Andrew McClure retweeted
Einer der besten und berührendsten Spots, die ich je gesehen habe. Und das zu einem sehr schlimmen und traurigen Thema - zu dem es sehr wichtig ist, dass es viel Aufmerksamkeit bekommt. Daher bitte teilen. #MonstersEverywhere
@NOMOREorg
Andrew McClure retweeted
Imagine a life where we just listened to FACTS
Immigration down
Inflation down
Unemployment down
You would be happy wouldn’t you?
So what’s making you not happy?
The right wing trolls on here?
GB News?
The Daily Mail?
Maybe it’s time some people decided if they’d prefer to listen to right wing propaganda or maybe just listen to facts?
Andrew McClure retweeted
Brentford 1981-82
Ron Harris and Terry Hurlock creative combo in central midfield…
Andrew McClure retweeted
Another reason why I'm increasing tuning out of BBC Newsnight..
Left: Winston Marshall. Guitarist. Father, Sir Paul Marshall, co-owns GB News. On Fox News suggested a mine-laden ‘floating wall’ in the Channel to stop small-boat crossings
Right: Dr. Faiza Shaheen, an economist, academic, writer and political campaigner focused on inequality, social mobility and public policy.
🤖 Made with AI
Andrew McClure retweeted
The balance sheet Kemi Badenoch doesn’t want to talk about 👇
In 1989, the water authorities were sold debt-free. The government wrote off £4.9 billion of debt and added a £1.5 billion “green dowry”. The companies paid £7.6 billion for the assets.
Since privatisation, around £78 billion has been extracted in dividends while industry debt has risen from virtually nothing to more than £60 billion.
Meanwhile, customers paid through their bills for the infrastructure investment that Badenoch cites as evidence of privatisation’s success.
Thames Water illustrates the model perfectly: debt-free at privatisation, now carrying about £18 billion of debt and repeatedly hovering near special administration.
The public cleared the debts, transferred the assets, funded the investment and now carries the risk of failure. Shareholders extracted the returns.
If Badenoch calls that a success, the obvious question is: success for whom? @labourlewis
Replying to @LizWebsterSBF
The balance sheet often remains difficult to manipulate, which is why Kemi Badenoch chose to overlook it completely. Back in 1989, regional authorities were sold off debt-free — the government wiped out approximately £4.9 billion of debt and added a £1.5 billion “green dowry." The companies paid £7.6 billion for these assets. Fast forward to the early 2020s, and Financial Times analysis based on regulatory data revealed that dividends had soared to around £78 billion in today’s money, with net debt climbing above £60 billion from a starting point of zero. Industry figures estimate that capital spending during this period ranged between roughly £190 billion and £236 billion. Yet, shareholders didn't fund this expansion through fresh equity; instead, dividends were extracted while customer bills covered the capital investments, and debt financed the payouts. Thames is a striking example: initially debt-free at privatisation, it now carries around £16–20 billion in debt and has repeatedly teetered on the brink of special administration.
Andrew McClure retweeted
The mantra appears to be
Hard work = High salaries
And we will look after you
Childcare if you earn over £100k
Scrap inheritance tax
Meanwhile the poorest and disabled
Cut their money as they are not productive
Same old Tories
Andrew McClure retweeted
“Ted, do you want to come with me to Gloucestershire and shout at some diesel thieves?”
Andrew McClure retweeted
I'm going to say this again in clear, simple terms so there can be no equivocation:
Prior to Brexit, immigrants very rarely came to the UK in small boats because it is an extremely dangerous mode of transport. They came in lorries. Organised smuggling gangs knew that because there was free movement of goods between EU countries that there was a high chance that a lorry concealing immigrants would not be searched.
I am sure you all remember that terrible case of a lorry-load of migrants from China and Vietnam that was abandoned in Essex. 31 men and 8 women died.
The onset of Brexit meant that gradually, from approx 2018 onwards, more and more stringent checks began being carried out on lorries, as well as increased security at ferry ports - even Newhaven-Dieppe are surrounded with high barbed wire security fences, and every vehicle leaving Dieppe is opened and checked, so I imagine it must be pretty much the same at Calais and Boulogne as well.
We have no idea how many people a year arrived in the UK unlawfully by lorry. The reason for this is because they were literally untrackable. Occasionally you would see a lorry stopped by the M2 or the M25 with a handful of people standing behind the safety barrier while the police had the blue lights on. But they certainly could not track what they didn't know about.
The likelihood is that there were a great many more people getting into the country. The overwhelming majority of them would disappear into the undergrowth, never to be seen again until either
a) they committed an offence
b) they were caught in raids working illegally
c) they either walked into a police station to claim asylum almost immediately or
d) they popped over the parapet several years later because they wanted to regularise their status, either by marrying, or because they had children, or under the Long Residence rules - it used to be 15 years but is now 20 years. If you can prove you have been in the UK continuously for 20 years and have otherwise kept your nose clean, you are entitled to limited leave to remain. Eventually you might get settlement after 30 years - again, if you can prove you have always been in the country in that time. You will not get nationality if you entered the country illegally these days, though, unless you can show that there is something exceptional about your contribution to society.
