Birgit π©π° π¬π±π«π΄πͺπΊπ³οΈβππ³οΈββ§οΈ retweeted
Patrick Stewart was a socialist.
Glenda Jackson was a socialist.
George Orwell was a socialist.
Albert Einstein was a socialist.
Nelson Mandela was a socialist.
Nazis were NOT socialist, Musk is a liar, and he spreads Nazi propaganda.
This one I love
Jean-Luc Picard by way of Sir Patrick Stewart.
Oops. Spot on.
Replying to @jwmares
Fun fact: Europeans don't listen to Americans on employment law for the same reason we don't listen to Afghans on women's rights.
Birgit π©π° π¬π±π«π΄πͺπΊπ³οΈβππ³οΈββ§οΈ retweeted
This is why Iβve argued that understanding the medieval and early modern history of Eastern Europe is essential for contemporary geopolitics - because if Europe doesnβt have a deep historical narrative about its eastern flank, the Kremlin will provide one: shows.acast.com/historyrage/β¦
I once again repost an essay I wrote last year on the importance of political mythology in the Russian imaginary. Putin and his advisers are obsessed with history and ideology β it is the constructivist framework through which they operate. It is not the framework through which we operate.
providencemag.com/2025/03/whβ¦
Birgit π©π° π¬π±π«π΄πͺπΊπ³οΈβππ³οΈββ§οΈ retweeted
Cuba has a higher literacy rate than the United States.
It has a longer life expectancy than many countries far wealthier than it.
It produced a medical system capable of sending doctors to dozens of countries, including some that sanctioned it.
It did all of this under 66 years of economic blockade.
Now imagine what it might have built without the blockade.
The people who imposed the blockade have imagined this too.
That is why the blockade continued for 66 years.
Not because Cuba was failing.
Because Cuba was, in specific and inconvenient ways, succeeding.
And a Cuba that succeeded under its own system was more dangerous to the argument than a Cuba that failed.
The blockade was not punishment for failure.
It was prevention of success.
This!
Europe Is Being Carved Up While Its Leaders Are Still Deciding Who Should Speak.
I have a question for Europeβs leaders.
Where were you this week?
Where was the European leader standing before the cameras, declaring that Europeβs borders, security and future are not bargaining chips for Washington and Moscow?
Who told Donald Trump, publicly and unequivocally, that his administration has chosen the wrong side of history?
Who announced that Europe would consider sanctions against American companies profiting from Russian energy while Ukrainian civilians are being killed?
And who delivered the simplest ultimatum of all: Europe must have a seat at the negotiating table, or European sanctions against Russia will remain in place. No American president gets to negotiate them away.
Yes, some European leaders have spoken. Kaja Kallas, Giorgia Meloni and several foreign ministers have criticised Trumpβs Russian diesel deal. Alexander Stubb and Jonas Gahr StΓΈre even called Putin on October 27.
But here is the extraordinary part: they explicitly stated that they were not speaking for Europe.
And that brings me to something almost too absurd to believe.
European leaders have been discussing who should represent Europe in negotiations with Russia since at least May. Five months later, with November practically upon us, they still havenβt agreed on a representative with a clear mandate.
Five fucking months.
We are talking about the future borders and security of our own continent, not choosing a new chairman for the Brussels gardening committee.
Meanwhile, Trump is easing sanctions on Russian diesel. Washington and Moscow are exploring further commercial opportunities. And the Kremlin is discussing the possibility of additional American sanctions relief.
Russia invades European territory. America negotiates commercial arrangements with the aggressor. And Europe continues discussing who should attend the discussions.
You could hardly invent a more humiliating demonstration of geopolitical paralysis.
And the stakes go far beyond Ukraine.
We are watching the possible emergence of a new world order in which Washington, Moscow and Beijing treat Europe as a collection of territories, markets and spheres of influence to be divided between them.
Russia wants territorial control. China wants economic and strategic leverage. Trumpβs Washington increasingly appears willing to treat European security as another transactional opportunity.
Their interests are not identical, but their willingness to pursue them at Europeβs expense should terrify every European government.
I am not suggesting Europe should stop negotiating. Quite the opposite.
Europe should be leading negotiations over European security, defining the conditions, controlling its sanctions policy and making unmistakably clear that Ukraineβs sovereignty is non-negotiable without Ukraineβs consent.
And if Washington chooses to help finance Putinβs war economy, Europe should be prepared to examine economic consequences for those involved, regardless of whether they are Russian or American.
Enough carefully worded expressions of concern.
Enough summits about future summits.
Enough waiting for Washington to rediscover its principles.
Europe has the economic power, the institutions and the democratic legitimacy to defend its own interests. What it desperately lacks is a common political voice willing to use that power.
History will not remember how many meetings European leaders attended.
It will remember whether they stood up while the future of their continent was being negotiated.
And right now, the silence from Europeβs collective leadership is becoming almost as alarming as the conversations taking place without it.
Nothing man-made is ever perfect. Accept that and continue to work on a rules-based international order.
