Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers) profile picture

Tech guy from the computer era, retired from HPE in 2016; consult for Daedaelus; Blasphemous hypothesis on a condition I've had for 30 years (baffles medicine)

Sacramento, California
Joined April 2015
Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)Photo by Steve Chalmers (@FStevenChalmers)
Steve Chalmers retweeted
This is one of the finest, most powerful television ads I've every seen. Do American a favor and share this everywhere. Heart, not policy papers. Love, not hate. Hope, not fear. Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant.
Texas was built by hope. By people who had no business believing — but believed anyway. To every Texan who’s ever wondered if anyone in power is paying attention: We are taking our state back. Because a little bit of hope is a dangerous thing.
404
6,162
108
17,940
390,235
This is the best 2024 post mortem I've seen. BTW the ability to be honest about what's happening in Gaza is a litmus test for are you willing to tell the truth, and are you captured by the donor class or a certain PAC. The D establishment fails all those tests right now.
I'm not running for office. But if I were, these are some of the lessons I'd take away from what happened in NY yesterday. 1. Authenticity is measurable. Voters can smell a focus group from a mile away. 2. Endorsements from the current Democratic leadership now read like warnings. The establishment wing of the party is no longer a sword. It's a question mark. 3. Conviction beats caution. The candidates who said hard things about rent, about who pays for what, about Gaza, they won. The triangulators lost. 4. Cost of living is everything. Everything else is wallpaper. 5. The middle is not a strategy. It's an empty room. Voters reached past the establishment to grab someone who actually believes something. 6. Don't fear the base. Court it. The Democrats who ran from their own voters lost. The ones who ran toward them won. 7. If you want to lead a party you have to be willing to fight inside it. Mamdani didn't ask permission. He took the field. The lesson under the lessons: the country is tired of being managed. People want to be led.
2
1
1
6
399
My X logon today failed. Turns out I've been using my email rather than my X handle for over a decade as my username to log on. Apparently now I have to use my X handle. Embarrassed my troubleshooting skills are so rusty it took 15 minutes rather than 15 seconds to solve.
1
115
Steve Chalmers retweeted
The Painful Truth about the #Wired #LongCOVID article. Deeply disappointing they published a misleading article that could cause real harm to so many people. I had our latest research Al system deconstruct & critique it. Here's the short take-down. fleet.brainworks.ai/foundry/…
13
28
9
159
8,979
Steve Chalmers retweeted
Replying to @hannahspierMD
Hi Hannah, Your comment is not just wrong. It is deeply disrespectful and genuinely inhumane. Please, before speaking with such certainty, look at the recent medical literature on ME/CFS. This disease is not psychological. It is a serious, multi-system biological illness involving the immune system, nervous system, autonomic function, metabolism, circulation, and energy production. I’m university educated. I was a tech founder and CEO. I had a beautiful girlfriend, a full life, ambition, independence, and every reason to want to be out in the world. I snowboarded, fly-fished, hiked, travelled the world, worked relentlessly, and lived in the mountains because being outdoors was one of the great loves of my life. From my bedroom window, I can still see the peaks I would give almost anything to hike again. I would cut off my arms and legs if it meant having the physical capacity to live normally again. I now have very severe ME/CFS with extreme physical, cognitive, and sensory disability. I lost my work. I lost my partner of seven years. I lost my ability to have sex. My ability to speak is greatly diminished. I cannot tolerate light, sound, television, podcasts, reading, touch, human presence, or even emotional expression. Crying, laughing, or pushing slightly too hard can leave me with severe physical symptom exacerbation for days. Sometimes, if I push too far, the worsening is permanent. This is not anxiety. This is not deconditioning. This is not a lack of motivation. This is not a belief system. Yes, the CNS and autonomic nervous system are profoundly dysfunctional, but that is only part of the picture. The depth of biological disruption in ME/CFS is staggering. The suffering is almost impossible to describe. It is not tiredness. It is not burnout. It is a state of being trapped inside a body that punishes basic human activity. Words like yours are not harmless. They contribute to the stigma that leaves severely ill people dismissed, neglected, and abandoned while they are already living through something close to hell. Please open your eyes. Read the science. Listen to patients. This disease is real, and the people suffering from it deserve basic human respect. The opinion you have is outdated and lacking any serious scientific basis. Please, just for a moment, imagine that you might be wrong. Imagine that the people living with this disease are not lazy, anxious, deconditioned, or mistaken about their own bodies. Imagine that they are describing a real biological illness that medicine has failed to properly understand for decades. Because that is the reality.
