Lane Scott retweeted
A Call for Papers: The Mercy Otis Warren Initiative at @ASU_SCETL (@FairerSexFD 's academic home) is co-hosting a student conference at Arizona State University on February 4th-6th.
Any graduate student (or college senior) in the humanities or social sciences who would like to present on the topic of "women in civic life and thought" is invited to submit a 100-word abstract to [email protected] by November 20th.
Presentations are 15-20 minutes long and MOWi director (that’s me!) will provide feedback on early drafts. Travel and lodging stipend available. Selected applicants will be notified in early December.
Probably easiest to see in choir. Without a doubt, the most tone-deaf people are the most enthusiastic about singing, and often sing the loudest. And you can't convince them they can't sing because they can't hear themselves. They think they are stars.
This paper answers why confident idiots run the world.
Cornell University published a psychological paper that explains every terrible boss, every loud influencer, and every broken corporate hierarchy.
It’s called “Unskilled and Unaware of It.”
they tested participants across logic, grammar, and humor to measure the gap between actual performance and self-perception.
And the results are wild.
participants scoring in the bottom 12th percentile consistently believed they were operating in the 62nd percentile.
they were not lying. they were literally incapable of recognizing their own incompetence.
the paper revealed a brutal paradox:
the exact skills required to master a domain are the exact same skills required to accurately evaluate your own competence in that domain.
if you lack the skill, you inherently lack the cognitive capacity to realize you are failing.
this creates a dangerous systemic loop.
the incompetent are blessed with absolute, blinding certainty. their brain protects them from their own ignorance, allowing them to speak first, demand authority, and never second-guess their decisions.
meanwhile, the actual experts suffer the exact inverse.
top performers in the study consistently underestimated their rank. because a task was easy for them, they falsely assumed it was easy for everyone else.
they hesitate. they obsess over nuance. they assume they have nothing unique to add.
we are biologically wired to confuse confidence with competence.
the loudest person in the room gets promoted, gets funded, and gets the microphone, not because they know what they are doing, but because they are physically incapable of seeing what they don't.
the only defense mechanism is building systems that stop rewarding absolute certainty and start demanding proof of work.
Lane Scott retweeted
In @firstthingsmag today, I reflect on the Rochester convention, and why building a classical school and a large and happy family has inspired in me a persistent hope that ...
firstthings.com/we-can-build…
This thread is basically West Coast rural vs the rest of the country rural.
Rest in peace, kiddo
My 13 year old has a friend over and I told them to please quiet down because the baby is sleeping and he (friend) told me to shut up?? My kids all froze and my son looked at him like wtf?? And my husband who was on a call in his office was like, "Joe, I need to call you back." They're now on a walk discussing respect, kid was still smirking until my husband walked out and told him to get his shoes because they were going to go have a talk. Weird afternoon.
Enough with this nonsense. Halloween is a Catholic holiday and requires no "saving" by protestant church ladies.
We have chapels made of human skeletons, for crying out loud.
If you are uncomfortable with mortality and embodiment, probably Catholic holidays aren't going to be your jam.
How should Christians approach Halloween?
Christians tend to fall into four different camps when it comes to participating in Halloween:
- Total abstinence
- Full participation
- Partial participation
- Redemptive participation
Some abstain from Halloween altogether. Others fully participate in the festivities, while some enjoy the family fun without participating in the glorification of evil.
I believe the better alternative is redemptive participation.
My mom has set this example for me for years. She uses Halloween as an opportunity to share the gospel by attaching Bible verses to candy, making Scripture signs for her front lawn, and sharing the love of Jesus with the families who come to her door.
As she says, “What other time of year do you have people coming to your home and asking you for something? This is like the easiest evangelism opportunity possible.”
A night associated with darkness can actually be an opportunity to shine the light of Christ.
There is no journalism anymore, because the industry mostly fails to support itself. It is in deep recession because the digital age taught the consumer to expext information for free.
What people think of as journalism is mostly paid propaganda.
It relies on big donors, big pockets to survive, and is more like the think tank world than newsrooms of old that funded their opinion and investigative reporting with their own classifieds and ads sections.
Don't believe me? Take a look at how successful and well-paid writers and journalists who tell ordinary people what they ought to be thinking are, vs. people who try to report to DC and the country at large what ordinary people actually think.
Take a look at how surprised all the best reporters and writers and journalists were to find out what ordinary people and voters actually think in the last three or four election cycles! Nobody was fired. Nobody was "let go" because they completely failed to anticipate what the entire country thought and how the entire country would vote. That's not the job.
Nobody reports on what ordinary people think or do or want to vote for. Everyone is paid to "report" to ordinary people on what they should vote for and should be thinking.