There is always room for improvement, so work on that.
A rules-based international order is worth fighting for, even if it hasnβt always worked as it should. The alternative is the law of the jungle, where might makes right.
Europe must step up and give Ukraine what it needs to secure a just peace. Defending Ukraine means defending the principles that safeguard Europe itself.
We are not much better today. We pack disabled people away in βhomesβ or their own homes, so we donβt need to be bothered with their human needs.
In 1867, San Francisco passed a law that effectively made visible disability a public offense. Other American cities followed, adopting what became known as the βugly laws.β
People with disfigurements, illnesses, or physical disabilities could be fined simply for appearing in public, particularly if they were poor and begging.
I find the logic almost impossible to comprehend: society saw suffering and decided the problem was that others had to look at it.
Some of these ordinances survived into the 1970s. A reminder that cruelty can arrive dressed as civic order.
Birgit π©π° π¬π±π«π΄πͺπΊπ³οΈβππ³οΈββ§οΈ retweeted
It cannot be stated often enough or vociferously enough: The Trump administration is helping Russia to conquer Ukraine.Β The United States of America has taken the side of an aggressor against its innocent victim.Β We are helping our actual enemies as they prey upon us and our friends.Β This policy reversal from both the Biden administration and the first Trump administration is a shameful abandonment of principle and of self-interest.
A stark & powerful piece from @koriSchake
aei.org/foreign-and-defense-β¦
Brilliant.
In the middle of World War Two, German soldiers in southeastern Poland started avoiding a cluster of villages.
They wouldn't go in. They wouldn't take people out for forced labor. They put up warning signs and stayed away.
They believed the area was infected with typhus.
It wasn't. Two doctors had invented the whole thing.
The man behind it was Eugene Lazowski, a young Polish doctor working for the Red Cross in the town of RozwadΓ³w. He was watching the Nazi occupation tear his country apart. Executions. Deportations. People shipped off to labor camps, many never coming back.
He wanted to stop it. He had no weapons, no army, and no way to fight.
What he had was medicine.
His friend and fellow doctor, StanisΕaw Matulewicz, had discovered something strange. If you injected a person with a harmless, dead strain of a certain bacteria, their blood would test positive for typhus.
They wouldn't be sick at all. But on paper, they'd look like they had one of the most feared diseases of the war.
And the Germans were terrified of typhus. It spread fast, it killed, and it could tear through an army. When the Germans found it, they quarantined the area and kept their distance.
Lazowski realized what that meant. If he could make enough people look infected, the Germans would leave the whole region alone.
So he started injecting his patients.
He chose carefully. He sent the blood samples to German labs for testing, exactly as the rules required. The results came back positive. Again and again.
The Germans declared an epidemic zone. Villages were quarantined. Soldiers kept out. People who would have been seized for forced labor or worse were left alone, because nobody wanted to go near them.
Lazowski had to be careful. If too many cases looked fake, someone would ask why nobody was dying. So he spread out the injections over time and kept the outbreak believable.
Eventually the Germans did get suspicious. They sent a team of doctors to inspect.
Lazowski met them with food and vodka and played the gracious host. He guided them toward the sickest looking, dirtiest patients he could find, in the most crowded rooms. The German doctors, worried about catching typhus themselves, took a few samples and left in a hurry.
The tests came back positive.
The fake epidemic lasted until the end of the war. Estimates say it may have protected around 8,000 people.
Lazowski also secretly helped Jews from the nearby ghetto, giving them medical care at enormous risk.
After the war he moved to the United States and became a professor of pediatrics in Chicago. For decades he barely talked about what he'd done. Late in life he finally wrote a memoir. He called it My Private War.
He died in 2006.
He never fired a shot. He beat the Nazis with a needle and a lab test.
May this be propaganda and not fact. π
THE GREATEST AMERICAN BETRAYAL OF ITS ALLIES IN HISTORY.
While Russia continues its war against Ukraine, the Trump administration is reportedly negotiating sweeping energy and business deals with Moscow.
Russian oil, diesel, Nord Stream gas pipelines, American investments, access to Russian airspace, and even arrangements involving Ukraineβs occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant are reportedly on the table.
Let that sink in.
While Ukrainians fight and die defending their country, Washington is exploring opportunities to do business with the very country responsible for invading it.
President Zelenskyy has already warned that the United States is choosing the wrong side of history.
And he has every reason to be furious.
Europe and Americaβs traditional Western allies have every reason to be deeply alarmed. If these proposals become reality, the consequences for transatlantic trust, NATO unity, and Americaβs credibility could be enormous.
For decades, the United States presented itself as the leader of the free world, a defender of democracy, sovereignty, and international law.
Now, its administration appears increasingly willing to put business opportunities with Putinβs Russia ahead of the principles it once claimed to defend.
This is not just about Ukraine. It is about whether Americaβs allies can ever trust Washington again.
And the consequences of that betrayal could last for generations.























