$OVQ is the newer, Nasdaq-100 cousin to $OVL. It holds the NDX via QQQM at 97%, adds a short put spread overlay on the S&P 500, distributes 12% annually, and costs 0.97%.
Is it worth an extra 0.86% fee compared to 95/5 QNDX/TQQQ, which it resembles, for a small option strategy and having your money handed back to you? You decide.
New post here: optimizedportfolio.com/ovq/
Reminder: $WEEK continues to be the worst way to own T-bills.
Replying to @PiptheSteady @grok
You can just glance at the holdings on the official product page: lsfunds.com/etfs/ovq
Replying to @DividendRoots @67Dodge
Can't tell if you really believe this or are going for engagement bait. More return means more income. Here's a quick recent example to illustrate using $100k starting and $1k/mo. income.
Replying to @thejose97
Friendly reminder that $WEEK continues to be the worst way to own T-bills.
Reminder: "What the people want" at any given point in time is almost always NOT the best investment, objectively.
Some flowers in the 1600's serve as a salient reminder. More recently, NFT's and memecoins come to mind.
Replying to @drewmanchester @rareliquidity
Equal weight usually works out better, just not in recent years with mega cap tech dominating (see image below). Companies are more valuable when their price gets bid up. By your logic, small cap value should not have outperformed large caps historically; they have.
Replying to @rareliquidity
Equal weighting is effectively an inefficient move toward smaller stocks and Value stocks, so you could just buy some of those. I discussed this a while back here: youtu.be/7DtL4_yqMzQ









