Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor) header
Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor) profile picture

Founder | Co-CEO & CTO https://xitter.gq/t.co/trNATB2aLm & https://xitter.gq/t.co/LXWnn80NeI | 3D | Imagery | FutureTech | Formerly @ PropertyFi, Nearmap & Esri | Tweets are my own!

Atlanta Metropolitan Area
Joined June 2009
Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)Photo by Geoff Taylor (@GeoffHTaylor)
You don’t need a ChatGPT or Claude subscription anymore just ask your coding questions to America dot gov
Today we’re launching America.gov, a single front door to the federal government. Instead of opening a bunch of tabs across different agency sites and trying to figure out which information actually matters to you, you can ask America a question and get the relevant answer from across 29,000+ official government websites, with the source and what to do next.
126
226
43
4,240
554,762
Geoff Taylor retweeted
Wow - @pmarca called this three years ago. TL/DR every bad regulation has a plausible sounding moral cover story—and a secret industrial interest that stands to benefit Regulatory capture is evil.
Replying to @pmarca
The Baptists And Bootleggers Of AI Economists have observed a longstanding pattern in reform movements of this kind. The actors within movements like these fall into two categories – “Baptists” and “Bootleggers” – drawing on the historical example of the prohibition of alcohol in the United States in the 1920’s: “Baptists” are the true believer social reformers who legitimately feel – deeply and emotionally, if not rationally – that new restrictions, regulations, and laws are required to prevent societal disaster. For alcohol prohibition, these actors were often literally devout Christians who felt that alcohol was destroying the moral fabric of society. For AI risk, these actors are true believers that AI presents one or another existential risks – strap them to a polygraph, they really mean it. “Bootleggers” are the self-interested opportunists who stand to financially profit by the imposition of new restrictions, regulations, and laws that insulate them from competitors. For alcohol prohibition, these were the literal bootleggers who made a fortune selling illicit alcohol to Americans when legitimate alcohol sales were banned. For AI risk, these are CEOs who stand to make more money if regulatory barriers are erected that form a cartel of government-blessed AI vendors protected from new startup and open source competition – the software version of “too big to fail” banks. A cynic would suggest that some of the apparent Baptists are also Bootleggers – specifically the ones paid to attack AI by their universities, think tanks, activist groups, and media outlets. If you are paid a salary or receive grants to foster AI panic…you are probably a Bootlegger. The problem with the Bootleggers is that they win. The Baptists are naive ideologues, the Bootleggers are cynical operators, and so the result of reform movements like these is often that the Bootleggers get what they want – regulatory capture, insulation from competition, the formation of a cartel – and the Baptists are left wondering where their drive for social improvement went so wrong. We just lived through a stunning example of this – banking reform after the 2008 global financial crisis. The Baptists told us that we needed new laws and regulations to break up the “too big to fail” banks to prevent such a crisis from ever happening again. So Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, which was marketed as satisfying the Baptists’ goal, but in reality was coopted by the Bootleggers – the big banks. The result is that the same banks that were “too big to fail” in 2008 are much, much larger now. So in practice, even when the Baptists are genuine – and even when the Baptists are right – they are used as cover by manipulative and venal Bootleggers to benefit themselves. And this is what is happening in the drive for AI regulation right now. However, it isn’t sufficient to simply identify the actors and impugn their motives. We should consider the arguments of both the Baptists and the Bootleggers on their merits.
16
83
3
1,236
54,733
Geoff Taylor retweeted
The AI safety nonprofits around Anthropic promote an Anthropic-aligned Doomer narrative, whether Tarbell Fellows in popular media, or METR in evaluations. All rely on Moskovitz's Anthropic stock worth $7 billion, which the parent funding org sits on. This stock increases in value if Anthropic grows; many of these orgs claim independence from Anthropic, but none of them are, because of their funding lineage through Moskovitz's stock -- not to mention the frontier lab monoculture. The Anthropic-aligned nonprofits are journalistic and regulatory facades to promote AI Doomerism, which promotes bigger IPOs and regulatory capture, presumably by, e.g. METR, which Anthropic controls through its funding funnels. The more Anthropic succeeds, the more the AI Doom narrative expands through these orgs, because more money means more funding for AI Doom. It is an organically self-amplifying machine. Anthropic promotes the problem -- AI Doom -- and promotes itself as the solution -- AI Safety -- which means control of regulation by Anthropic. AI Doom is now deafening and will become louder the more financial success Anthropic has. China is more optimistic about AI than America because it doesn't have Anthropic. The system is structured as a self-amplifying regulatory capture machine. Anthropic couldn't stop itself, even if it wanted.
