Assistant professor (tenure-track) @PA_SDU | Citizen-state interactions and the politics of public service provision Bluesky: @ https://xitter.cf/t.co/zjseOKRLoB

Odense, Danmark
Joined May 2018
In new research out in @JPART1991, @_Oliver_James_ and I study whether public service users' responses to performance information reflect (directionally) motivated reasoning or if responses can be explained by Bayesian updating (from potentially incorrect prior beliefs).
3
6
1
26
2,735
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Our paper on the logic of guesses is now out (w/ @NeilBramley and Chris Lucas). We provide a new information-theoretic perspective on many phenomena (old and new) in judgment under uncertainty. 🧵
1
22
3
67
6,681
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Now in @apsrjournal: What do politicians think about their voters? Fielding face-to-face surveys to 982 sitting politicians in 11 countries, and surveys of 12,000 citizens, we find they have remarkably consistent - and cynical - theories of voters: /1 doi.org/10.1017/S00030554240…
5
138
26
489
70,267
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Hvornår valgstederne lukker på tværs af USA dansk tid #usavalg
9
89
12,918
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Experimental evidence from Los Angeles shows parents value school effectiveness even conditional on peer quality, and that social interactions strongly influence school choice, from @cqcampos nber.org/papers/w33010
14
58
10,925
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
The notion of “probability” is both familiar (we use it), and mysterious (we would typically struggle to define it). Here is a 🧵 to remove the mystery and make the meaning of “probability” more intuitive.
62
918
133
4,881
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
🤷Should you include a “don't know” (DK) option in a survey question? ➡️@madselk & @CBWlezien show the exclusion of a DK option can matter, mostly for low-information respondents and on low-salience issues cambridge.org/core/journals/… #FirstView #OpenAccess
28
97
10,515
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
My latest is now up @The_JOP! Using data from @LASchools, I show how electoral incentives can lead to inequalities in school funding. Thx to all who supported this project and provided feedback, especially @vkoganpolisci @payson_julia @LeslieKFinger! rb.gy/u6dcqg
3
21
103
8,960
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Exciting findings about citizen coproduction in "Coproduction of core and complementary tasks in times of service decline: Experimental evidence" by @PeterRDamgaard, Niels Opstrup, & Mette Kjærgaard Thomsen. doi.org/10.1111/padm.12955
1
2
467
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
NEW PAPER w/ @eriksantoro @j_kalla @ronchuli There's a widespread idea that we will persuade other people more effectively if we listen to them first The NYT has said it, social psych says it, & my previous research has assumed it In a new study, we find it's likely wrong 🧵..
14
148
56
575
274,106
I am very happy to share that I have been promoted to tenure track assistant professor @PA_SDU
Replying to @PA_SDU
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard (@PeterRDamgaard) researches service delivery and citizens' behavior as users, coproducers, and voters. Peter was already Asst. Prof. @PA_SDU and has now been promoted to TT Asst. Prof. You can check out some of his work here: xitter.cf/PeterRDamgaard/status/…
21
1,079
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
We are happy to announce that we have hired *three* tenure-track assistant professors who will join us in the Public Administration Research Group (@PA_SDU). All three will be introduced here briefly:
1
4
2
16
3,298
Just put together a simple guide on how to vectorize R plots in PowerPoint. Check out my first Medium article 🥳 nalinan.medium.com/how-to-ve…
It took me SEVEN years to figure out that you can save a ggplot as a vectorized .svg file ggsave("file.svg"). The svg file can be opened on powerpoint and it will be completely vectorized, even text are still recognized as text boxes! No more recreating plots on illustrator!!!!!
10
323
14
1,815
233,795
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Saying an effect size is "small" or "medium" is meaningless. But we didn't have a set of guidelines for saying it better. Now we do, thanks to this awesome piece by @DavidFunder and Dan Ozer--I think everyone doing behav science research should read this. journals.sagepub.com/doi/ful…
7
257
14
690
Very interesting study with implications for marketization and choice in health care services (GPs)
Doctor quality matters a lot. Norwegian study finds that replacing one of the 5% worst general practitioners with one of average quality generates a social benefit of $9.05 million. Via @jonasvlachos. cesifo.org/en/publications/2…
111
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
“Why do some academic articles receive more citations from policy communities?” onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
2
3
3,014
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Great thread on how shocks to natural geography causes prosperity. @ChristianVedel uses two really fascinating historical shocks to Danish waterways that I also recently learned about myself. Very cool stuff!
Does the fundamental natural geography (first nature geography) matter for the location of prosperity? Yes! In a new working paper, I demonstrate this using two separate large shocks to the first nature geography of Northwestern Denmark in the 1100s and in 1825. #econtwitter🧵
2
5
1,272
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
In addition to the general call above (across disciplines), we also have a PA specific PhD call open. The deadline is also October 15th for this call: fa-eosd-saasfaprod1.fa.ocs.o…
4
5
429
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
Interested in pursuing a PhD in public administration (or public policy)? We are recruiting (fully funded!) PhD students and we are especially interested in project proposals within one (or more) of the following themes: Public management, AI/digitization, and Danish politics.
1
9
13
1,319
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
External validity: seeing this more and more in my journal editing. Note that every result is valid to some setting, no result is externally valid to all settings. Let's think about how preferences, beliefs, or constraints differ across the experimental and target setting(s) and have a scientific discussion on how results are hypothesized to change. Let's avoid becoming external validity Zombies in the social sciences. ideas.repec.org/p/feb/artefa…
2
28
3
131
29,508
Peter Rasmussen Damgaard retweeted
So in 2007, physicists wrote a paper that made the headlines: according to their calculations, human coin flips aren’t 50/50 - more like 51/49. Why is that, and did students in Amsterdam really flip 350,000 coins to find out? 🧵
31
213
53
1,317
310,669