Reader-supported journalism on here and other sites is a tiny world compared to corporate and party-of-government-supported "journalism."
Wait. So this is illegal rn?
You're telling me all my rowdy friends who bring their moonshine to the festivals are not on the up and up?
Lane Scott retweeted
'Speed' derives from the Old English 'spēd,' which referred to good fortune/success.
This sense of 'speed' lives on in 'Godspeed':
"God spede you" = "God prosper you"
We hope this brings you up to speed.
Remote work in a suburb or city without a lot of friends around, maybe. Remote work from your farm with animals and gardens and children and a house you take care of and walks in the beautiful countryside anytime you need a break from the screen is wonderful.
Remote work is one of modernity's greatest gifts, but it requires a complete overhaul of the work/life balance question. You have to beef up the "non work" side of your life significantly so you don't get buried.
I think this happens to every generation of writers who addresses world or national events only to find themselves incapable of causing the kind of reform or change they believe is necessary.
You can change things and people locally, one soul and one friendship at a time. But "national politics" doesn't exist in the way you think it does. In reality it is palace intrigue, which sooner or later turns most writers into jesters.
That is not to say that no national change or reform is possible; it is--but it would have to be done by cutting off funding for various projects, changing the retirement age, significantly altering incentives for work, for welfare, disability, etc. By workmanlike, financial and structural changes.
For writers, and for observers of culture, there is little to do on the national level and everything to do on the local level, where culture actually lives.
These last six months feel like some kind of breathless void in the discourse.
Most of the sharpest thinkers I know of appear to be on some kind of hiatus, or are depressed, or took a job somewhere, or are doing some kind of religious hermetic thing. Many are "going through the motions" and privately admit they are losing their direction.
If you look at each person's life trajectory and whatever appears to have diminished their output as writers, artists, thinkers and so on, it all seems just personal on the surface: but I suspect it may actually be a broader kind of 'exhaustion'. Their personal difficulties in their work seem only to be manifestations of a much wider cultural exhaustion.
We appear to be in a transitional era that goes on forever. Many have attempted to keep track of or to influence the general direction that culture is going in, and appeared to be doing so fairly well for a while. But by now, everyone who has attempted that task has been humbled deeply by a series of vague and inscrutable cultural shifts that have snuck in with quiet haste. The result has been total discombobulation and a wearying sense of empty instability.
Nobody knows what is next, and nobody appears to be in a strong position to shape what comes next either. Our compasses are failing us. Meanwhile the publishing industry continues its spectacular death, reading itself is collapsing, and even the anthropological realities of what it means to be human are now in question.
We've felt the "something's gotta give" feeling for so long that we are now numb, and any attempt at saying what will or could or might "give" now feels pointless. Building niche sideline underground IRL projects feels extraordinarily distant. Deep traditional religion appeals, but its logical endpoint is for each of us to shut up, withdraw, and embrace a life of silent devotion.
And above all -- spectacle is now boring, redundant; the wider culture is tired of LOOKING and clicking and subscribing and so on. Writers are tired of marching to the 24/7 tempo of that environment as well. Burnout is the chief export of this system -- for author and reader alike.
Whatever this is, it's clear to me that an era has very quietly ended and that whatever's "next" may not come at all, at least not for a long time yet.
Hickman is correct this is the long game. One of my friends here rejoices whenever a local moves to Idaho. "Great. More houses for my kids!" he says. One thing for parents to consider is whether or not college-age kids would ever want to move back and settle in your red state tax haven of choice.
It's literally true that for true long-term-thinkers of a conservative type -- bedding down in a deep blue state and just biting the bullet for the next 20 years might be the top-tier long-play.
The libs in states like NY, NJ, IL, HI, CA, and so on are aborting all their kids. They are abdicating their place in the future.
And sure, they might be importing migrants but the migrants can't hang. They are not civilization-builders or civilization-managers. Stick around, have tons of kids, run for office, and you will win and hold ground on what many present consider to be "enemy territory."
Once the boomers pass on, and the abysmally-low lib TFR catches up to them, the future is realistically ours in the "blue states."
This is no doubt a 100x more strategic move than moving to TN or TX or SC like every other Californian is doing -- because if you do that, you'll wake up in a newly-minted blue state with newly-minted blue state problems.
Wait until he finds out about breakfast
Replying to @MerriamWebster
Do you have evidence to back this up? If so can you explain what “good night”, “good morning” and “good evening” are alterations of?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The etymology of "goodbye" as an alteration of "God be with you" is documented in dictionaries and etymological references. "Good morning," "good night," and "good evening" originated as "good" plus the time of day, sometimes as ellipses of wishes for a good period.
