Grant Ramaley retweeted
Whether you are of any belief—Islam, Mormonism, Buddhism, Catholicism—or your religion is to “believe there is no God at all but me,” my desire is that we live in peace and dialogue as brothers and sisters in this fleshly existence, seeking to center our Faith on what is True.
I have friends of many different beliefs that do not square with my own, and they are kind and respectful and even endure my questioning of their beliefs. Sometimes iron must strike iron to make us sharper.
Having traveled the world and broken bread in so many beautiful cultures for more than two decades, and having discussed so many other beliefs and what they offer, one thing is clear: to have no faith in anything is a more hopeless existence.
And yet, while many religions do not agree, most share commonality on things that matter to us all—being true, being just, being kind, and loving one another with brotherly love.
If we cannot agree on some things, let us be satisfied with those precepts we can agree on, while extending patience to others who need more time to arrive at their own decision and place in eternity, however dire we feel that decision may be.
Love demands that we respect free choice, at least with respect to choosing what we believe.
Surely some cannot tolerate—and are even maddened by—any discussion of a possible spiritual state. Some blindly follow as if growing in their faith cannot tolerate being questioned.
You don’t have to be settled on any belief to offer some wisdom. Life experience alone has raised mankind up to believe in many things we call “the common good.”
I laughed when Elon Musk was asked what his philosophy for life was. He paused and said “Strive to be less wrong. Whatever else, do that.” He was quite right on that point.
My aim is simple—land on Faith so True it can endure any challenge, even though Faith does not require that every true thing can be fully known.
Even so, the residual risk of our eternal state does rest on some elements of “Faith” that we cannot see, test, or know—and not all “blind faith” is “untrue faith.”
Stay Faithful and True.
🤖 Made with AI
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!
2nd Corinthians 5:17
🤖 Made with AI
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Many people assume the Bible is packed with so many “Do Nots” that no human could have written it. There is a thread of wisdom in that thought—yet God never intended His Word to be a joyless list of prohibitions.
He designed us to be deeply loved, fully satisfied, and free to enjoy the good gifts of life, including the richness of fruitful labor and the beauty of sex within His perfect design.
Yes, men “carried along by the Holy Spirit” authored the Scriptures. Under God’s hand, instructions for living, songs, poems, letters, and no fewer than four biographies of Jesus Christ—God’s ultimate answer to life, death, and eternity—flowed onto the page.
Man’s deep longing to be loved and happy is exactly why the Bible exists. It is not a book that says, “Do not be happy, do not have sex, do not prosper.” Far from it.
God wants us to discover real love, lasting happiness, and true meaning—while protecting us from the currents that shipwreck the soul: the lie that money can buy joy, or that sex outside His design can fill the emptiness of the heart. These are the siren songs Scripture warns us against.
The Bible is best understood as a navigational chart—a guide to the highest form of life, living, and love—while steering us clear of the forces that ultimately empty the soul.
🤖 Made with AI
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Replying to @jcryle
Ironically, not so true. I would argue that man’s deep desire to be loved and happy is exactly why the Bible exists. It is not a book of “Do not be happy, do not have sex, do not get rich.” Not at all.
God is simply trying to help us find real love, lasting happiness, and true meaning in life—and to keep us from being thrown off course by wrong desires. The lie that money will finally bring love or happiness, or that sex outside God’s perfect design is somehow better or freer, is precisely the kind of siren song the Scriptures warn us against.
So as funny and clever as the original take may seem, the Bible is far better understood as a navigational chart: a guide to the highest form of life, living, and love—while steering us clear of the currents that pull us toward what ultimately empties the soul.
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Replying to @farmingandJesus
What lies behind many of the Old Testament laws reflected realities far more serious than what we face today—yet those principles still merit careful consideration. The real problem arises when we confuse the purpose of those laws with a person’s standing before God as saved or unsaved, and in the process overlook their practical beauty: supporting life, reducing affliction, disease, and infection, and even protecting the flourishing of sexual relationships through wise guardrails.
I would raise this question: isn’t one of the biggest sins Christians commit today is drifting into legalism, moving away from love expressed through wiser, more thoughtful discourse? Even so, keep the Sabbath! You will find yourself outperforming yourself! Give and be more blessed. Not everything God commands makes sense, but they provide very real benefits.
When we look at tattoos and piercings through a modern lens, the risk of life-threatening infection is far lower than it once was. This is key.
I once found myself advising government officials on new health-department rules that would require sterilization of tattoo instruments before each use—the same standard required for medical and dental tools, [which I normally advise regulators on hiw to better protect the public].
So the Old Testament was written long before anyone understood sterility assurance and modern sterilization methods became routine.
So even Liz’s cautions are relatively minor notes from her modern day perspective; they don’t rest on the genuinely life-threatening dangers people faced three thousand years ago.
My advice? Make sure the artist uses a steam autoclave before you sit in the chair. You don’t want hepatitis or something worse.
