Illustration Professor. Also Visdev/illustrator on @wingfeathersaga Animated Series! Tweet fighter 2. Hubby/Dad. Draws stuff, ❤️’s Jesus. He/Him (2 make U mad).
✈️ USSR Round 1 tweet
Joined July 2011
- Tweets20.9K
- Following1.2K
- Followers897
- Likes21.6K
Pinned Tweet
My nephew and I having a sketch session. He was still sketching (pictures of capybaras) right up to the very end. He was starting to get pretty good. The world is poorer for his loss, he was a great kid, and we miss him dearly.
Christopher Doehling retweeted
These men showed up in this little market and grabbed the owner for no reason and if you notice they’re dressed in plain clothes with no Identification! They threw him to the ground as a Combat Vet shopping there calls the police on them! There was no warrant and he was a Citizen
Christopher Doehling retweeted
I think I come in a little hot sometimes with AI, and I should do better, but I just want to note that I posted this on FB almost 3 years ago on Dec 1, 2022.
It's theft.
It's always been theft, and we're just so tired.
Christopher Doehling retweeted
Actual Christians should have nothing to do with Christian Nationalism. Stop making excuses for it and rubbing elbows with it. Enough! It is an abomination, and should earn our censure, not our tacit affirmation.
Christopher Doehling retweeted
Where in the Immigration and Nationality Act does it say that US citizens have to prove that they're citizens or else be arrested?
Let your yes be yes and your no be no.
Plausibly deniable? Not on this show.
Stephanopoulos: Did Homan keep the money or give it back?
Vance: He did not take a bribe…
Stephanopoulos: Are you saying he did not accept the $50,000?
Vance: I’m sure that in the course of his life he has been paid more than $50,000 for services. The question is did he do something illegal.
Stephanopoulos: I’m asking if he accepted the $50,000
Vance: Did he accept $50,000 for what? Is it illegal to take a payment for doing services? Low income women can’t get food because of the Democrats.
Stephanopoulos: I asked you whether Tom Homan accepted $50,000 as was heard on a audiotape recorded by the FBI in September 2024. You didn’t answer the question.
Vance: No, I said—
*Feed cuts out*
Christopher Doehling retweeted
IN A LATE NIGHT POST, TRUMP DOES NOT REMEMBER WHO WAS PRESIDENT ON JAN 6, 2021 (HE WAS), WEIRDLY SHOUTS “DO SOMETHING” (LIKELY AT CLOUDS). HIS MENTAL ISSUES ARE VERY BAD!
Christopher Doehling retweeted
Hollywood concept artist of 18 years here, many of us have tinkered with AI and hate it because it's exploitative and lazy and destroying our livelihoods. You're a YouTuber with toys and affiliate links who pivoted to AI from music three years ago to make ad dollars.
Christopher Doehling retweeted
AI software can't do what you're claiming.
And AI software research started officially at Dartmouth in 1956 but the formal reasoning research behind it started in the 1200's with the work of Ramon Lull.
If that's too much of a stretch for you - let's go back up to 1956, when Newell, Simon and Shaw wrote Logic Theorist, the first program designed to reason.
But hey, why not ignore how long AI software has been in development and just agree it's more than "a year".
What game are you thinking about? Pong? Space Invaders?
Space Invaders took one person, the great Tomohiro Nishikado 1 year to make. That's 2,000 hours or maybe he worked overtime! Make it 3,000 hours.
Can AI software program a copy of Space Invaders in a few seconds? I don't know - I haven't seen it done, but that's your claim. I did look it up - and yes, ChatGPT could generate a version but it took far longer than "seconds".
But you know what - ChatGPT could do it because Space Invaders already exists.
Christopher Doehling retweeted
In Chicago, four vehicles descended and eight ICE agents moved in to kidnap a child.
She screams, “I’m 15,” as ICE yanks her from the car and kneels on her neck.
This is not about immigration enforcement.
It's about terrorizing Americans.
Christopher Doehling retweeted
I’m certain Trump’s not a dyed in the wool racist. That requires actual conviction. He’s more of an opportunist. Pandering to racists is what works for him right now. It’s the one portion of the voting public that nobody dared tap into.
“Mike Johnson” is what you would say if someone asked you to make up a fake politician and you only had five seconds.
