Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4) header
Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4) profile picture

Retired physician. Active in permaculture and agroecology. Homeschooling mom. Dismantle secular liberalism. #RaiseTheCaliphate

Joined March 2020
Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)Photo by Umm UZ 🔻 (@Iqraq4)
Because we are brown, we do not deserve the same. That’s all it is, isn’t it? That is what this is about. Stop pretending. Just be honest.
5
4
1
15
18,798
Umm UZ 🔻 retweeted
Kepada ‘ulama yang telah memberi lampu hijau kepada ‘Islamic banking’, semoga Allah ﷻ memberi balasan yang sewajarnya.
8
9
236
This is priceless. Finally. An Islamic scholar who understands: 1. Proof-of-work 2. The Cantillon effect 3. The difference between nominal value and purchasing power. His explanations are also clear and on point.
4
146
6
543
23,604
Those who give riba’, those who receive riba’, even those who do the auditing. You are all liable because you uphold and sustain the system. If you work in a bank, fear Allah: please quit for the sake of Allah ﷻ. He will replace with that which is better bi idhnillah.
1
1
384
Kepada ‘ulama yang telah memberi lampu hijau kepada ‘Islamic banking’, semoga Allah ﷻ memberi balasan yang sewajarnya.
8
9
236
Interesting. Islam fixes this.
She gets it. She just does
3
347
Umm UZ 🔻 retweeted
The Mongols after destroying the Islamic Golden Age
155
824
124
8,523
798,887
All roads lead to The Sunnah.
I don’t celebrate Halloween. And since becoming a father, I feel even stronger about it. Holding my son in my arms has changed the way I look at the world. I no longer just ask myself what I want to participate in. I ask myself what kind of world I’m introducing him to. What energy I allow into our home. What traditions I pass down to him. And I simply cannot understand why we have normalized celebrating death, demons, witches, fear, and darkness, especially with our children. We dress them up, decorate our homes with symbols of death, and call it harmless fun. But is it really? I believe the things we entertain, even unconsciously, matter. As a father, my responsibility isn’t just to protect my son’s physical body. It’s to protect his innocence, nurture his spirit, and raise him in the presence of God. I’m not interested in following traditions simply because everyone else does. I want my son to grow up celebrating life, love, creation, and the light of God. Not fear. Not darkness. Not death. I don’t need everyone to agree with me. But in our home, we choose the light. The kingdom of heaven is within. And that’s the kingdom I want my son to know.
1
104
This is how we homeschool.
the old education system is like dead dead there's literally never been a better time in history to homeschool your kids with AI you can now just prompt it to create an entire curriculum for your kid, give lessons, generate interactive quizzes to see what they're actually learning, explain things in a hundred different ways until they understand, adapt the difficulty and pace to their progress, generate videos, etc etc you could probably give your kids a much better education in a fraction of the time they'd otherwise spend sitting in a classroom learning the same things at the same pace as 30 other kids and then spend all that extra time playing with them, exploring, doing sports, reading, traveling, whatever it's actually insane when you think about it
107
The point of this hostage video seems to be to deliver a message from the CIA to the other European puppets who are tempted to disobey their puppeteers that they won't just be beaten & forced to wear black nail polish, but they may end up with the fishes you see in the background.
Replying to @Lagarde @ecb
How has “freedom of speech” worked for you?
184
628
37
3,313
201,143
Pada hari Jumaat mulia ini, mari kita sama2 do’akan kehancuran sistem perbankan riba yang terlaknat, dan moga Allah ﷻ gantikan dengan yang lebih baik dan diredhaiNya. Aameen.
I see this book in the bookstore and I just don’t know what to say. @KemPendidikan this is NOT on. Ya Allah please help my people get out of this. May Allah ﷻ destroy the banking system. Aameen.
1
11
222
Umm UZ 🔻 retweeted
All schools of economic thought have no moral issues with riba.
