Did you know #RomanCatholics & #EasternOrthodox are not only losing more people then they gain (despite the constant narrative they run online), and are on average less pious then many other Christian groups?
See below
I'm in agreement, that video walks through a lot of historical evidence to support the Biblical case.
Self-authenticating nature of Scripture, which is virtually universal among the Church fathers, you say!? youtube.com/watch?v=UVaACUW_… Good stuff.
Joshua Pearsall retweeted
Cya at 9 PM live tonight! (Link below) 👇
youtube.com/live/sLQJ9R4_0lU…
LIVE TONIGHT AT 9 PM EASTERN!
Calling all Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholics, and whoever, bring us your arguments against Sola Scriptura!
@PracticalCL and I are ready!
youtube.com/live/sLQJ9R4_0lU…
Joshua Pearsall retweeted
I used to question whether the Bible teaches universal prevenient grace. Is it true that every person receives some measure of grace inviting them into the process of salvation?
There was a time when I was hesitant to answer that question with a “yes.”
What changed my mind? John 1:9—the light that illumines everyone was coming into the world. The illumination extends to "everyone."
Some reject the view that this illumination is an expression of prevenient grace. The context, however, suggests that it is. John goes on to explain that those who receive the Word are given the right to become children of God.
The illumination of everyone in verse 9 belongs in the same discussion as becoming children of God in verse 12. The context is a theology of salvation.
That’s why I understand this illumination as grace initiating the saving process. Everyone receives the light, even though everyone does not receive the Word.
That distinction helped me come to believe in universal prevenient grace.
I'm not asking you to trust anyone's feelings, but to gain understanding of the argument we put forth. You said above if we think its idolatry it's just a bad translations, we disagree and there are substantial works out that make an argument for that case.
I would reccomend reading a few then. Our contention is that the council is making a distinction that isn't valid, and is putting forth an illicit practice. The larger concern on top of that is demanding it on threat of anathema which is a historical novelty.
I have learned St. Hildegard of Bingen is the person I can thank for pumpkin spice... this might be the best argument for Roman Catholicism I have ever heard.
Have you read the historic Protestant critiques of icon veneration and our interactions with Nicea II and it's claims?
Person 1 - "Nietzche speaks of this."
Person 2 - "No he didn't, have you read any of his books?"
Person 1 - "No, did you?"
Person 2 - "No."
Replying to @Soupy_ @_captainswish
Nicea II, the entire council, and two commentators' notes. Henry Percival from NCPNF Volume XIV, and Richard Price's more recent translation and commentary.
Replying to @PracticalCL @kangminlee
Christian men, I can't spell 😂
Replying to @kangminlee
I mean plenty of Christianen say really wild things, so what I'm hearing is we should just nuke all the podcast.
Replying to @_captainswish @Soupy_
We reject what Nicea II calls veneration, not "what we think veneration is."
Replying to @MethodMinistry
He wasn't the first, and won't be the last.
Replying to @MethodMinistry
I bet Joshua Pearsall is going to run from the debate.
Joshua Pearsall retweeted
TWO DAYS AWAY!
This Friday, live at 9 PM!
Bring @PracticalCL and myself your best argument against Sola Scriptura!
youtube.com/live/sLQJ9R4_0lU…
The superscriptions (or titles) of the Psalms found in the manuscripts have many odd features that indicate something beyond them is happening. And contrary to popular thought they are part of the manuscripts, there is no evidence they were ever lacking.
substack.com/profile/1613112…
Replying to @mporeilly
I have so many 😂. One major one is original sin. I used to deny it and hold to something more alon to modern EO ideas of ancestral sin, thankfully I've been corrected on that one!





