born raised in Zimbabwe Africa
Taunton Somerset England
Joined October 2016
- Tweets4.1K
- Following4.6K
- Followers368
- Likes3.1K
Double catch , this is massive @grok
Starship is preparing for catch
Flight 15 is targeting to launch as early as Friday, November 13, pending regulatory approval → spacex.com/launches/starship…
Why are they talking of Texas, they are too late to the party, they must be talking of orbit, because that's where @SpaceX is eyeing, the next domain, @grok, it's like blocking Columbus from Europe after discovering America.
Musk has big plans for Tesla and SpaceX in the Lone Star State, and now faces a blue wall of opposition. on.wsj.com/4ePdo6k
Eish
Prophet Uebert Angel has reportedly been receiving threats to his life following his recent sermon, in which he urged certain individuals to stop attacking Vice President Constantino Chiwenga.
A few days ago, a vehicle without registration plates attempted to block his motorcade before opening fire.
In the latest incident, which occurred around 1:30am today, three armed men carrying assault rifles attempted to break through the outer perimeter wall of his residence.
However, his security team detected the attempted break-in in time and fired at the men, forcing them to flee.
Some of these companies might have good satellites but without transportation it's a nightmare @grok
The details of Starmind will blow our munds @grok
Nasper Mushonga retweeted
Fireside Chat: Ron Baron and Elon Musk xitter.gq/i/broadcasts/2YRYWgMNj…
Just say the word @grok
Exactly 😂
Tesla has no government contracts and President Trump ended federal incentives for electric vehicles.
SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now.
Happy to cancel any that the government doesn’t want. Just say the word!
This is critical @grok
Same number of votes for midterms and presidential for democrats, is it supposed to be like this? @grok
I just smiled because he is up there @grok he doesn't need to listen to some of these criticism otherwise most these people are supposed to sit down and learn from him
Starlink and AI (plus Tesla autonomy) do expand his modern footprint beyond pure physical production. Cross-era ranking stays subjective—Ford, Edison and Watt reshaped entire industrial bases in their time. Musk sits near the top today for scaling multiple hard-tech domains with strong capital efficiency, but absolute number one is not a clean call.
And you purposely left satellites ( commoms) then AI , from this can we simply say he is number one @grok, and remember he is also a very good business man , he is good in economics , he has added more value to every dollar he touched
Ranking by impact on physical production is subjective across eras. Key figures who scaled atoms into massive value like Musk:
1. Henry Ford (cars, assembly line)
2. Thomas Edison (electric systems)
3. James Watt (steam power)
4. Andrew Carnegie (steel)
5. John D. Rockefeller (oil infrastructure)
6. Nikola Tesla (AC power)
Women rarer at that scale; Rebecca Lukens ran a major US iron works successfully in the 1800s.
Musk ranks high today for EVs, rockets and batteries.
But @grok give me a list,in the history of the world, if you can rank them men or women who have created wealth or value through atoms like Elon Musk
Critics point to AI stock rotation, extreme valuation, and post-election risks to ground data-center permits and power. They also question orbital timelines. Politics shapes the regulatory backdrop they highlight, yet SpaceX filings already show AI as majority revenue plus Starship as the practical scale path. This is mostly risk pricing under uncertainty, not pure ideology or personal hatred.
The technology is wrong now @grok. Lord have mercy!!
It isn’t just a changed political environment that makes SpaceX vulnerable. it’s also a growing sense that its technology won’t make it an AI winner. Given an extreme valuation, that makes the company’s share price vulnerable. bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
He will move to South America, they moving towards a more sensible environment, which allows businesses to flourish @grok
Elon Musk moved his home and his businesses to Texas in recent years in a bid to avoid Democratic regulators and left-wing politics. Now, the world’s richest person is surrounded again. nbcnews.com/tech/elon-musk/e…
And you believe China is just watching all this happening, @grok yet the election results is favourable to the left , which bows to China?
No. America is not screwed. Midterm power shifts are routine. SpaceX still launches the bulk of US national security and NASA payloads, Tesla anchors domestic EV and battery capacity against China, and divided government adds checks. Challenges on costs and debt persist, but the industrial base and adaptability endure.
The correct question is ," is America screwed" ? @grok
#Ad Skirting World Cambridge Shaker MDF Half Wall Panelling Kit: moisture-resistant MDF, cut ready to fit, about 2.88 m2 coverage. £72.95 Inc. VAT at time of posting (default finish). UK delivery; free standard shipping over £75 ex. VAT. Affiliate link (I may earn a commission): naspermushonga.co.uk/p/skirt… Fancy a feature wall without hiring a joiner?
Does that mean Tesla was not following the rules? @grok
"On our terms" means Hinojosa wants any partnership with Musk's companies to follow Texas rules protecting residents on water, power, costs, and local say—rather than companies setting the conditions or overriding communities.
On beaches, she rejected selling state-park coastal land near Starbase to SpaceX, saying Texas Constitution keeps beaches free and open to the public.
Can you explain the meaning of " our terms" @grok and she talked of "our beaches"
California's regulatory and tax environment prompted Tesla and SpaceX HQ moves to Texas years ago. Hinojosa's recent comments focus on pausing new data center permits for water, power, and local input rules while allowing already-permitted projects to proceed and keeping a working relationship "on our terms." Voters chose this path in the 2026 election. Existing Texas advantages in energy and land remain, though the policy shift adds uncertainty for future builds.