Why Are We All In Debt? Full Documentary. Tarek El Diwany details the history of how and why interest became normalized by humanity. This documentary provides a 26-minute introduction to the crucial facts on money and banking that every layman should know. Using simple terminology and clear graphics,the film explains why the current riba financial system inevitably produces. • Boom and bust cycles • Endemic inflation • Unrepayable debt Emphasising both Muslim and Christian viewpoints, the film is highly suited for use in inter-faith discussion groups, and as an educational tool for new students who are not satisfied with mainstream explanations of Keynesian financial economics. The topics explored include: • Fractional reserve banking • The difficulties arising in an economy that is heavily reliant upon interest-based financing • Religious attitudes to interest past and present • Alternative models of monetary management & financing
2
3
24
881
Umm UZ 🔻 retweeted
Why Are We All In Debt? Full Documentary. Tarek El Diwany details the history of how and why interest became normalized by humanity. This documentary provides a 26-minute introduction to the crucial facts on money and banking that every layman should know. Using simple terminology and clear graphics,the film explains why the current riba financial system inevitably produces. • Boom and bust cycles • Endemic inflation • Unrepayable debt Emphasising both Muslim and Christian viewpoints, the film is highly suited for use in inter-faith discussion groups, and as an educational tool for new students who are not satisfied with mainstream explanations of Keynesian financial economics. The topics explored include: • Fractional reserve banking • The difficulties arising in an economy that is heavily reliant upon interest-based financing • Religious attitudes to interest past and present • Alternative models of monetary management & financing
The Prohibition Of Interest / Riba In Islam Protects Property & Wealth. The Maqasid al-Shariah are basically the main goals or objectives that Islamic law tries to achieve to ensure everyone's well-being. There are five key things it focuses on protecting: 1. Faith - Making sure people can freely practise their religion. 2. Life - Keeping people safe and preserving human life. 3. Intellect- Protecting our ability to think and make decisions. 4. Lineage - Looking after family ties and honour. 5. Wealth - Safeguarding our property and money. Every rule in Islam is designed to protect one or more of these five things. For example the prohibition of consuming alcohol in Islam protects a humans mind, life, religion, and wealth. Alcohol impairs judgment, endangers health, and can lead to harmful idiotiotic behaviour, threatening both individual and societal well-being. By safeguarding the intellect and its ability to think clearly a lot of physical and psychological pain is avoided. Another example is the prohibition of fornication. It serves to safeguard lineage and family, ensuring the stability and integrity of family structures by preventing illegitimate births and the complications they bring. It also protects honour by preserving the dignity and reputation of individuals and families. Additionally, it supports the protection of society by reducing social problems like broken families, diseases, and conflicts, thereby contributing to overall societal stability and moral order. When it comes to the prohibition of interest (riba), it directly relates to protecting wealth. Interest is prohibited because it can lead to exploitation, where the rich (bankers and corporations) become richer at the expense of the rest of society, which is exactly what is happening with the current global central banks' fiat monetary system. The increasing cost of living every year, overpriced housing, the rising prices of rent and fuel are all fundamentally linked back to interest-based credit expansion by banks. This interest / riba expansion devalues the purchasing power of fiat money and therefore forces humanity to work longer and harder to keep up with inflation. It creates bubbles in the property market making the ability to own a home outright a distant dream for most. This in turn creates an unfair system where ordinary people are tempted to get into debt (mortgages), which is a further trap & goes against the principle of justice in Islam. By prohibiting interest, Islam encourages truly fair free markets and business investments where risk and reward are equally shared. In this way, wealth is circulated fairly across society, and the economy avoids the financial crises that occur in interest-based systems (boom-bust cycles). Instead of making money from interest, Islam promotes risk-sharing business investment agreements. It also encourages helping one another through interest-free loans, ensuring that wealth is used in a way that benefits society as a whole. This strengthens local communities and by extension nations. So, in a nutshell, the ban on interest is there to protect people’s wealth and create a fairer economic system, which is a big part of what Islamic law aims to achieve.