25
108
5
609
10,120
Steve Chalmers retweeted
If governments were actually doing their job, this Palantir document 👇 wouldn't be a manifesto they proudly boast about, but a clear sign of the urgent need to purge its software from the public institutions it has infiltrated. What are they saying, essentially? They basically promote a clash of civilization worldview in which there exists a "they" - the supposed enemies of Western civilization, whose cultures the document codes as inferior - and a "we" who must stop indulging in decadent restraint and invest massively in AI weapons and defense software (which conveniently makes Palantir's product catalog the civilizational cure). Look at point 4 for instance. They write that "the limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software." It all rests on a pretty massive assumption: that coexistence is impossible. Why would "free and democratic societies" (by which they obviously mean Western-style liberal-democracies) need to "prevail"? Why can't they simply coexist with other civilizations or political systems out there? Nowhere in the document do they defend this assumption: it's simply asserted as the starting condition of the argument. But it's the entire ballgame: if civilizations and political systems can coexist - as they largely have, imperfectly but recognizably, throughout history - then the entire case they make in the document evaporates. In fact one can argue that, studying history, the big problem was not that civilizations couldn't coexist: it was that, from time to time, one of them decided that others were inferior, threatening, or standing in the way of its rightful expansion - and acted accordingly. So many catastrophes and so much human suffering in history trace back not to the fact of plural civilizations, but to one of them deciding it could no longer tolerate the others. The problem, in other words, has almost always been exactly the worldview Palantir is now selling. Their manifesto isn't warning against the cause of some of the worst periods in history: it's arguing for reviving them! Or take point 15: they explicitly call for the re-armament of Germany and Japan, and an end to "Japanese pacifism". Basically undoing one of the foundational settlements of the post-WW2 order. I mean, think about the insanity of this for a second: a private company - unelected, answerable only to its shareholders - is casually proposing to overturn the security architecture of two continents. A settlement that took a world war, and tens of millions of dead to establish. Why do they propose this? There is obviously a commercial motivation: a remilitarized Germany and Japan are massive new defense-software markets. But the more troubling answer is that point 15 fits into the ideological project the rest of the manifesto lays out - a civilizational contest requires a consolidated Western bloc, and pacifist members are a liability in such a contest. So taking a step back we now have what's the most influential defense-software company in the world, with its code deeply embedded in all the machinery of Western states - intelligence agencies, militaries, police forces, welfare systems, border controls - openly outing itself as an ideological project. They're effectively saying "our tools aren't meant to serve your foreign policy. They're meant to enforce ours." Because, worryingly, that's what they CAN do. Palantir software is all about basically telling states: "these are your threats, these are the people and groups to watch, these are the patterns that matter, these are the targets that warrant action." For instance the DGSI - the French intelligence services - use Palantir (see: xitter.gq/RnaudBertrand/status/2…): do you honestly think the software is warning them about, say, the NSA tapping the phones of French government officials? About the weaponization of US extraterritorial law against French companies? Did it warn them about the AUKUS ambush that cost France a sixty-billion-euro submarine contract? Obviously not. And that's exactly what the manifesto is saying. They've positioned themselves as advocates of Western civilizational unity, so their software can't undermine it. The ideological position and the product roadmap have to align, or the whole project falls apart. This makes their software not only deeply dangerous for the world as a whole but also, almost by definition, for any country using it. When it comes to your security as a state, it is primordial you base yourself on truth as opposed to ideology. The entire point of an intelligence agency is to tell its government what is true, not what your so-called "allies'" defense contractors would like you to see. A state that outsources its threat assessment to a company with an explicit ideological agenda is not gathering intelligence, it is essentially subscribing to propaganda. The conclusion couldn't be more obvious. Every government still running Palantir software in its intelligence, security, or public-service infrastructure needs to start ripping it out, now! Lest they want to be embarked on the delusional and deeply destructive clash-of-civilizations crusade Palantir has now openly committed itself to.
Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com
327
5,088
385
13,157
951,218
Steve Chalmers retweeted
In the midst of ICE horror, the Senate needs to prohibit Trump from using ICE as a voter suppression tool. Senate Dems need to put into the approps bill a prohibition on ICE agents being near polling places. This is a must have. Last chance to do this.
6,398
3,112
1,177
10,286
2,033,378
Steve Chalmers retweeted
Thanks to Senate Republicans, 17 million people will lose their health care. Thanks to Senate Republicans, rural hospitals will close. Thanks to Senate Republicans, three million Americans, including veterans and seniors, will lose food assistance. Thanks to Senate Republicans, families will see their energy bills go up by $400 a year. Senate Republicans are doing all of this and more — hurting working people across our nation — in order to pay for $1 trillion in tax cuts for billionaires. There is still time to stop this bill before it passes in the House. Call 202-224-3121 and tell your representative to vote no.
12,971
34,406
1,609
194,451
9,456,661
Every one of us in the chronic illness community would benefit a lot from spending our precious time and energy pressuring governments for serious funding to pursue research on the full range of leads, instead of the constant infighting about which pet theory is superior
6
18
3
145
5,409
Steve Chalmers retweeted
Ok, so after that (unintentional) cliffhanger, let's talk about energy production infrastructure and post-exertional malaise (PEM) in people with infection- and exposure-associated chronic illnesses (IACIs) such as #LongCOVID, #MECFS, chronic #Lyme and more. Let's start with 1/
29
207
37
689
53,501
I normally stay away from politics here, but think this Brian Tyler Cohen interview of California's Governor Newsom a few hours ago is a very candid look at what's happening in Los Angeles I was born, raised, and have spent most of my life in California youtube.com/watch?v=RWny24RW…
3
525
It- A few years back, there was a guy named Brandon Mayfield, an ordinary attorney living in Oregon. He had a wife, kids, a law practice, and lived a pretty normal life. Then, out of nowhere, the FBI showed up at his door, arrested him, and accused him of being involved in the Madrid train bombings in Spain. Why? Because a fingerprint database flagged him as a “match.”
Turns out, the database was wrong. He’d never even been to Spain. But because all his personal data was in government systems, and because the authorities trusted their “master file” more than common sense, his life was turned upside down. He was detained for weeks, his house was searched, his family was terrified, and his reputation was trashed, all because a computer said so. Now, imagine that, but on steroids.
With Palantir building a master database, it’s not just your fingerprints. It’s your texts, your emails, your medical records, your purchases, your movements, your friends, your opinions—everything— all in one place, all cross-referenced, all searchable by people you’ll never meet.
If the system makes a mistake, or if someone in power decides you’re a “problem,” you could be flagged, investigated, or even punished, without ever knowing why, and with no way to defend yourself. And it’s not just about mistakes.
Think about how this kind of power could be abused. Maybe you go to a protest, or you post something critical of the government online. Suddenly, you’re on a list. Maybe you lose your job, or you can’t get a loan, or you’re denied entry to an event.
This isn’t science fiction. It’s already happened in places like China, where the government uses massive databases to control who can travel, who can work, and who can speak out. The bottom line:
A master database isn’t about keeping you safe. It’s about making sure you can be watched, tracked, and controlled.
If you think “I have nothing to hide, so I have nothing to fear,” remember: Brandon Mayfield had nothing to hide, either.
