Haipeng Luo (@HLuo18) profile picture

PhD in Geophysics

Joined February 2019
Photo by Haipeng Luo (@HLuo18)
How do fluids and fault heterogeneities affect earthquake rupture and ground shaking? Our paper on the Noto earthquake provides some information that could be useful in untangling the mystery (Ma et al. on this Science cover science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/…).
The 2024 magnitude 7.5 Noto earthquake in Japan occurred on a fault system that has seen repeated seismic swarms since 2020. New research in Science deciphers the intense ground motion of the event. Learn more in this week's issue: scim.ag/86Y
1
8
31
3,112
Haipeng Luo retweeted
Please consider submitting to our AGU session: T011 - Linking Tectonic Processes to Relative Sea Level Changes in Subduction Zones: Observations and Models Across Various Timescales agu.confex.com/agu/agu24/pre… Abstracts are due in two weeks!
4
2
8
1,301
Save it for any robust InSAR processing work in future
🚀 Exciting News! ctSent version 2.0 is released. P.S. finally had some time to package it up 🤪. I've added parallel computing for lightning speed and introduced burst overlap interferometry. 🌐✨ Check it out for a faster, more advanced experience! zenodo.org/records/10776079
2
392
Haipeng Luo retweeted
🆕Please find our newly updated 3D deformations. It is just a preliminary result with 1 km resolution. The higher resolution map is on the way. Deformations are well consistent with the reported coastal change. More to post ~ --@HLuo18 @kmno4_deliang Shengji @Dr_Yu_Jiang and me
I just quickly processed InSAR displacements for this Mw7.6 earthquake. Please see the preliminary results below. From it, we can clearly see two large deformation asperties. These data can only cover region onshore, but what for the northern part offshore🤔?
2
33
3
96
70,507
🆕Our (@MarsZeff @kmno4_deliang and me) preliminary slip distribution of this Mw 7.6 Noto earthquake, from joint inversion of InSAR and GNSS data. Seems 🤔 a good correlation with all geodetic data and BP results. More to post~
I just quickly processed InSAR displacements for this Mw7.6 earthquake. Please see the preliminary results below. From it, we can clearly see two large deformation asperties. These data can only cover region onshore, but what for the northern part offshore🤔?
16
25
6,577
In most regions, quake magnitudes follow a simple pattern: for every M8, there are ~10 M7s & ~100 M6s, etc. The PacNW (Cascadia) does not seem to fit the usual mold, with 1 M9 every 500-600 yrs on average, but not, so far as we can tell, ~10 M8s in that same span.
8
34
4
161
Congrats #UVic researchers Haipeng Luo and Kelin Wang @UVicScience for their published research this week in @NatureGeosci, studying internal structures of the subduction zone system. #Univresearch
NGeo: Postseismic geodetic signature of cold forearc mantle in subduction zones nature.com/articles/s41561-0…
2
3