"Mr. Piker has never advocated the lynching of Black Americans, or anyone else."
except landlords...and it's on video
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
HASAN PIKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT JENNINGS,
Defendant.
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND
1. On August 11, 2026, Scott Jennings falsely told a nationwide podcast audience that Hasan Piker was “out there calling for Black voters to be lynched.” He falsely told his listeners that Mr. Piker had a “plan of returning our country to lynchings.” And then he falsely told his social media followers that Mr. Piker “says the USA should resume lynchings against black people.”
2. All of Mr. Jennings’ accusations are false. Mr. Piker has never advocated the lynching of Black Americans, or anyone else. He has never called for a return to lynchings. And he has never proposed anything remotely resembling the supposed plan that Mr. Jennings falsely attributed to him.
3. Mr. Jennings did not merely mischaracterize something Mr. Piker said. He took a false, fabricated, and manipulated video of Mr. Piker, added a made-up quotation that Mr. Piker never uttered, and then made accusations that went beyond even what the manipulated footage purported to show. Mr. Jennings presented those accusations as fact, telling his viewers to “[l]isten for yourself” about Mr. Piker, knowing that he was playing a falsified video of Mr. Piker for those viewers, and completely disregarding the truth of Mr. Piker’s actual words.
4. The underlying footage came from a broadcast nearly two years earlier on Twitch, an online streaming service owned by Amazon. On October 29, 2024, Mr. Piker was reacting to a debate between two Black political commentators, one liberal and one conservative. When the conservative commentator blamed “woke DAs” for policies supposedly harming Black Americans, Mr. Piker mocked him by sarcastically portraying that comment as nostalgia for an era before the civil rights movement. Laughing, Mr. Piker said:
He said, “We need more Klansman, okay? Can we go back to a better time when lynchings were happening? This is what I like as a Black man. Also, there’s no real racism in America.” My man said, “woke DAs,” dude. What are you saying?
5. Mr. Piker was plainly ridiculing the commentator’s position. He was not endorsing it. The debate video remained visible behind him. Mr. Piker introduced the remarks with “He said,” laughed as he delivered them, and concluded by questioning the commentator’s argument. His viewers understood the sarcasm. Some laughed along. Others expressly described his comments as hyperbole. Still others predicted that someone would eventually remove the context and circulate the resulting footage as though Mr. Piker had been speaking sincerely.
6. That is precisely what happened. In August 2026, a 42-second video began circulating on social media that combined fragments of three separate Twitch broadcasts. The portions taken from Mr. Piker’s October 2024 stream had been cropped, shortened, and rearranged. The underlying debate was removed from view. So was the contemporaneous audience commentary.
7. The words “He said,” which identified the object of Mr. Piker’s ridicule, were omitted. Mr. Piker’s laughter and subsequent explanation were also removed. The resulting video portrayed sarcastic criticism of another as though it were an expression of Mr. Piker’s own beliefs.
8. On August 11, 2026, Mr. Jennings broadcast that false video on The Scott Jennings Show, misrepresenting the manipulated video as authentic. But Mr. Jennings did not stop at repeating someone else’s misleading edit. He added his own caption to the video, presented as a direct quotation from Mr. Piker:
PIKER: “LET’S GO BACK TO A BETTER TIME WHEN LYNCHINGS WERE HAPPENING”
—
🔗 Political streamer Hasan Piker has filed a defamation lawsuit against CNN commentator Scott Jennings in federal court in Washington, D.C., seeking $72.5 million in damages over Jennings’ false claim that Piker advocated lynching Black Americans. The full complaint is linked below.
Adam Friended retweeted
Aside from this being a grotesque ad, it's just bad, for several reasons. First off, it's not a realistic scenario. Some of those AI fan videos people made during my campaign resonated because they depicted realistic scenarios you could relate to, like liberal yoga moms sheepishly confessing they were voting republican because they didn't feel safe in LA anymore.
But literally nobody is thinking about the Joooooos when they're buying bananas. Well, actually maybe Tucker Carlson or Abdul Elf Sayed is. I actually can kinda picture him dropping to his little knees in the middle of the aisle and screaming "NETANYAHUUUUUUUU" when he sees the price eggs or his 3" heel risers.
It's also not helpful that the actress they hired looks like a melted fart. Ostensibly, you want the people delivering your message to be appealing, so the message comes off as appealing...this is marketing 101. But I know what happened here...casting for political ads is very challenging. Actors are loathe to have their face tied to controversy. Superstars can get away with backing political candidates, but if you're a day-player, it's very risky. This was the best they could get. I guarantee you a lot of actors read the script and said "holy shit this is fucking atrocious, you've gotta be out of your fucking mind". Who you're seeing on screen here are the actors with no scruples...they read a script that blames Jews for bananas and thought "hey I could use $400...those Jews made my bananas expensive, after all!"
All the Steve Hilton ads were cast with good-looking people, because his scripts were clever and good-natured, not like this demonic shit. Added to this, they're trying to co-opt the brilliant "she's for they/them" ad that went bananas back in 2024? It's all so cringe. Watching ugly white people bitch about bananas and Jews is not gonna win over any black voters in Detroit. Really atrocious backfire here.
