NECTIN4 FISH alone should not be read as a surrogate for target presence in SmCCB. Gene status and membranous protein both need to be assessed. 4️⃣ Enfortumab vedotin benefit cannot be assumed in High-NE SmCCB. Low-NE tumours with residual urothelial features remain the more plausible candidates for UC-type ADCs. 5️⃣ High-NE SmCCB behaves biologically like SCLC: DLL3-high, SLFN11-high. This makes it a rational population for SCLC-directed strategies. 6️⃣ A tuft cell-like subset exists: POU2F3-driven tumours co-express POU2AF2 (11/16) and ChAT (13/16), with preclinical mSWI/SNF vulnerabilities. 7️⃣ A simple workflow (NE markers ± TF panel) can stratify SmCCB in routine diagnostics today. ⚠️ Limits: retrospective, TMA-based, no treatment or outcome annotation. Treatment-annotated and paired pre/post-therapy cohorts are the next step. Big shout out to Nazario Tenace from San Raffaele he drove this work as fellow. Bright future for this talented pathologist. Shout out also at great collaborators from Sann Raffaele @AndreaNecchi @Albert0Briganti @F_Montorsi and @mauriziocollechia @maurilioponzoni @claudiodoglioni and @UroMoschini Great collaboration between San Raffaele Milan and UK Erlangen, led by Nazario Tenace, with @andreanecchi 🔗 doi.org/10.1111/his.70284
9
23
2,712
Celebrating 20 yrs of @IBCG_BladderCA! Thanks @UroDocAsh for a memorable #IBCG26 and congratulations on IBCG’s tremendous growth & global impact. What makes this group special is our willingness to tackle difficult & controversial topics with openness, rigor and friendship to build consensuses that help guide the global bladder cancer community. Grateful for your leadership, mentorship, friendship and proud to serve on the Board. Here’s to the next 20! 🌎🎉
20 years ago, IBCG started with a small group around a table. Later this month, friends and colleagues from around the world gather in Houston for #IBCG26. Two days around the table tackling some of the hardest questions in #BladderCancer, debating the evidence and challenging each other on where we go next. Looking forward to seeing you all! @UrogerliMD @spsutkaMD @LAUrology_NL @shilpaonc @mouwlab @pjhensley11 @AndreaNecchi @AmirHorowitz @PGrivasMDPhD @karima_oualla @SimaPorten @joanfundi @marigfern
12
1
50
4,537
Delighted to welcome Phil Spiess to the IBCG Board as our inaugural GSRGT Liaison. This new role will help deepen collaboration between IBCG and the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors, with a focus on areas of shared scientific and strategic interest. Looking forward to what we can build together. @GTumors @UrogerliMD @pjhensley11 @AmirHorowitz @mouwlab @spsutkaMD @shilpaonc @AndreaNecchi @LAUrology_NL @karima_oualla @PGrivasMDPhD @marigfern @SpiessPhilippe @IBCG_BladderCA #IBCG26
4
9
4
51
4,866
David DeGraff retweeted
Enjoyed being on the @Uromigos 🎙️podcast! Thanks @brian_rini @tompowles1 for the great conversation we had about investigator-initiated clinical trials. We discussed our journey from cell lines to a completed investigator-initiated clinical trial! #CLONEVO . We reminisced about how it all started at the @AACR @ASCO methods in clinical trials research workshop until the results were presented at AACR/ASCO annual meetings! #FaltasLab bit.ly/3S2wUUR Listen to the full episode 🎧here: bit.ly/4huuMzz
2
13
33
2,199
David DeGraff retweeted
Congratulations @DrScottTagawa and team @WCMGUcancer!
👏👏@DrScottTagawa and the entire #PSMAddition team on this 👍 @TheLancet ! A landmark ph 3 trial of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 in PSMA-positive #mhspc #mAPMN/S thelancet.com/journals/lance… #fdaapproved @WCMGUcancer @cnsternberg @FaltasLab
3
9
1,908
Just released in @NatRevUrol : Integrating clinically actionable biomarkers into bladder cancer care : recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group @IBCG_BladderCA During our deliberations, one theme was clear: biomarkers don't improve care simply because they're "novel or new" They improve care when they're validated, reproducible, and actually change clinical decisions 🧵 @pjhensley11 @jteoh_hk @UrogerliMD @shilpaonc @LauraBukavinaMD @mouwlab @AndreaNecchi @niyatilobo @Agarwal_CaB @LiangChengMD @karima_oualla @drtanws @MaxKates @BrigidaMaiorano @h_alahmadie @TomFlaigMD @AmirHorowitz @WesKassouf @djmcconkey @JanetKukreja @LAUrology_NL @carme_mir1 @UroMoschini @BogdanaSchmidt @VigneshPackiam
5
38
6
78
14,863
David DeGraff retweeted
Grateful for the opportunity to share our research with colleagues and friends, all united by a common goal and brought together by @BladderCancerUS #BCANTT26 was one for the books for the #FaltasLab with trainees @MHosmanMD @mark_farha giving excellent presentations and @Rahul_RaSingh & @jaekwonkim49373 awarded Young Investigator awards. Grateful for the support and the collaborative spirit. Returning energized, full of new ideas and excited to continue our work to benefit patients with #BladderCancer everywhere.
6
12
1
33
3,606
Is there anything he can't do???
With the @FIFAWorldCup fresh in everyone’s minds, I present to you this age-matched photo of #Messi & @PGrivasMDPhD. Is it possible everyone’s favorite GU oncologist was on the pitch today?
1
2
410
David DeGraff retweeted
Very proud of my postdoc @JaekwonKim49373 who received a BCAN Young Investigator Award #FaltasLab @WCMGUcancer @WCMDeptofMed @WeillCornell. Thanks to @BladderCancerUS @BCAN_Research for supporting our #bladdercancer research
Meet BCAN Young Investigator Awardee @JaekwonKim49373 of @WeillCornell. “This award will support my research investigating how environmental carcinogens drive APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis in bladder cancer. I am deeply grateful to BCAN for supporting early-career investigators and advancing research that may ultimately improve prevention and treatment strategies for bladder cancer patients.”
3
5
28
2,219
David DeGraff retweeted
🔥 Published today, and just in time for summer conferences, here are your guidelines for presenting badly
34
430
32
1,626
149,811