Most reputable tattoo artists already know this. Soaking instruments in alcohol is better than nothing, but it’s nowhere near as reliable as proper steam sterilization. It won't destroy certain pathogens of concern, such as certain spores.
My point is. Sure, this law exists and many others like them. If we never raised pigs, we would never have bacon nor would mankind suffer so many diseases they transmit from birds and other animals. Modern medicine will save many, but not all. Bacon is here to stay. But there is a reason Jesus destroyed a whole herd of pigs, and it wasn't for loathing bacon.
🤖 Made with AI
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Carrying on from "What kind of sinner are you". Derived from 1st Corinthians 6:9-11, I wanted to dig into chapter 8 and talk about its odd focus on gray areas.
Paul shifts gears to talk about the "might be sins" that "might not be" sins. And it centers on "Meat sacrificed to idols".
To understand the context of chapter 8 we first need to first grab history of the culture at that time.
Among the new followers in Corinth, meat sacrificed to idols created real problems. Meat was too expensive, except around festivals involving the worship of Dionysius.
Raw torn flesh of a bull was a staple during festivals honoring Dionysus, the god of wine and ecstasy.
During the citywide festivities, women known as Maenads, dressed in animal skins, would whip the festivities into a frenzy of drunkenness and unrestrained madness—culminating in acts like tearing apart a live bull with their bare hands and sharing its raw meat with the crowd.
This meat, tied to the unleashing of all moral restraint and fueled by alcohol, was a potent mix of taboos that left deep scars on those who later came to follow Jesus.
Today, alcoholics provide one modern parallel to this. Once you've been freed from alcohol addiction, temptations and inclinations linger such that its an "All-in or All-out" change of heart. There is no middle ground on drinking alcohol if your an alcoholic.
The same goes for addictions to sex outside of heterosexual marriage, drugs, gambling, .. you name any activity, and it may have a cousin that is a "sin".
Gray areas are activities that can do harm, under certain circumstances.
Sin promises immediate gain but are typically end up doing some harm to others or ourselves
A Christian metal song by Bride, "Picture Perfect," captures this in a story of a young woman's one-night stand leading to pregnancy, abortion, and a lifetime of regret. The lyric hits like a lightning bolt:
"One night of pleasure ain't worth a lifetime of pain / I watch the tears roll down like a heavy rain."
youtu.be/6HsM2E5AJeY?si=yR28…
Whether it's sex, alcohol, or involvement in a modern cult, we must be mindful that past sins—especially those wired to our brain's pleasure centers—can trigger stumbles for newer believers who've left that lifestyle behind.
In my previous study, "What Kind of Sinner Are You?," I described the third type of sinner: the young man or woman who sins but fights back afterward. They don't excuse it; they hate it. I've met Christians from all walks with pasts like those Paul lists in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, where he says, "And that is what some of you were."
But here's the truth: Regardless of our past, it no longer defines us.
We may carry scars that need healing, but we're no longer "the girl who killed a baby"—we're a princess of God, redeemed by Christ!
Mature Christians need to encourage, teach, and remind younger believers of who they are in Christ, the power of God's truth, and the freedom we have.
At the same time, we should appreciate and accommodate their sensitivities—whether that's refraining from drinking alcohol around a recovering alcoholic or, as Paul addresses, simply not eating meat sacrificed to idols.
Paul also encourages us to gently teach that meat, alcohol in moderation, or even wearing a flattering outfit isn't inherently sinful.
There's a time and place: Wearing a sultry nightgown for your husband is fine; wearing it in public is not.
Paul is applying common sense here to spare others the hardship of wrestling with their sin nature.
We're all sinners who stumble from time to time, but we must mind our brothers and sisters, especially those with a past of addiction.
Love is sacrificial. Skip the booze when you discover your around alcoholics. Break bread, drink the wine, eat the meat and give thanks to our Almighty God. He made much for us to enjoy, but not at the expense of others. Love like Jesus.
🤖 Made with AI
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Replying to @KarolineGosling
And she cannot truly succeed in this until she first submits to God. Only then will she rightly understand how to submit to her husband—for his genuine good, not merely his passing whims.
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Replying to @TheBabylonBee
And indeed, that is why Peter was chosen. He stands as the perfect representative of every soul who dares to try—yet fails. The one who, swollen with pride, confronts obstacles too vast for human strength and begins to sink. An utter, devastating failure at the end—Judas-level in its depth—yet unlike Judas, he was forgiven.
Only when Peter was finally broken and reduced to nothing did Jesus have the living stone He needed: a building block for His church. Not a church of the strong or the self-righteous, but a church of redeemed failures, made holy. Not because we were ever good enough, but because we sank low enough to grasp the hand that lifts us into eternity.
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Replying to @NUCLRGOLF @brysondech
Ever had one of those magical days where everything clicks? Fairways split like butter, greens hold like they owe you money, chips cozy up to the pin, and putts just keep dropping. You’re rolling, feeling unstoppable.
