न कश्चिन्नापराध्यति। You don't know me, you just know what I want u to know!
India
Joined December 2023
- Tweets22.3K
- Following223
- Followers346
- Likes32.9K
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Men must earn, provide for and protect the woman. In return, the woman owes him nothing. That's women's lib.
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Colin is correct. Any current professors who are not Woke are the older ones and they are soon to retire or are already being pushed out. What will be left are all the DEI hires made over the past 10 years.
I've been telling the right for a while now to stop prematurely celebrating the supposed death of wokeness.
I wasn't trying to be a buzzkill. And it wasn't out of some need to spread fear to maintain my supposed anti-woke grift. It just became clear to me that there was a major disconnect between reliable indicators of its ideological spread and its outward expression.
In 2020, there was a major push to change the ideological makeup of our institutions from the ground up. It was wildly successful. But those changes at the level of graduate students, postdocs, and assistant professors in science, medicine, and law needed years to incubate before they could fully wield their power.
Today, six years later, many have now received or will soon receive tenure, or become doctors and lawyers. The older, non-woke professors are increasingly outnumbered or retiring. Nearly all new hires are still woke, because woke people control the job searches and hiring committees. It's a woke ratchet.
By 2028, those who entered academia during the woke hiring spree of 2020–2022 will have largely moved into tenured positions.
Our institutions have never been more woke. Trump has simply delayed their plans by a few years. What we're seeing now, after the right getting a thorough midterm beatdown, is the woke beginning to test their newfound strength. What can they get away with saying (e.g., Dave Chappelle and Jennifer Welch)? Can they still cancel people over absurd accusations of racism (e.g., the Ole Miss girls making monkey noises)?
They've been training in the off-season, but they haven't yet tested their strength gains in the real world, because flexing prematurely would only invite federal scrutiny. They're emboldened now and will continue testing their strength through 2028. If they win, they'll go all-in and unleash the woke tsunami.
You don't understand how insane it will be. I don't either.
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
There’s a 150-year-old bar that still doesn’t allow women in Kolkata, which has invited comments from women across India
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Madras HC says women seeking maintenance for children cannot be called gold diggers.
Cool. Then hand the children to the father who can actually afford their future.
Why keep the kids, refuse to let the father raise them, and still demand money in their name?
That’s not “for the child.” That’s using the child.
Women Seeking Maintenance For Children Cannot Be Labelled 'Gold Diggers': Madras High Court
livelaw.in/high-court/madras…
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Co-parenting becomes impossible when one parent is more interested in control than the children's well-being.
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Did you forget.
Atul Subhash had to sucide due to such unethical n un justified word from a such a position person.
#JusticeForAtulSubhash
#AreMenSafe
@realsiff @SamSiff @SaveMenToo_ @FightForRigh715 @Try2StopME @strife4rights @ViranthR11120 @_dharam_vir
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
How do family court lawyers sleep at night knowing they are robbing men of their children for money?
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
How can this be ordered? 👊
This is against all norms!
Just because they can does not mean they should do it violating all propriety.
Law must apply equally to all.
Very bad me Lords 😡
दूसरों को बोलो गुड़ मत खाओ
और खुद गुड़ की भेली चट कर जाओ
अंधेर नगरी
चौपट काज़ी
[BREAKING] Delhi High Court exempts lawyers and court staff in NCR from ban on non-BS VI vehicles
report by @prashantjha996
barandbench.com/news/delhi-h…
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
INTRODUCING: THE PROTECT MEN ACT 🇺🇸
For too long, the law has failed to adequately protect innocent men, husbands, and fathers from the devastating consequences of knowingly fabricated allegations of rape and sexual assault.
One false accusation can destroy a man’s reputation, career, marriage, financial security, and relationship with his children.
The Protect Men Act would establish:
• Class A Felony: 20 years to life in federal prison for knowingly and intentionally fabricating allegations of rape or sexual assault.
• Civil Accountability: Full restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, and asset forfeiture where legally authorized.
• Statutes of Limitations: Enforceable deadlines for bringing criminal charges, with no prosecution permitted after the applicable limitations period expires.
• Due Process: Full protection of the presumption of innocence, the right to confront adverse witnesses, and the requirement that guilt be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Good-faith complaints remain protected. Knowingly false accusations do not.