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances. What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation. Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture. It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off. Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle. It starts with METR. Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models. He proposes METR for this purpose. But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock. Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio. And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem. This stock was worth $500 million early last year. It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later. METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth. Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well. But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much. The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all. The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll. If this were the end of it, that's bad. But that isn't all. The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom. The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others. They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's. All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile. As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder. Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created. From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts. This itself is an objective fact. The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it. But the problem also goes in the other direction: If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die. Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen. Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly. They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic. And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly. What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations. The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture. And that feedback loop is winning. That's what Jacob Coxon is. China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China. America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level. Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences. Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully. It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America. Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear. Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers. Congress must investigate. Evidence and Github in next post. Then some supplementary figures.
40
202
28
650
38,612
Geoff Taylor retweeted
The world’s AI infrastructure is going to be reinvented. The data centers, the racks, the cooling, the power. It's the largest infrastructure opportunity in the history of computing. We raised $1.1B for it.
$1.1B for the Machine Age.
30
28
3
325
60,137
Geoff Taylor retweeted
Actual video of our Ai future 🫣 the ending is perfect 👌
25
64
9
386
37,814
Geoff Taylor retweeted
68
2,060
52
24,714
336,126
Geoff Taylor retweeted
NEW: Startup launches AI Coverage Insurance — “for when your AI messes up.”
113
123
36
1,764
165,516
Overheard in Silicon Valley: "Rebranding to 'forward deployed engineer' from 'consultant' one of the great all time recruiting whammies."
143
158
52
3,836
374,131
Defending my Spring Boot Java app that uses 64GB RAM to return { "status": "ok" }
71
711
52
11,098
543,344
Geoff Taylor retweeted
Marc Andreessen explains future belongs to generalist in the AI era. Founders will need skills across 6–8 fields. Deep expertise still matters, but broad knowledge plus AI tools will be more valuable in most areas. Top CEOs already operate this way.
152
664
126
5,673
512,567
Nano Banana Pro / Gemini 3 Pro Image is crazy. It turned this blueprint into a realistic 3D image. It did not just create the image, it first read the blueprint properly and then created the final output with every small detail. Blueprint source image added below 👇
Official : Google DeepMind has launched Nano Banana Pro aka Gemini 3 Pro Image , I was one of the early testers, Thank you Google DeepMind team. Some major improvements : - 1K 2K and 4K image generation - More accurate legible text in multiple languages - Better consistency across concepts characters and styles - Precise localized editing for any part of an image I asked it to explain Transformer Architecture , this is incredible stuff. Some prompts and image examples from my early testing 👇
45
225
31
2,147
608,597
Geoff Taylor retweeted
The cat looks at the rain and sits on the code that draws it all.
31
432
13
4,129
98,882
And when you realize the 64 hexagrams of the I’Ching map perfectly to the 64 codons of your DNA…you can begin to understand how Human Design works. We are all binary beings living in a computational universe.
113
405
46
2,846
100,329
Just. Wow. As we went over Mexico and the U.S. this morning, I caught this sprite. Sprites are TLEs or Transient Luminous Events, that happen above the clouds and are triggered by intense electrical activity in the thunderstorms below. We have a great view above the clouds, so scientists can use these types of pictures to better understand the formation, characteristics, and relationship of TLEs to thunderstorms.
1,075
8,978
1,104
61,484
5,109,611
Geoff Taylor retweeted
All of the billions spent on AI innovation just so we can get these beautiful cat videos
4,755
30,001
5,197
245,923
24,752,563
FOX NEWS ALERT: The @CIA has reportedly just offered a buyout to its entire workforce.
992
4,601
880
20,824
2,762,567
Recently, I've been playing with my iPhone ToF sensor, but the problem has always been the abysmal resolution (256x192). The team behind DepthAnything released PromptDepthAnything that fixes this. Using @Polycam3D to collect the raw data, @Gradio to generate a UI, and @rerundotio to visualize. Links at the end of the thread
29
208
2
2,114
244,865
Absolutely not.
Sam Altman: Advancing AI may require "changes to the social contract." "The entire structure of society will be up for debate and reconfiguration."
3,040
3,402
388
38,931
2,651,552
It costs $12,690.00 to publish open access at Nature. They are literally uploading a PDF file.
247
929
205
8,484
861,305
Condolences @ssankar.
Nothing can stop Palantir, nothing
241
150
26
5,830
439,697