Damien (@Dleindrive) header
Damien (@Dleindrive) profile picture

6+4+3=2, Go fast and turn left and sometimes right. Dodgers, Colts, Lakers, ScoDucks, GeauxTigers. @batflippodcast @BFEntertain_

Los Angeles, CA
Joined March 2012
Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)Photo by Damien (@Dleindrive)
Hang it in the louvre
10
2,111
Damien retweeted
Exposing MLB's "Everyone Wins" Proposal
Baseball fans have repeatedly told us they have two issues with the game today: blackouts and fairness We’re proposing to make three major changes to baseball: 1. Entering into a partnership with players where all revenues that are generated are split 50/50 between the teams and the players 2. Implementing a salary cap and floor that will regulate what each team can spend 3. Revenues from media generated in baseball are shared equally by the clubs This will reduce the revenue disparity in baseball and help us address local blackouts Major League players’ total compensation would go up and fans would get a more competitive game It’s a win for everybody
30
187
11
985
114,824
I spent a lot of money on season tix & no one from @MLB asked me what matters to me. You know what does: - Keeping baseball on the field & not using fans as a CBA negotiating pawn - Not wasting time pushing a cap that players won't accept - Fix loopholes like deferred money & sandbagged TV deal evaluations to increase CBT $ - Find level techniques that aren't a cap: 2nd apron, increased penalties for going WAY over. *fixing loopholes does this too - Acknowledge that giving cheap owners more $ doesn't mean they will spend it.
Baseball fans have repeatedly told us they have two issues with the game today: blackouts and fairness We’re proposing to make three major changes to baseball: 1. Entering into a partnership with players where all revenues that are generated are split 50/50 between the teams and the players 2. Implementing a salary cap and floor that will regulate what each team can spend 3. Revenues from media generated in baseball are shared equally by the clubs This will reduce the revenue disparity in baseball and help us address local blackouts Major League players’ total compensation would go up and fans would get a more competitive game It’s a win for everybody
28
27
3
198
27,229
A lockout is not a strike, this situation is not the MLBPA's fault.
59
141
10
1,267
76,267
MLB has issues it needs to correct in terms of spending, but once again, a salary cap will not fix that. The Yankees and Dodgers should spend more because they generate more money. Popular teams in big markets should be able to put as much $$ back into their club. If a fan is spending money on their team at least there's some ROI rather than seeing the owner pocket it. The Blue Jays are a great example. The building is full and the club is spending record $$ on payroll. With a cap, the building will have the same attendance, but that $$ goes somewhere else. The highest level of sport doesn't need an equal playing field. This is professional sports.
Baseball fans have repeatedly told us they have two issues with the game today: blackouts and fairness We’re proposing to make three major changes to baseball: 1. Entering into a partnership with players where all revenues that are generated are split 50/50 between the teams and the players 2. Implementing a salary cap and floor that will regulate what each team can spend 3. Revenues from media generated in baseball are shared equally by the clubs This will reduce the revenue disparity in baseball and help us address local blackouts Major League players’ total compensation would go up and fans would get a more competitive game It’s a win for everybody
71
3
5
64
20,964
Replying to @MLB
This is comically bad. They’re being very careful and selective of what they’re saying/showing and how they’re delivering it. This is going to be ugly if they’re trying to sway fan/public support weeks before they even lock us out. At the end of the day- they want to drive down salaries and put more money in the pockets of billionaires. Nobody wins except them. Simple as that. It’s not about competition. It’s never been about competition for them, it just is a nice cover up.
660
1,206
168
11,412
896,015
LFG
Larson family affair at the Tulsa Shootout 👀🔥 #Shootout2027
69
Don’t you dare do this to me
Said this on the pod a few days ago Do not be surprised Colts nation…
1
1
96
Good pit reporter just a terrible play by play broadcaster
.@FoxSports' Jamie Little says she will step away from the NASCAR broadcast booth next year but continue as a pit reporter for NASCAR and IndyCar coverage.
2
58
I think I’ve seen this about 100x over the 24 hours. The Colts do NOT save $38M with a post-June 1st designated cut of Daniel Jones. It pushes the majority of the cap hit to 2028 instead of 2027. I’d argue this doesn’t help at all. 2028 should be their target to build again.
Replying to @MyColtsAccount
The Colts save $38 mil on the cap with a post-June 1st designated cut in the offseason as opposed to $10 mil cap saving by trading/cutting pre-June 1st.
2
5
1
27
3,697
Great pick! Absolutely deserved
Sal Stewart is the 2026 NL Jackie Robinson Rookie of the Year!
35
BREAKING: The College Football Playoff and ESPN have agreed on a five-year deal that will expand the field to 24 teams in 2027, @CFBHeather reports. on3.com/news/college-footbal…
30
Will trade Nelson but won’t trade DJ because he prepares well. LMFAO
The Colts informed QB Daniel Jones on Saturday they’re not trading him by Tuesday’s deadline, sources tell @ringer @netflixsports. Teams called and the Colts listened. But they never had any intention of moving him. Despite speculation, Jones is staying in Indy.
4
1
1
43
996
With the owners' new proposal, it's time to run update my net increase/decrease analysis for player salaries. It assumes a 4% increase in salary year over year to match historical trends and that luxury tax penalty payments to players go away. Net -$457 million to players
5
32
15
147
27,435
Because it doesn’t. Every team as it is gets about 120-150 million from the league without considering the fact of their 52% of local revenue. Every owner can spend more without a cap or a rev share change but they don’t want to.
Because lack of better revenue sharing prevents it... Not sure how this simple concept is ignored by so many
2
78
MLB Owners are literally telling you they can spend more money they just choose not to! Please don’t fall for the Dodgers are ruining the game we need a cap bullshit. Make luxury tax penalties more strict, fix deferral bullshit
44
18
1
106
4,358
Or hear me out. 12 teams raise payrolls to said amount you admitted they can run and BOOM 636M payroll increase!
Replying to @MLB
Projected cap and floor in 2028 vs. 2026 payroll
9
2
5
1,406
Owners proposing a 180 mil floor now is LMAO. Why don’t you just spend that now????
News: MLB made a new salary-cap proposal today. The league now wants it to start in 2028, rather than 2027. The league is proposing a $180.2 million floor and $258.2 million cap for 2028.
65
2
5
33
8,227