But when the system gets it wrong—or when the people in charge decide you’re inconvenient, your life can be ruined in an instant. That’s what this means. And that’s why it matters.
Is this what you voted for?
464
5,046
344
10,640
535,085
Steve Chalmers retweeted
The minimum wage should be a number that, if you work at that wage for 40 hours per week, you’re able to afford housing, healthcare, and groceries. That’s not a radical belief.
5,042
15,761
575
169,737
5,927,757
Guys, it's the oligarchs. If you want to blame someone for 2024, blame the oligarchs. Anyone telling you to blame someone else is part of the oligarchy. Dark money has been to blame since citizens united.
352
2,987
85
12,585
243,618
Steve Chalmers retweeted
Thank you to some amazing colleagues who took time and precious energy to craft this rapid response to the recent @bmj_latest piece. When people try to hijack #LongCOVID, #MECFS and other complex illness as psychosomatic it is important we strike back: bmj.com/content/389/bmj.r977… 1/
44
372
48
1,076
101,273
If it is not clear yet, there is a disconnect in what people are experiencing, scientists seeing, and government's priorities. It's a worldwide problem. If any media outlets want to cover this scandal, I have a collection of DMs from #LongCovid patients offering me their brains.
The NIH director's advice vs. the reality. According to the @WHO, an estimated 15-20% of people infected with COVID experience long-term symptoms known as #LongCovid. There is no fun in this.
19
267
14
818
54,895
Steve Chalmers retweeted
The Five Families of Healthcare In every empire, there is a hidden court. A ruling elite whose power is felt but rarely seen. In American healthcare, that court is not found in hospital boardrooms or surgical theaters. It resides in the offices of five corporate behemoths: UnitedHealth. CVS. Elevance. Cigna. Centene. Together, they now control 46% of the U.S. insurance market. But "insurance" is too narrow a term. They don't merely process claims. They orchestrate the system. This vertical integration resembles nothing so much as the great zaibatsu of pre-war Japan—corporate conglomerates that owned everything from raw materials to retail outlets. Except healthcare's Five Families have achieved something even Mitsubishi never managed: control of a sector comprising one-fifth of the world's largest economy. They own the physician networks. They own the pharmacies. They own the PBMs. They even own the algorithms that decide whether you're approved or denied. Consider UnitedHealth Group: $395 billion in annual revenue, 400,000 physicians in its networks, and Optum's data analytics that process 14.7 trillion healthcare transactions annually. This is not innovation. It is quiet domination. The consolidation was swift and strategic. Between 2006 and 2016 alone, these insurers executed 400+ acquisitions, primarily in data, pharmacy, and physician practices. Unlike European systems with countervailing regulatory powers or Japan's post-war reforms that dismantled similar concentrations, America's healthcare oligopoly faces remarkably little resistance. Worse, they lobby against the very reforms that would bring balance. Site-neutral payments, a modest correction that would stop health systems from collecting 600% of Medicare for the same treatment a physician delivers at 80%, is sabotaged at every turn. Price transparency? Obstructed. Preauthorization reform? Delayed. PBM rebates and backdoor kickbacks? Defended with $71 million in annual lobbying. These firms do not deliver care. They do not heal the sick. But they profit from every transaction that does. In the final accounting, this isn't a broken system. It's a rigged one, with the Five Families at the top. And like all empires built on extractive institutions rather than productive innovation, it cannot sustain itself indefinitely. #healthcare
32
121
6
330
15,616
Steve Chalmers retweeted
“A healthy [child] wants a thousand things, a sick [child] only wants one.” - Confucius linkedin.com/pulse/growing-u…
143
367
71
1,376
238,711
Donald Trump promised to let Elon Musk self-police his conflicts of interest. The result? Those investigating his companies have been fired. Cases against his companies have been dismissed. The corrupt self-dealing is staggering.
5,135
7,708
350
20,439
654,619