You cannot claim that enforcing immigration laws is the sole responsibility of the state then expect citizens to accept endless excuses when that responsibility goes unfulfilled. The question is simple, If the state alone has the authority to enforce immigration laws who holds it accountable when it fails? You cannot demand obedience to laws that your own institutions appear unable or unwilling to enforce. You cannot invoke constitutional authority as a shield against criticism while offering no convincing account of enforcement, oversight or results. The people shall govern is not an election season decoration. It is a democratic principle that requires public officials to answer to the very people whose authority they exercise. A government cannot monopolise enforcement, evade accountability and then pretend that public frustration is the problem. If the state alone must enforce the law then let the state demonstrate that it can. The authority you so loudly proclaim comes with a responsibility you cannot simply talk your way out of.