A man’s name is his reputation. His labor provides for his family. His liberty belongs to him. None should be taken without due process of law.
Protect fathers. Protect husbands. Protect families. Protect innocent men.
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Unpopular opinion: Divorced women, separated women, and women struggling to manage financial pressure and corporate life seem to have a serious problem with housewives who are happily living with their husbands.
The jealousy is almost visible.
And these are the very women hiding behind the drama of feminism, turning another woman’s personal choices into a battlefield. Imagine being this insecure.
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
It is a crime to be born a Man in India.
They should be jailed, their parents should be jailed.
#MensRights #BananaRepublic
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
झूठे केस भी करो, पैसों की डिमांड भी करो और केस भी ऐसी दूर जगह करो जहाँ पति और उसका परिवार पहुँच ही न सके! आखिर ये कैसा कानून है? क्या पुरुषों के लिए सुकून से जीना भी गुनाह हो गया है? कब रुकेगा यह कानूनी उत्पीड़न? #MensRights #JusticeForMen #FalseCases
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Boomer generation Men are biggest b@$tard MF generation of men who extorted Dowry from their FIL & Alimony from their SIL.
Boomer generation Men are the prime reason of lacs of men’s sueiceide.
He died by suicide, driven to it by the harassment of his wife and in-laws.
Another Atul Subhash—
Prawal had married Sneha Gupta about a year ago, in November 2025. Soon after the marriage, disputes and friction began between the couple.
His wife started insisting on living separately from his family and also demanded that the entire property be transferred into her name.
When Prawal refused to give in to her demands, she colluded with her maternal family to file false cases of dowry, assault, and harassment.
The wife would misbehave with his mother, sister, and father, and physically assault Prawal.
Before committing suicide, he recorded a video detailing all these things.
Today, I want to say something to all men who are harassed by their wives:
Do not commit suicide. You might think that recording a video and ending your life will get you justice and punish your wife, but you are making a huge mistake.
Atul Subhash made the exact same mistake; he also recorded a video and took his own life.
To this day, his killers have not been punished, and the murderers are still roaming free.
Ending your life does not solve problems; instead, it leaves your family members in even deeper grief.
There are no laws to protect men, but we must not lose hope. We must fight back courageously, and mark my words, one day victory will be ours.
Whenever the thought of suicide crosses your mind, just think: --why should I end my life because of that worthless woman—the very life for which my parents struggled so hard to raise me and make something of me?
Do not throw away that invaluable life for a two-penny woman.
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
Imagine the audacity!
UPSC AIR 177. IPS officer. And then she puts her own husband and his father through this!
In Shivangi Bansal @ Shivangi Goel v. Sahib Bansal (2025 INSC 883), the Supreme Court recorded that her husband spent 109 days in jail and his father spent 103 days.
The Supreme Court had to direct her and her parents to publish an unconditional public apology in national English and Hindi newspapers and on social media.
The marriage was dissolved under Article 142. Connected proceedings were quashed. She lost alimony and maintenance.
Imagine the audacity!
Dragging your husband and his elderly father into criminal litigation, seeing them spend months in jail and then being ordered by the Supreme Court to apologise publicly!
And this is an IPS officer with AIR 177!
Men, think twice before marriage. A fancy degree and a prestigious designation mean absolutely nothing if the person lacks basic character and accountability.
Don’t let someone’s qualifications blind you to their character. You and your parents may end up paying the price.
SIFF-Man4Men retweeted
यह माननीय SC का rape का एक
classic judgment है जो
आज के trial court और high court
के female centric approach का जीता-जागता उदाहरण है ?
कैसे एक 64 साल राजनीति में सक्रिय औरत पिछले 30 सालो से 1996 से अपने पति से तलाक लेने के बाद कई मर्दो के साथ living-relation में रही उसपे बलात्कार, domestic violence जैसे कई मामले में उलझाए रखा उससे पैसे लिए और ऐस मौज करती रही और trial court और
high court इसको तमाशा बनाता रहा ।
30 साल बाद इस आदमी को Supreme court से न्याय मिला वह भी SC के top Criminal lawyer के argued करने पर जिन्हे हर कोई आदमी hire नहीं कर सकता है ?
क्या सही में आम आदमी को न्यायपालिका से न्याय मिल रहा है?
