Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
How crazy is it, that Monty Python saw this coming before it actually came? 🤣
It amazes me a woman states the obvious that males don't belong in female sports is somehow a ploy to make money. If anyone said this 10 years ago everyone would say "Duh." In 2026 according to 'journalists' writing this lunacy it's a money making scheme. theguardian.com/sport/2026/a…
Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
Brown v. Walker, 1896: a pardoned man cannot plead the Fifth.
Burdick, 1915: a pardon must be ACCEPTED to exist at all.
Fauci pleaded the Fifth.
So he is either a man with no privilege or a man with no pardon.
@JonathanTurley @TPUSA
Thread 👇
Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
LMAO! You're an attorney like Fauci is a scientist. We can all read, but continue your Fauci fan fawning.
What I've learned about the Iran War, and I started out as a skeptic. No longer.
1) The deal Obama signed with Iran was worthless. They don't honor any contract. So in essence Obama gave them billions in cash to continue their terrorism and kill, including Americans.
2) There no way the world should allow the irrational regime of Iran to control 20% of the oil supply
3) We can't bomb them forever, and boots on the ground is a no go, but instead, like any good economist will tell you, you look for alternatives
4) We found the alternative! thehill.com/policy/energy-en…
1
127
Nothing surprises me anymore from radical leftists. Recommending clemency to a neo-Nazi who killed 9 Black church members? These people after all want to elect a guy to the Senate who had a Nazi tattoo.
This is insanity
For months, the same propaganda has been pushed nonstop
First it was 500,000 kids. Then 1 million
Now Ro Khanna suddenly shows up with 4.5 million children supposedly “killed” because of Elon and DOGE
The number keeps growing, but the proof never shows up
Tomorrow they can say 10 million. The number does not matter
The goal is to make people emotional and paint Elon as evil before they ask the obvious question:
Where is the evidence?
Meanwhile, the DOJ literally exposed a real USAID bribery scheme involving more than $550 million in taxpayer-funded contracts
- A USAID official pleaded guilty
- Corporate executives pleaded guilty
- Two companies admitted criminal liability
Let me repeat that
The fraud was not imaginary
Taxpayer money was literally being routed through a corrupt system while politicians kept pretending every dollar was sacred humanitarian aid
And what is Ro Khanna doing?
- Attacking Elon
- Inflating body counts
- Demanding investigations against his fake numbers
But not asking what happened to the billions already sent
Not asking who stole the money
Not asking why the aid machine was so easy to abuse
DOGE’s basic standard was simple:
- Show where the money went
- Show who received it
Prove it actually reached the people it was meant to help
How is that evil?
That is basic accountability
Not one of the people screaming about “dead children” has shown clean proof tying those deaths to Elon personally
But the DOJ has shown proof of real corruption inside the aid-contracting pipeline
That is the part they want you to ignore
And Ro Khanna lecturing Elon about morality is rich
This is one of the most active stock traders in Congress, with thousands of reported trades and tens of millions in trade volume
So the congressional stock-trading class wants to investigate the man asking where taxpayer money went
You cannot make this up
They never cared about the fraud
They never cared about the people caught stealing
They cared about protecting the system
And they cared about destroying the man who dared to expose it
Now Elon suing this lier
You do not get to throw fake death counts at someone, paint him as evil to the world, and then hide behind politics
Elon was never against helping people. He was against blind spending with no proof the aid was actually reaching the people who needed it
The DOJ exposed exactly why that question had to be asked
Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
Congratulations @ElonMusk.
Thanks to SpaceX's IPO, he's the first Trillionaire.
He didn't TAKE money from anyone. He CREATED wealth.
He launched satellites that connect even the poorest, most remote parts of the world.
Our world needs more MAKERS like Musk; fewer TAKERS like:
Musk Makes, Warren Takes
More Makers, Less Takers! Why The World Needs More Elon Musks and Fewer Elizabeth Warrens
Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
🚨READ IT
The Justice Department just secured a superseding indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it reveals some new bombshells
đź§µ1/20
dailysignal.com/2026/04/26/s…
Do you really wanna know how bad the state of California is run, just look at this ballot for governor. This is called needle in a haystack voting. Good luck, finding your candidate!
1
157
Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
Trump insults people. Call it unbecoming or unpresidential, but comparing it to what the left has been systematically doing with its rhetoric over the past decade is absolutely ridiculous.
The left has a system. They demonize and dehumanize a person (usually by repeatedly calling someone a nazi, fascist or racist) and then set out to convince people that the person is a direct threat to their lives.
Every Democrat talking point is geared around painting someone as a threat. Then they preach about the need to resist that evil threat.
That's been the entire Democrat platform for a decade now. That's how they attempt to stay in power. Through fear, not popular policies. They do not care about what happens when someone takes the rhetoric seriously. In fact, they use whatever violence results by claiming it was caused by the person who was attacked.
Joe Biden declared his candidacy for President in 2019 by claiming that he had to run because Trump wouldn't condemn nazis. It was a complete lie but the MSM played right along. Biden then hit the campaign trail and declared repeatedly that Trump was an existential threat to the world. An existential threat. Sounds pretty serious right? Biden said that America could never survive another four years of Trump, that democracy would collapse because Trump was so evil. That was his entire campaign for President and the MSM backed him up.
Gavin Newsom's campaign for President is pretty much the same as Biden's was in 2020. Trump is evil and wants to hurt you so vote for me.
By nature, the rhetoric of the left incites violence because every word is geared towards making people believe that someone is a threat to their lives. Eventually, some people will take that rhetoric seriously.
"But Trump causes it all."
Really? Consider Elon Musk.
