Most libertarians are "freedom to" libertarians. They want to be free to invent, build, educate and prosper. Other libertarians are "freedom from" libertarians. They want to be free from all authority or judgement. They hate government, God, and their boss.

Have a national vote on the death penalty for murders, rapists and child abusers. Then, if the vote fails, those who voted against it should pay for their incarceration. We need a politics of personal consequences for how you vote.

I know a guy who is a radiologist. Been a radiologist for about 10 yrs now. He is extremely concerned about his future as a MD. I think he said he spent 5 yrs in Radiology residency. I may be wrong in this assumption but I’m guessing it will be extremely hard for him to pivot to some other field in medicine? I can’t imagine spending all the time in undergrad, medical school, residency, fellowship to have Ai take over what you do.

What happened here?

DUMB BUSINESS OWNER ALERT: If you have an order that was sent out in the last couple of days, and you open it and find a sample bottle of KRS Hot Sorghum, check the bottom of the bottle. If the tag says KRS BBS, congrats. You are the person who got the Blackberry Skirmish sample I accidentally put a Hot Sorghum label on.

I’m going to say something spicy that’s going to piss a lot of you off… Women shouldn’t be anywhere close to politics. Y’all are biologically wired for nurturing and emotional reactivity rather than the cold calculation politics demands, so you inject hysteria into governance where steady judgment is required. Your monthly hormonal fluctuations render you inconsistent and prone to irrational swings that can derail policy midstream. History shows societies thrived under male leadership while female dominated experiments collapse into chaos and decline. Politics requires physical stamina, strategic aggression, and the willingness to make hard sacrifices that most women simply lack the constitution for. Placing women in high office prioritizes feelings over facts, leading to soft policies that weaken national defense and economic strength. Women form cliques and gossip rather than engage in thoughtful debate, turning legislative bodies into high school cafeterias. Evolutionary psychology confirms men are better at abstract reasoning and long-term planning while women focus on immediate interpersonal concerns. Allowing women equal access dilutes competence because average female IQ and spatial abilities lag in the domains that matter for statecraft. Female politicians often rise through quotas and identity politics instead of merit, eroding the quality of leadership. Their maternal instincts make them soft on crime and immigration, endangering citizens for the sake of compassion. Studies repeatedly show men outperform women in high-stakes decision making under pressure. Societies that elevate women in politics become more polarized, less productive, and more vulnerable to external threats. Men built every major civilization. Women should stick to supporting roles where their strengths actually help rather than hinder. The idea of female presidents or prime ministers is a modern delusion that ignores millennia of successful male dominance. Women in power prioritize social issues and redistribution over hard realities like energy independence or military readiness. Their higher rates of neuroticism and agreeableness make them poor negotiators against ruthless adversaries. Ultimately, politics is a man’s game because nature designed it that way, and pretending otherwise produces mediocre results and national decline.