Ever feel like someone’s trying to rewrite reality right in front of you? Show me your reality. Drop your nomination below (or on any post): • Who • What they said or did • Why they belong here (and how it affected you or others) Personal. Political. Local to Global. Show your reality. Nominations appreciated. Independent. No party loyalty. Just the truth.

While not "gaslighting", this post relies on rhetorical framing, a straw man, and overstatement. Rhetorical framing: It attempts to cast the United States as somehow complicit in international law-breaking for simply granting entry to Flavio Bolsonaro. Straw man: There is no public confirmation of an asylum claim or grant, as suggested. If there were a claim/grant, this post claims it would be solely because Bolsonaro lost the election to Lula. Overstatements: “Giving… safe haven” and the asylum framing overstate the confirmed action (visas, not verified asylum or permanent protection). “Its role helping Bolsonaro flee” asserts active US facilitation of the departure itself; reporting confirms the US is granting entry after he left (defying a Brazilian court order to surrender passports), but direct US operational assistance remains unconfirmed speculation from Brazilian sources. Presenting the investigations as the decisive fact without noting they are allegations under a sealed inquiry (not convictions) and that Bolsonaro has Italian citizenship, which can affect asylum eligibility.