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/goo…
etymonline.com/word/good-bye
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/goodbye
etymonline.com/word/good%20mo…
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/good_night
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/good_even…
Lane Scott retweeted
You aren't supposed to get your childlike wonder back. That was created for you in part by the adults who loved and cared for you. Once you grow up, it's your turn to give it to someone else.
Trump times not what they could or should have been.
But idk if pre-2016 GOP is even tolerable.
Ted Cruz?
Are there no other options?
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
I love how the advice for girls version is just "lower standards expect less you don't need to like him but you do have go out with him."
The first post was all about how boys can make an effort to be more pleasing to potential mates and the reply is like "not getting murderer vibes? Say yes to that date."
The biggest problem in our culture is that parents and society do not think they can make boys do anything; so the solution is always to tell girls they have to make due with less, and change their parameters. No one is ever telling the boys to go out with girls they don't like, lol
Attention Young Women:
I am surrounded by 20ish-year-old guys who want to date and get married. They are smart, capable, hard working and cute. They're hesitant to ask girls out or don't know where to find the good ones. If you are one of the good ones, here's what you need to do.
Step 1: Change your expectations about how you'll meet. You might've built a story up in your head about the first look that resembles a plot line from Gilmore Girls. It won't happen like that, and your insistence that it be instantly Instagrammable is knocking a lot of good guys out of the dating pool.
Step 2: Get fit. You don't need to be a size 4, but this generation of young men is serious about stewarding their bodies and they want a woman who cares for hers.
Step 3: Grow your hair out (and don't dye it blue). It may sound superficial to you, but these young men want a girl who is feminine, and long locks are an indicator that you are.
Step 4: Go clean your list. You are probably too selective about who you say yes to because you evaluate a coffee offer with the seriousness of a marriage proposal. So you say "no" when he asks for your number if he's an inch too short or three years too old, or does not yet make six figures, or wants to have a farm someday or doesn't want to have a farm someday. Ditch your list. As long as he does not creep you out, if he has the guts to ask you on a date, say yes.
Step 5: Sign up for any event where you know like-minded guys will be. The local Young Republicans mixer, a hiking group, a lively singles youth night at church. If you're not seeing these guys, it's because you're not situating yourself where these guys are. Change your routine.
Step 6: Get a gym membership and dress modestly. That not only accomplishes step two, but it puts you in regular contact with a lot of guys who are working to better themselves. But don't set a thirst trap. Stand out by wearing workout gear that draws attention to your face, not your cleavage.
Step 7: When the guy who you see every Wednesday and Friday, who has given you pointers on better form for your RDLs, asks for your number, unless you genuinely feel unsafe, give it to him.
Step 8: When he calls you two days later and asks you out for coffee or dinner, say yes. Even if you don't "like" him. This matters for two reasons. 1. You are conditioning him to initiate, and that will benefit you if you date long-term, or benefit other women he asks out in the future because you conditioned him to associate the risk of asking with the reward of a "yes." Hopefully some other girl is building up your future husband's confidence by saying yes when he asks her on a coffee date. 2. You don't actually know who you like. 50% of women marry a guy where there was no initial spark. They did not know they liked him until they saw him for a few weeks or a few months.
Step 9: IMPORTANT - learn to flirt. That doesn't mean licking your lips suggestively or wearing a miniskirt. It means singling him out for attention. A guy is much more likely to ask you on a date if you've signaled that you will say yes. You do that by making eye contact, smiling at him, and responding to any small "bids" for connection.
Step 10: He may not get all the dating etiquette exactly right that first time. He may not show up with flowers or open the door for you. But whatever he does that is commendable, notice it and thank him for it. A woman's greatest power is not bossing and directing, it is responding to and encouraging masculine energy in the right direction through sweetness and precise validation. Don't knock a sincere guy out of the running because he didn't execute a date perfectly. On the first date, the third, the fifth, you are evaluating for worldview alignment and character. Not elaborate planning for your night out.
1/2
Lane Scott retweeted
One of our local churches decided to start ringing the bells again this year, and it absolutely slaps. Those medieval folks were on to something using bells to keep track of time.
Lane Scott retweeted
What has happened to the WSJ?
I’ve subscribed for years.
But the financial information is largely gone - and a concentration on markets, investing and economics has given way to Politico style blogging.
The Bureau Chief is a former Washington Post lefty who has hired former Politico and Huffington Post activists to cover economics.
It’s not working.
They have reporters now who don’t understand finance.
You open the app in the morning and all you see is political commentary and partisan attacks.
It’s become a paid Politico style publication and everyone knows it.
It’s fallen - and needs to go back to its roots of economic reporting. There are too many left wing political commentary outlets already.



