Then you stand over a 240-yard approach for a dream eagle. Pure swing, perfect contact… and it sails just left into the wheaties — that thick, soul-crushing rough.
Now you’re buried like a 4x4 with bald tires in knee-deep mud. The golf gods are cackling, your buddies glance back with fake sympathy, and you swear you hear them muttering “better luck next hole” as they walk away.
Grant Ramaley retweeted
“You should take the approach that you're wrong. Your goal is to be less wrong.”
— Elon Musk
Grant Ramaley retweeted
... for though the righteous fall seven times, they rise again,...
But sometimes they need our hands to give them a lift. GOD'S forgiveness is COMPLETE! GET UP!
🤖 Made with AI
Grant Ramaley retweeted
After watching this video, a strange thought took hold of me: Imagine a world inhabited only by the elderly.
Unlike all those movies where the young, beautiful and ambitious are allowed to live, but like that movie Logan's Run, those over 30 are no longer allowed to live.
Sure, we need our health, desire, purpose, but the elderly carry the full weight of a lifetime, where the quietly soften into lovingkindness, honesty and satisfaction with the simpler things, a friendly greeting by a baker, etc.
The strong ambitions, vanities, and restless desire have finally fallen away, leaving only a deep, gentle rest.
Perhaps this is why Heaven feels so right. It isn’t just that evil is absent — it was simply worn out on earth long before they arrived.
But indeed, those aged-out souls of heaven are given new, everlasting bodies, but those elderly in their hundreds, thousands, etc. Pretty kind folk I think.
The Music Never Gets Old | Surreal AI Short youtu.be/PSv4Qsg7XUs?si=SMR1…
Grant Ramaley retweeted
'Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated; it satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time rewarding and maddening and is without a doubt the greatest game mankind has ever invented' -
Arnold Palmer
Grant Ramaley retweeted
WE DID IT. Made my first hole in one!
Still can’t believe it was with Justin Rose right before the Masters this week.
The video is live on YouTube. It’s one of the best matches I’ve had on top of the Hole in one.
Grant Ramaley retweeted
Having spent years in risk management for medical devices, I kept hitting the same fuzzy regulatory phrase: “reduce risk as far as possible.” In practice, it usually meant spending whatever similar companies were spending—so your device didn’t stand out as the dangerous cheap option.
That led to an awkward question in a meeting: “Does anyone ever put a dollar value on a human life?” The room went quiet, eyebrows went up, and the answer was simple: “Of course we do… but we’re never allowed to say it out loud.”
Insurance companies have no choice—they do the math. Back in 2000 they were using about $250,000 per life. That number let them price policies people could actually afford. Governments are worse at it because they don’t have skin in the game the same way.
The Ford Pinto story is the perfect example everyone remembers but usually gets wrong. Ford’s internal analysis valued a life at roughly $200,000 and calculated that adding the $11 part would cost about $34 million across all the cars. They rolled the dice. Twenty-seven people died in rear-end fires, and the infamous memo ended up in court.
The public outrage wasn’t really about the $11 or the $200k figure. It was about seeing the cold math written down next to burned bodies. That’s exactly why companies and regulators hate talking about it openly.
Here’s the truth we all tiptoe around: every product we use carries an unspoken price per life saved. Cars, medical devices, airlines, even bicycles. We accept a certain level of risk because zero risk is impossibly expensive. Roughly 1 in 12,000 drivers will die in a car over their lifetime. We know the number, but we don’t want to look at it.
The real question isn’t whether we put a value on life. We already do it every day. The real question is whether we’re willing to be honest about the numbers—or if we’d rather keep pretending they don’t exist.
Grant Ramaley retweeted
So...
What Terafab Actually Is
Terafab is a huge new chip-making project being built by Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI in the Austin, Texas area (near Giga Texas).
Intel just joined to help with chip design, building, and packaging. The goal is to make custom, high-performance chips needed for AI systems, humanoid robots (like Tesla's Optimus), self-driving cars, and even future data centers in space. Kind of a "chip foundry" instead of relying only on outside suppliers like TSMC or others.
The Key Goal: "Produce 1 Terawatt per Year of Compute Capacity"
Compute capacity means the total "brain power" the chips can deliver for running AI and calculations. It's not just the number of chips, but how much processing power they provide when running.
1 terawatt (1 TW) = 1,000,000,000,000 watts (one trillion watts). In this context, it's the annual production rate of chips that could deliver that much computing power once installed and running.
For scale: Current global production of advanced AI chips (from all companies worldwide) is roughly 20 gigawatts per year. That's like 0.02 terawatts. So Terafab aims for something 50 times larger than the entire world's current output.
Or we could build 826 'Doc Brown time machines' Tesla could be breaking ground on time machines, and we would never know!






















