6hrs of Codex usage used up 88% of my weekly $200 pro 20X limits.
I am done with Codex and Openai
It was fun while it lasted
Used up 20% of my weekly usage since the latest Codex reset which was 90 minutes ago. @thsottiaux I thought you were doubling usage with the new codex upgrades/updates not cutting it in half further.
Also just to give a bit more context, I'm still on the pro 20x that still has about another week before your new $200 plan takes effect. Once the new $200 plan takes effect that would mean I will use 40% of my weekly usage limits in 90 minutes.
There is no way I keep my 4 $200 accounts if they get 200 minutes of usage each. There's literally no reason for anyone to pay $1/min when there's other providers out there that are just as good or better for much much cheaper.
This laptops limits are 46 agents running in parallel. Now I need to get my other laptop, my Mac mini and my VM running agents simultaneously as well and have all my agents and devices coordinating the shared mission together
Cutting usage limits in half will 4x the "reset" replies Tibo gets on X which will 4x the amount of money X pays Tibo and since Elon Musk owns X and has beef with Openai, OpenAi found a way to make Elon pay them
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
What if humans just have main character syndrome, and the real reason ASI scares us is because deep down we know we might not be the main agents anymore - we might become the subagents
Intelligence is what created nuclear weapons. Therefore, intelligence is more powerful than nuclear weapons, which means the race for AI supremacy may ultimately be even more important than the race to develop nuclear weapons during the Manhattan Project.
Instead of U.S. AI labs competing against one another, they need to work together for the greater good.
U.S. AI labs fighting over who "wins" is like different branches of the U.S. military fighting against each other instead of working toward a common mission.
Let's forget about "winning" and "money" for a moment and think about the future of the human race and prosperity for all.
@elonmusk
@sama @DarioAmodei @finkd @sundarpichai
I have the solution to solve all of their fears 馃憞