Adam Friended retweeted
LAUSD spent $34 million in taxpayer dollars to build a campus that’s been empty since 2021.
The vacant school gets frequently vandalized so LAUSD has to spend $20,000 per month of taxpayer dollars to keep the empty campus secure. Over $200,000 a year just for securing a vacant campus.
Zero children are helped by this. LA City is a complete mess with just no leadership whatsoever.
LAUSD began constructing a new charter campus in 2012 when enrollment had already been declining for a decade. That site has now sat empty for five years. latimes.com/california/story…
Adam Friended retweeted
Tesla FSD Miles going parabolic.
FSD miles are a flywheel.
To catch up, rivals have to copy 4 things at once:
1) a huge fleet w millions of cars
2) deep vertical integration: chip, software, training, and OTA updates, all in-house
3) get thru a decade long march of the 9's ie edge cases learned from billions of miles, not hand-coded
4) crazy compounding as better FSD, more subs, more miles, better FSD, etc
$TSLA
A brutal year for Bitcoin is just getting started.
Give me three minutes to explain why you should dump it now.
Outflows from ETFs are signal and will continue.
We will test the 57k low again in the next 12 months.
Why?
Because there are far too many dynamic places to put your money that are creating MUCH more value.
Why put your resources into a dead network that offers nothing beyond a store of value?
What's the point of place the BTC be if Bitcoin's Ponzi-scheme nature has gone away!?!
The viral nature of bitcoin was it's power... if you didn't own you were MOCKED!
Now? Completely reasonable, heck, SMARTER, to ignore bitcoin and place other bets!
No one is trying to convince people to buy Bitcoin anymore... the memes and NFTs are gone.
No one is saying $ BTC can change the world, because it won't — and BECAUSE AI HAS!
Just sell and shift from Bitcoin to Super Intelligence because one provides little to no value, and the other provides unlimited upside for humanity.
This should be obvious to everyone right now.
Bitcoin will never break its all-time high again.
Adam Friended retweeted
Once again, you’re probably overthinking what stocks to buy
Update: Since President Trump said:
"Go out and buy a Dell" $DELL is up ~93%
Adam Friended retweeted
Replying to @bindelj
I wasn't prepared to wear that jumpsuit and frankly, I find it offensive that you were making that a condition of the interview.
Adam Friended retweeted
$META is trading now at 12x its operating cash flow (and close to 10x 2027 ocf). Valuation has dropped despite top-line growth accelerating in the last year.
I continue to believe $META will be one of the biggest winners of the AI era, as it has a unique position that it will be able to leverage, and Muse will turn out to be $META's best asset in the long run.
$META continues to be one of my core positions (yes, I didn't like the equity raise timing, but we are past it now, and the valuation is again very compelling).
Adam Friended retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: California’s defense in the federal election ballot case may have just taken a serious hit.
Los Angeles County argued that segregating approximately 20,000 ballots associated with suspected noncitizen registrations was operationally impractical.
Enter Clinton Curtis, the elected Registrar of Voters for Shasta County, California, a licensed attorney and computer programmer.
In a sworn declaration filed October 26, Curtis directly challenges that argument.
He states that California’s electronic election systems can flag voters whose eligibility is challenged and that ballot-sorting machines can isolate those ballots BEFORE they are processed.
He further explains that manual procedures exist to accomplish the same objective.
This is significant.
If California’s election systems already possess these capabilities, why did Los Angeles County argue that segregation could not reasonably be accomplished?
More importantly, were election officials aware of these capabilities when making representations to the federal court?
Because there’s an enormous legal difference between being unable to perform a procedure and knowingly representing that a procedure cannot be performed.
Curtis’s declaration doesn’t establish intentional misconduct, but it creates a factual dispute that deserves serious examination.
The DOJ now has sworn testimony from a sitting California election official challenging a central component of LA County’s operational defense.
The question is no longer simply whether the ballots CAN be segregated.
It’s whether Los Angeles County’s election officials accurately represented what their systems are capable of doing.
And if they didn’t, WHY NOT?
NEW: The Registrar in Shasta County, CA disputes LA County's Claim that it can not temporarily segregate mail-in ballots to determine citizenship.
Clinton Curtis, the Shasta County Registar, also a licensed attorney in New York, writes under penalty of perjury:
"Electronic information management systems that are used for voting in California can flag the ballots of likely noncitizens identified by the United States, and the sorting machines can segregate those electronically flagged ballots while determining citizenship under state and federal law. Manual procedures also exist to segregate ballots cast by individuals believed to be noncitizens."
Adam Friended retweeted
BREAKING: The nation’s first-ever Detransition Clinic is now open as a result of my historic settlement with Texas Children’s Hospital.
Adam Friended retweeted
Notice how she doesn’t tell you HOW he died. If she tells you that, her talking point falls apart. So she leaves it out.
He killed himself.







































