Fuck Pump Fun launched on @standard_rsv CA: 0xD178A1E0b7Ab58a5F4801Ecea1e0fB35C9Ca685a
Joined October 2026
- Tweets185
- Following1
- Followers142
- Likes79
FPUMP retweeted
@Pumpfun should immediately restore Chubbicorns PNL.
I know they don't care about their integrity as they are openly supporting rug pulls but maybe for once they would do the right thing.
There was no manipulation behind the token, it's just launchpad mechanism.
I’ve noticed our pnl has not been restored yet. Let’s go over the facts as they stand.
Your T&C that is actually in your app for this exact tournament is apparently outdated and evm coins are actually allowed. So you’re running a multi million dollar tournament but don’t have proper terms on your amazing app so that’s not why our pnl was removed.
Our pnl was removed because you decided it was a bundle. None of the following happened:
1) you didn’t go to the standard reserve site and look at the launchpad for 2 minute otherwise you would have seen those coins were air dropped to 867 bank charter holders
2) have anyone who works at pump fun who can read an evm smart contract
3) have alon dm me and say hey is this bundled what’s going on here and I would have explained the mechanism.
Instead the moment we hit top on the leaderboard our pnl was removed.
Which is interesting because your T&C talk about manipulation of coins. Yet you decided to remove our pnl when the coin started running which negatively impacted the coin. You manipulated your own tournament.
So let’s get to the real issue. It’s the name of the coin isn’t it. The coin is called fuck pumpfun. And a ragtag group of 3 friends not on your payroll were sitting at the top of the leaderboard so anyone who clicked to see what coins we were holding would see a singular coin called fuck pumpfun.
That’s why you removed our pnl isn’t it?
That’s why it hasn’t been restored isn’t it?
It’s bad PR. Now I could argue that kimchi faking a hack and posting a farm link that alon retweeted is much worse PR but what do I know.
Free fpump. Restore our pnl.
Fuck pumpfun.
FPUMP retweeted
If finding “extremely bundled” plays is this easy for your convenience, why isn’t Pumpfun adding any kind of warning for bundled plays launched on the platform to protect normies?
Especially when most of these are launched , bundled and shilled by the same Pump Squads. So protecting funds only becomes a priority when your own funds are at risk, not when it’s users’ funds?
I was told , ‘game is game’
they did not. however, the PNL score they had on their extremely bundled token was removed.
they are currently rank #492.
FPUMP retweeted
Meanwhile the Dabal squad owned most supply of GINNACOIN which died within an hour
I think the next days will be dangerous...
dislclaimer: @Dior100x managed to end up with a loss
A ‘F*ck Pumpfun’ coin helped a squad reach #1 in Pump Fun’s $2.5M competition
Then suddenly their entire PnL disappeared
They dropped from #1 to #492
Here's where it gets interesting:
@json1444 said they removed the PnL since it was heavily bundled
Meanwhile the token was launched through @standard_rsv
Standard lets projects airdrop tokens to Charter holders, but claiming requires burning their NFT and giving up their position
fair or cheating?
FPUMP retweeted
Pumpfun just admitted with this post that they promote the their chosen ones. Not everyone has the Chance to make money. It's just their Choosen ones. Instead of being silent they promote their PUMPFUN Links so people trail them even harder.
Meanwhile DABAL launched Ginnan and rugged it at 400k.
Thats what .@Pumpfun is promoting.
Thats what you guys talk good. Either way some of y'all have just 3 braincells or y'all just puppets who fight for a badge that they never gonna get.
FPUMP retweeted
it was brought to my attention that a token launched on standard's launchpad was removed from pumpfun's competition for "bundling" because 80% of its supply sits in one place
i want to clarify what this actually is, and why its the complete opposite of a bundle and actually a beneficial mechanism
first, what a bundle is: a deployer buys most of the supply across multiple wallets at launch, hides that theyre connected, waits for buyers, then dumps on them (or in the *optimistic* case, uses them for "supply control"). bundles are opaque and hide a token's real float
standard's launchpad lets deployers do what's called a "charter drop" which is the complete opposite of a bundle:
- charters are nfts held by participants in the @standard_rsv ecosystem. each holder has spent over 3 eth to join the protocol, and they've proven to be aligned, long term supporters of the projects they like
- deployers can choose to airdrop a percentage of supply (up to 80%) to charter holders. these tokens are locked in a vault contract, and charter holders cant access them unless they BURN their charter
- the airdrop isnt controlled by the deployer. the tokens sit in a single public contract, 0xb8748E02f07dd80F1DB99A49F92546B2210D844d, with no admin key and no owner withdrawal
- nothing is hidden. anyone can verify the mechanism and lock onchain, which is the opposite of a hidden bundle
- charter drops cant be dumped instantly. the tokens are split across every charter holder, not one wallet, and holders only receive their share by burning their charter. it's a public token lock with a real cost to unlock, not free supply ready to hit the market
were glad bundled tokens are being policed, but if this counts as a bundle, we'd urge you to look at the majority of the other tokens in this competition
as a side not, over 4M USD of tokens has been airdropped to charters and we've seen less than 5 charter burn to receive the airdropped tokens
since we're on the topic anyway, let's talk about market cap versus liquidity on charter drop tokens. dashboards count the locked 80% in market cap, so the market cap to liquidity ratio looks thin
but, measured against tradable supply, the pool is deeper than on other launchpad tokens since the same amount of liquidity supports a much smaller float, because most of the supply is locked. treating locked supply as tradable gives a misleading ratio
FPUMP retweeted
A ‘F*ck Pumpfun’ coin helped a squad reach #1 in Pump Fun’s $2.5M competition
Then suddenly their entire PnL disappeared
They dropped from #1 to #492
Here's where it gets interesting:
@json1444 said they removed the PnL since it was heavily bundled
Meanwhile the token was launched through @standard_rsv
Standard lets projects airdrop tokens to Charter holders, but claiming requires burning their NFT and giving up their position
fair or cheating?
FPUMP retweeted
They can’t even correctly identify a bundle vs a launchpad feature.
Pump badges right now are actually bundling and raping coins to zero and it counts for their pnl.
FPUMP still here saying f pump.
the standard launchpad has a unique feature where tokens deployed can airdrop tokens to charter holders
charter holders are members in the ecosystem that have spent a minimum of 3 eth (current auction clearing) and are incredibly aligned with the standard reserve protocol
the unique mechanism is that this airdrop requires charter holders to BURN their nft and position in order to claim their airdrop. this leads to a unique prisoners dilemma not present in any other project and launchpad
it is not an “80% bundle”, it is a vault contract that holds the airdrop that distributes the tokens when charter holders burn
happy to give additional context to anyone
FPUMP retweeted
The 79% holder is the contract for tokens being held in reserve for charter owners on @standard_rsv
There are 867 owners of the 79%.
This is how their launchpad works where a new coin can reserve tokens for their NFTs that have to claim them by burning their NFTs that have a 4eth ish floor.
No charter gets more than 2.2m tokens.