3
37
2
101
39,502
Orang Melayu tolong faham dan hadam isu ini. Sudah2lah dgn music. Saya dah tak larat dah masuk restoran mana2 MUZIK, kedai mana2 MUZIK, mall mana2 MUZIK. Macam mana anak2 muda kita tak hancus? The key to success is Qur’an. Qur’an cannot reside in a heart filled with MUZIK.
A lot of talk about music NOT being haram online but here’s a video of how the great scholar Ibn Al-Qayyim explained the impact of Ghina (music).
3
78
4
281
7,443
I see this book in the bookstore and I just don’t know what to say. @KemPendidikan this is NOT on. Ya Allah please help my people get out of this. May Allah ﷻ destroy the banking system. Aameen.
3
15
7
55
21,340
For reference:
This is priceless. Finally. An Islamic scholar who understands: 1. Proof-of-work 2. The Cantillon effect 3. The difference between nominal value and purchasing power. His explanations are also clear and on point.
2
2,397
Umm UZ 🔻 retweeted
The ones who sells you the Slop also has your cure. The type of Games they play.
14
383
24
1,193
58,932
‼️🚨One if not the most important video in the history of the 20 century! 🚨How the City of London is not part of the UK. 🚨For those who have not seen this before it’s important you watch and listen. The City of London, Washington DC and the Vatican City all have special status. This gives special rights and protections to those in these areas. 🚨The speaker is smartest and most lucid professor on banking Professor Richard Werner. 👏👏👏👏👏👏
89
1,622
99
3,440
110,139
Imagine finding out a multi-millionaire scholar never paid zakat. Not just any scholar. One spoken of in the same breath as Imam Shafi'i and Imam Malik. And not just any multi-millionaire. Someone earning the equivalent of up to $44 million a year. Imam al-Layth ibn Sa'd was the leading scholar of Egypt in his time, while running businesses that brought in anywhere between 20,000 and 80,000 gold dinars a year. That's roughly $11 to $44 million in today's money. Yet he said: "No zakat has ever been obligatory upon me since I reached the age of puberty." Why? Zakat only becomes due once wealth sits untouched for a full lunar year. Al-Layth's wealth never made it that far. - He sent thousands of dinars to scholars like Imam Malik. - He fed 300 poor people daily. - He funded students, travellers, anyone in need. By year's end, his surplus was gone. Some years, he even went into short-term debt just to keep giving. Compare that to Qarun, who hoarded his wealth, refused to purify it, and became a Qur'anic example of what greed does to a person. Al-Layth never needed the law of zakat to catch up to him. His generosity already had. Most of us are optimizing the wrong question when it comes to charity. Not "what do I owe." But "what am I still holding that I don't need?"
19
173
18
1,643
83,440
Umm UZ 🔻 retweeted
Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate. Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros. Over a billion dollars a year. Roughly $32 billion given away since 1984. Not a single voter ever approved one of those dollars. The model is simple and ruthless. You don't need to win an election. You fund NGOs, think tanks, legal clinics, university programs. They produce reports, train lawyers, run strategic litigation. And some of those people end up inside the institutions. Concrete example: the European Court of Human Rights. A 2020 report found that at least 22 of the 100 permanent judges between 2009 and 2019 came from seven NGOs that are highly active before that same Court. Open Society is the main one, and it funds the other six. The worst part: in 88 cases, 18 judges sat on the bench while the NGO they came from was the applicant, the representative or an intervening party. In any listed company, that's called a conflict of interest. None of this is illegal. That's exactly the hack. These institutions were designed to protect themselves from governments and parties. Nobody planned for a private actor funding the entire chain: the plaintiff, the expert, the lawyer, and sometimes yesterday's colleague who is now the judge. Same logic in Brussels: a dedicated policy advocacy institute, tens of millions flowing to NGOs at the heart of the EU, and Open Society among the largest private donors to the Council of Europe. And the money? Soros made his fortune speculating, most famously against the British pound in 1992. But let's be precise: the foundation doesn't make money, it spends it. The return isn't financial, it's normative. Shaping the rules is worth more than any dividend. So stop shouting "Soros" like an incantation. It gets engagement and changes nothing. The problem is structural: any billionaire, left or right, could do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Many already do. What we should demand is rules. Full transparency on the funding of NGOs that litigate before European courts and institutions. Public declarations of interest for judges. Automatic recusal. Traceability of foreign money in lobbying. Stop staring at the puppets. Look at the plumbing. Whoever funds the infrastructure of the debate always ends up writing its conclusions.