The small boats are different. The small boats are highly visible. The small boats - and their passengers - are very easy to spot, and very easy for the Coastguard and Border Force to track. A man from the BBC used to spend all his time stood on a cliff counting them post-Brexit.
Yes, there will be the occasional one that slips through undetected. But that is the opposite of the way it was with lorry smuggling, where it was the occasional one that was actually detected, and the majority slipping through un-noticed.
The irony of Farage, Lowe, Robinson, Tommo and all the other far-right screechers claiming we are unsafe because of "fighting age men" arriving on these boats is hilarious if it wasn't so desperate. When the boats arrive, every person is fingerprinted, screened and vetted as best we can, although another irony of Brexit is we no longer have automatic access to Europol except if we have grounds to suspect someone is a criminal rather than just an asylum seeker, so well done Brexit for that as well.
Also, as we are no longer party to what's called the Dublin Agreement, whereas before we could make an application to France to take them back, and take responsibility for the asylum claim, now we are out of the EU we can't do that either.
But at least we know who is here, we have their fingerprints, and we know who they are.
In short, we are arguably safer from the "fighting age men" now that at any time in the past 30-odd years. The numbers are reducing. The numbers of crossings are reducing.
I hold no candle for Labour these days, but at least they are processing the backlog the Tories (deliberately?) built up and those who don't have the right here are being deported as well.
Boris Johnson is as full of shit as he always was.
Feel free to share this.
Andrew McClure retweeted
40% of UC Claimants are in work.
25% of renters receiving housing benefit are in work.
At least 680,000 disabled people on PIP are in work.
The Tories watched pay fall over a decade as they also slashed benefits to the bone.
Meanwhile Tory MPs have claimed £730,000,000 in parliamentary expenses since 2015 and have given £324,000,000 in PPE fraud to their pals during the Pandemic.
Andrew McClure retweeted
Ash Sarkar, "Every time we've had these squeezes on welfare recipients, what we've actually seen, rather than dealing with issues like long-term unemployment, is an increase in child poverty, and in-work poverty as well"
"Half of all NEETs are not receiving welfare of any kind.. There's a crisis of opportunity and a crisis of purpose"
"There are 140 applicants for the average graduate job opportunity.. That's the worse it has been since 1991"
"It's up to successive governments that have failed to create opportunities for young people in this country"
My view: It's been around 10% for decades
Britain cannot punish its way into prosperity. If work is meant to be the route out of poverty, it must be available, secure, accessible and pay enough to live on.
For too long, governments have responded to economic failure by blaming those locked out of opportunity. The real solution is investment in decent jobs, skills, healthcare, mental-health support and affordable homes, not cutting support and pretending hardship is an employment policy.
Andrew McClure retweeted
£144.9m. Cost of Brentford’s starting XI against Chelsea. Many reasons for Brentford’s success. Judicious recruitment, obviously. They're so good at finding value in the market place, seeing potential and developing it. Also: calm, strong leadership in the boardroom, dug-out and on the field.
Plus togetherness, fitness, preparation, effective game-plans, pace in transition, set-piece work, scouting of opposition, defensive determination, throwing themselves into blocks etc.
Plus succession planning. Thomas Frank leaves, they know to promote Keith Andrews. Players leave, they know their recruitment targets. They sign good characters as well as good players, including Schuster, Sangare, Anthony, all impressing this season. Plus a culture that helps new signings settle quickly. It helps there is little pressure on them. If needed, players given time and support to develop.
Brentford are a model club in many ways, a family club, community club and such a well-run club. A mix of humility, work ethic, analytics, vision – and fun. Serious professionals who really look they’re enjoying themselves. #bees 🐝
I have a theory.
Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne are not stupid. When they each announced £36m donations to Reform, they will have known about the already published proposals that could make those donations impermissible once the legislation takes effect retrospectively.
So what if Reform was never expected to keep the £72m?
What if the point was to make two deliberately unprecedented donations, wait for the Government’s pre-existing rules to catch them, then scream “corruption” and claim the establishment had changed the law to stop Reform?
It would manufacture exactly the phoney conspiracy and outrage Reform thrives on, just on an unprecedented scale.
Maybe the extraordinary size of the donations wasn’t incidental. Maybe it was the entire point?
Andrew McClure retweeted
Figures show agricultural inheritance tax changes are having the intended impact.
'Lifestyle buyers' of agri land ⬇ 11%
Proportion bought by famers ⬆ 59%
Oh dear, @JeremyClarkson 😬
thelondoneconomic.com/news/f…
Andrew McClure retweeted
Fern Girl To Be New Artwork on the W4th Plinth
Transylvanian surrealist Cristina Schek returns to the piazza chiswickw4.com/default.asp?s…
