The left did not like what Elon was doing early last year so what did they do? They called him a nazi and a fascist. They said that he was pure evil. Then daily for months Democrat politicians claimed that Musk was out to hurt people and their families. They told people that Elon was trying to directly hurt them. They accused him of stealing Medicare money and pensions so that he could enrich himself. Think about how ridiculous that was. Still, they repeated it over and over again and they had the help of the MSM. They accused Elon of stealing grandma's money so he could add to his bank account. They accused him of killing people all around the world. Everyday on CNN there was a new BS claim about another 10,000 people somewhere that starved because of Elon.
Reminds me of the ubiquitous Covid death counter that magically disappeared when Biden became President.
The MSM repeated the Democrat talking point. "Elon is killing people and he's trying to hurt you."
Then the protests started. The paid agitators hit the streets and did what they do. People were marching in the streets, calling for Elon's death. I've posted clips of everything I'm writing right now. It's all true. Do people forget the guillotine shirts and posters at the Elon protests?
Eventually, some people became so fearful and INSANE that they couldn't even look at a Tesla without trying to destroy it. Same as the reaction the crazies used to have to the red hats. Then the crazies turned on the Tesla owners. They started following them and attacking them. It became a risk to drive a Tesla in a major city. People were wiping feces on Teslas. Think about how insane one has to be to do that. Then people started firebombing Tesla dealerships. They were bombing dealerships. The entire time Democrat politicians and the MSM just kept repeating the lines that Elon is a nazi and he's out to hurt people.
Elon was only heavily involved in politics for a few months but if he had continued, somebody would have tried to take his life. Guaranteed.
The MSM downplayed the violence. MSNBC and CNN kept repeating the lie that the protests were peaceful. People started claiming that it wasn't just the left, it was both sides. Both sides were doing it. Sound familiar?
Then a bunch of Democrat mouthpieces and politicians brought up...you'll never guess...January 6th. "This is no where close to as bad as the insurrection!" I've posted the clips.
The late night shows cheered on the violence. Jimmy Kimmel made jokes about it and passively encouraged people to keep attacking Tesla dealerships.
The left has a system. They paint people as threats and encourage people to fight those threats. That's the Democratic platform and it's been that way for a decade. It's what Biden ran on and what Newsom is running on. Do not compare it to insulting or ridiculing someone. There is no comparison.
Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
Replying to @RepMikeLevin
Hello Representative Levin,
I'd like to introduce you to an organization called the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
NDI is one of the four core institutes of the National Endowment for Democracy, established by Congress in 1983. It is the Democratic Party's official international arm. Its board members include Stacey Abrams, Donna Brazile, and Michael McFaul. Its previous chair was Madeleine Albright, who served until her death in 2022. Also on the board: Eric Kessler, founder of Arabella Advisors, the largest dark money network in Democratic politics.
NDI reported $181.5 million in revenue in fiscal year 2023, nearly all in government grants.
NDI's mission, for four decades, has been to tell countries around the world how to run democratic elections. And what NDI consistently tells them, across dozens of countries, is that voter identification is a fundamental pillar of election integrity, and that proving citizenship is a basic prerequisite for participation.
Here is what NDI has demanded of other countries:
NDI's foundational guide, Building Confidence in the Voter Registration Process (2001), describes voter ID systems as standard democratic infrastructure. It states that voter registries should contain "voters' photographs and even their fingerprints" and that registered voters should be issued "a voter or other ID card that serves as proof of their right to vote." NDI explains that "issuing ID cards, either national or voting, requires a second point of contact between election officials and voters, which introduces an additional safeguard into the system." (pp. 10–11, 15)
NDI's 2015 study of voter registration across the Middle East and North Africa goes further, laying out that voters must "prove their identity, essentially demonstrating that they are who they say they are" and must "affirm their citizenship and age." (p. 11)
That same 2001 guide identifies married name changes as a routine voter roll maintenance challenge: "Election officials must update information about people who have moved or who have married and changed their surname." NDI also notes that voter lists "may omit information about changes of address or name for those eligible people who have recently moved or married." NDI's recommendation is not to eliminate voter ID. It is to maintain clean, continuously updated voter rolls that accommodate name changes within the system.
In its 2009 Bangladesh report, NDI praised the country's new photo-voter list and national ID card system, noting that the ID cards gave "a sense of empowerment and belonging to the disadvantaged and marginalized people of the country, particularly women."
Read that again. NDI itself called voter identification empowering for WOMEN!
In every case, NDI's position was identical: marriage-related name changes are a solvable administrative problem. The solution is better record-keeping and updated systems. Not fewer safeguards. Not the elimination of voter ID.
Your party's own international arm has already solved the problem you bring up. The answer is: maintain the rolls. Update the records. Issue the IDs. Accommodate name changes within the system, don't use them as a reason to have no system at all.
The exact opposite of what you push here - refusing to clean voter rolls.
By NDI’s own standards, by the standards of your own international soft power branch, YOUR position is the anti-feminist position.
The SAVE America Act asks Americans to do less than what NDI demands of Nicaragua, less than what NDI praises in Morocco, and far less than the biometric fingerprint-and-facial-recognition system NDI supervised in Nigeria. Eighty-four percent of Americans support photo ID to vote. Two-thirds of Democrats support it. Jimmy Carter's own 2005 bipartisan commission recommended it.
You voted no. Your party's international arm, funded with taxpayer money, chaired by your party's former Senate leader (Tom Daschle), staffed by your party's most prominent voting-rights advocate, says yes. For everyone else.
NDI's guides are publicly available on their website. You might consider reading them before you spout mindless drivel to protect your own grift.
Owlen--A Sowell Man retweeted
School district pays $650,000 to Christian teacher fired for refusing preferred pronouns: lawyers justthenews.com/node/175201?…





