69
814
71
1,961
74,691
Not every blessing needs to be shared. Some blessings are safer when kept private. Protect your family, make du‘a, and be mindful of nazar. 🤍
5
131
1
622
21,798
Guess who the Malaysian candidates were?
To understand why Western leaders all sound the same, you need to understand how a system that has captured its own institutions keeps producing elites aligned on the worst possible line. In 2004, Klaus Schwab created the Forum of Young Global Leaders. Every year, the WEF selects a few hundred people under 40. You don't apply. You get nominated by people already inside and vetted by people already inside. Then come the annual summits, Davos, and a two-week executive program at Harvard Kennedy School built around global governance, climate, global health and "21st century leadership." Emmanuel Macron: class of 2016, the same year he launched his presidential campaign. Gabriel Attal: listed by the WEF itself among its notable members. In 2017, at Harvard, Schwab bragged that his network "penetrates the cabinets" of governments. His words, not mine. Now here's the mistake most critics make. They imagine a brainwashing camp. Two weeks at Harvard don't rewire anyone. The YGL program doesn't create the mindset. It certifies it. The capture happened upstream. The formatting starts at 18. Sciences Po, ENA, Harvard, Columbia, Yale Law. Ten years of being graded by people who already hold the consensus. You learn fast that the reward doesn't go to whoever is right, but to whoever restates the room's beliefs most elegantly. Every essay, every oral exam, every internship in a ministry or a consulting firm teaches the same lesson: the frame is given, your job is to optimize inside it. Obama never went through YGL. He didn't need to. Columbia, Harvard Law, president of the Law Review. Same factory, American edition. So by the time the WEF calls, the product is finished. The program just adds the final layer: flattery. You're told you're one of the few people under 40 who will shape the world. You spend your summers with ministers, CEOs, royals and Nobel laureates who all agree with each other. Imagine what that does to a 35-year-old ego. That's the profile it produces. Very high verbal intelligence, very low dissent. Brilliant at defending the frame, never trained to question it. And a narcissism fed by a network that confirms, year after year, that you belong to the elect. Combine the two and you get leaders who are never punished for being wrong, as long as they're wrong together. Immigration is the perfect test case. Obama, Macron, Attal can tighten a law, announce deportation numbers, harden their tone before an election. Obama deported more people than any president before him. But listen to how they talk about it. For them, immigration is never a civilizational question. It's a flow to manage, a labor shortage to fill, a demographic curve to correct, a moral duty to perform. Whether a nation has the right to remain itself never even enters the frame. Not because they've answered the question. Because their education taught them it isn't a legitimate one. That's why the voter who says "my town has changed and I'm worried" gets a lecture instead of an answer. The leader isn't even lying to him. It's worse: he genuinely cannot see what the voter sees. Twenty years of formatting taught him that this perception is a bias to correct, not a reality to address. That's the real problem with captured institutions. Not a secret plot. A monoculture. Same schools, same summits, same Davos panels, same vocabulary from Paris to Ottawa to Washington. When every leader is selected by the consensus and rewarded by the consensus, the consensus stops being tested against reality. And a ruling class that never gets confronted with reality ends up governing a country that only exists in its own slide decks. Before you vote, ask one question about every candidate: who formatted them, and who do they still need to impress?
3
20
8,126
Umm UZ 🔻 retweeted
Nothing but Debt
96
1,502
85
5,259
223,152