Replying to @RepAnalilia
So you just won an election & think you did something with this post, which got like 53 likes so far, but I just want to point out that my account has super low engagement & even I got more upvotes commenting on an AI commercial about a woman with a smelly pp.
Replying to @eternal1te
A pilates studio is the worst possible business for someone with this problem. 😭
LVPBG retweeted
Replying to @BrianAtlas
We do not support the comments made on that episode. We are no longer sponsors of the show and will not be working with them going forward.
According to the U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security,
“In just four states—California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Nevada—250,000 non-citizen voter registrations were found.
That’s 250,000 in only four states!
And there are still 46 states left.”
On top of that, there is also the possibility that a large number of votes cast for the Republican Party were discarded…
Unfortunately, Japan’s mainstream media doesn’t seem interested in this at all…
Japanese journalism is completely rotten……😑
LVPBG retweeted
Democratic Missouri state rep accused of threatening to kill someone - a day after winning reelection trib.al/tAUiDJ8
LVPBG retweeted
The West is completely unprepared for what’s coming.
Breaking: I've uncovered an apparently unreported 2012 Al Jazeera article coauthored by Abdul El-Sayed that praises the Muslim Brotherhood's electoral success in Egypt and portrays the Islamist movement in remarkably flattering terms.
At the time, the Brotherhood-led bloc had just won approximately 47% of Egypt's parliamentary seats, while the ultraconservative Salafist Al-Nour bloc secured another 24%.
Together, Islamist parties controlled roughly 71% of the elected seats.
Yet El-Sayed and his coauthor (a Harvard scholar, because of course) enthusiastically described Egypt's political transformation as looking "more promising than ever."
They also argued that the Islamist parties' electoral successes reflected their domestic platforms and "histories of social justice" more than popular support for their Islamic ideologies.
El-Sayed wasn't merely celebrating the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak. He was expressing optimism about Egypt's political future AFTER the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafists had overwhelmingly won the parliamentary elections.
LVPBG retweeted
I think that makes 7 sponsors that have dropped them. This needs to be absolutely lethal to their podcast. This should be scorched-earth, untouchable reputation destruction.
Something we don’t talk about enough is how far our cities have moved away from the rest of the country culturally. Why is this? Is it the constant bombardment of propaganda everywhere in the cities? When and why did this start?
Stephen Miller explains how the left catches the right off guard:
‘Conservatives just want to live their lives. But for the left, politics is the power to dictate your lives. They take over the schools and industries. They just keep on pushing, while conservatives are living.’
LVPBG retweeted
🚨After laughing at the thought of “digging up Charlie Kirk” and “doing it again” on her “I’ve Had It” podcast, left-wing podcaster Jennifer Welch has lost half a dozen sponsors:
Cash App, Chewy, Boll & Branch, Lola Blankets, Zenni Optical, and NOBL Travel have all released statements confirming that they are no longer working with Welch’s podcast and that they don’t support her implicit endorsement of political violence.
In total, it’s estimated that Welch’s comments have cost her upwards of $2.5 million per year.
Follow: @MorseReport
Zara Larsson is a slave to social media.
She will say anything and backtrack on anything depending on the reaction she gets from the people she panders to.
She will go as far as liking disgusting comments about children simply because the artist (Nicki Minaj) is MAGA, but will bring out Sexyy Red, who performed for Trump’s advisor, because it’s not really about who is MAGA as much as it is about who the internet has given her permission to hate this week.
She has absolutely no backbone and no real views. She’s not even from this country.
She failed as an artist and realized the only way to get attention was through woke ragebait. Her attempt at reviving her career was basically an attempt to ride the wave of Sabrina Carpenter’s rise. Sabrina was a blonde woman doing woke ragebait using the whole “hate men” angle, and Zara tried to copy that as much as she could.
Her little moment lasted approximately 2 months, precisely because the initial excitement among leftists over seeing her come out in support of their political movement faded as she became more vocal about it, and the novelty wore off.
And unlike Sabrina Carpenter, Zara isn’t particularly attractive, nor does she make particularly good music. She simply doesn’t have enough going for her to sustain the attention.
Everyone, including people who agree with her politically, has noticed this. She’s insufferably performative, and the era of celebrity wokeism just isn’t here anymore.
Billie Eilish gets dragged for being performative on a nearly weekly basis. There’s a collective fatigue with celebrities involving themselves in woke politics. It’s precisely why having an entire list of celebrities telling Americans to vote for Kamala Harris didn’t work.
It’s why every week, either Billie Eilish, Zara Larsson, Chappell Roan, or Sabrina Carpenter gets dragged by the very people who agree with them politically.
People are over celebrity wokeism. They’ve realized that these celebrities use their political opinions to revive their careers or generate outrage, getting people to defend them because those people feel like they’re fighting for a political cause rather than for the celebrity herself.
And that’s basically the whole point for many of these celebrities. They exploit how chronically online woke people are. All they have to do is pander to them, and they have an army of people defending them, and it gives them the appearance of having a devoted fanbase without necessarily having one.
I’m here for her downfall, and I’m happy she’s getting the same energy she puts out. I wish her nothing but the worst.
Hoppas det var värt det!
LVPBG retweeted
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
LVPBG retweeted
Hi. Want to see a murder on live TV?
I give you New White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller vs. Jake Tapper on CNN.
Tapper said we need illegals here to pick our crops.
Then, Fatality.
LVPBG retweeted
🚨Cash App severs ties with Jennifer Welch.
Good.
Replying to @BrianAtlas
We do not condone violence of any kind, and we are no longer sponsors of this podcast.
LVPBG retweeted
Stolen Elections / The 85% - 15% Algorithm is Found
Across 59 Key Races - the SAME formula was used:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.






































