Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction) header
Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction) profile picture

Leading the charge to keep prediction markets accessible to everyone. Views are the Coalition's own.

Joined November 2025
Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)Photo by Coalition for Prediction Markets (@PredictAction)
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Last night, the power to decide what America sees changed hands. I have spent a ton of time in DC over the last few months. The elites were certain the markets were off. I heard many variants of “no chance markets are right about X” and “I’ve been in politics for a decade. ‘These people’ don’t really know much.” Last night, ‘these people’ beat the elites. Prediction market favorites won 479 of the first 487 races. That’s 98%. The elites live in a bubble. They theorize, write, ideate, and mistake credentials for an understanding of lives they’ve never lived. They don’t see and feel what the everyday man, on the ground, sees and feels. Knowledge is not exclusive to the elites but scattered across millions of people. Someone knows their hometown better than any national pundit. Someone has followed a local race passionately for months. Someone has followed a local race dispassionately for months. Someone notices a shift in their community before it makes the headlines. Someone is shaped by an incident at work. Someone is shaped by what’s getting harder or easier for their families. Each holds a piece of the picture that no expert can see in full. And for the longest time, that knowledge had no way to reach the rest of the world. For generations, election night meant turning on the TV and waiting for a handful of people to tell you what happened. Prediction markets change that. You don't need a title, a large following, or an editor to publish you. All you need is a perspective and the conviction to back it. That changes who holds power over information. Anyone can see the market. Anyone can contribute to it. Anyone can question it. No title gives you the final word. No gatekeepers can filter your view. Sometimes the signal can be wrong. But anyone can challenge the consensus and improve it. And when people consolidate their knowledge together, something remarkable happens: millions of individual perspectives become a signal that we all can learn from. Over the last few months, the people showed up on Kalshi to tell the world what they were going to do. Last night, the megaphone was passed to them.
198
172
111
3,485
1,201,418
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Excellent performance from prediction markets this election. RWers kept insisting they were rigged. But the wisdom of crowds did an excellent job of forecasting.
12
15
1
732
20,066
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Markets over noise. For far too long, we’ve relied on polls, pundits, and experts to tell us what America thinks. But the truth doesn’t belong to a select few. It belongs to everyone. Prediction markets put power in the hands of the people, turning millions of independent opinions into a collective view of the future. No gatekeepers. No central authority deciding what’s true. Just real people putting their conviction behind what they believe on a free market. Because the best way to understand what America thinks isn’t to handpick a few voices and give them a megaphone. It’s to let the market speak.
51
80
20
1,119
223,446
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Bloomberg's @TheStalwart lays out why he trusts prediction markets: "I doubt any of us know more than what people bet." "Markets are really good conventional wisdom distillers, and that's actually very valuable." "People will say that as a sneer. They're like, oh, this is just conventional wisdom. And I'm like, no, that's actually really good." "You say candidate A is favored over candidate B. Well, is it 55% or is it 80%? Now we actually have a number that we can put on it." "When a market has a Democrat at a 40% chance of winning Texas, my view is you got to take that seriously."
5
10
3
839
31,868
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Questions I'd like to understand better about states rights vs federal pre-emption for prediction markets. Could a state decide it does not want its residents to have access to the stock exchange or 401k plans? If prediction markets are regulated as financial markets, what is the difference?
21
5
1
290
11,278
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
.@SeanPMaloney on prediction markets: "It's you and me trading as counterparties... with a neutral exchange we're transacting on that's taking a small fee." Sportsbooks kick out winners. Markets don't. "By the tens of millions, the consumer has said, 'We'd rather do it that way.'"
1
1
6
650
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
"Historically, America has frowned on monopolies and protected free-market competition. Why drop this principle for the sake of the gaming industry?" 🔥 @mansourtarek_
Yes, a bet and a trade often look similar. But how they work is fundamentally different. A sportsbook sets the odds and takes the other side of your bet. Prediction markets are markets, where buyers and sellers compete to discover and produce efficient prices and enable important public benefits. What the market is about can change, but the structure doesn't. My op-ed on prediction markets and regulation:
1
3
2
24
3,492
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Regulate polls, not prediction markets. There’s no evidence that betting harms election integrity, but fake surveys have done so this year, write Harry Crane @HarryDCrane and @KolemanStrumpf on.wsj.com/4i8zIKq
19
26
29
744
183,339
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Prediction markets are transparent, both in their incentives (people want to make money and avoid losing money) and their method (free markets aggregating millions of opinions). Polls are not.
Regulate polls, not prediction markets. There’s no evidence that betting harms election integrity, but fake surveys have done so this year, write Harry Crane @HarryDCrane and @KolemanStrumpf on.wsj.com/4i8zIKq
30
44
7
638
121,868
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
CEO and co-founder of @Kalshi @mansourtarek_ fireside at @CFTC @KState AgCon. “Markets don’t lie”. Prediction market tools complement traditional market structure - to illuminate and hedge risks not captured by the incumbents.
3
1
10
950
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Kalshi CEO @mansourtarek_ joins @nickgillespie to discuss why prediction markets are fundamentally different from sportsbooks, why states are trying to regulate them, and how prohibition drives markets offshore on the Reason Interview. reason.com/podcast/2026/10/2…
3
3
2
7
2,412
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Fraud and manipulation know no borders. The @CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets for this reason. These exchanges are interstate businesses that match the bids and offers of customers from across the country. Congress equipped the CFTC with the tools needed to enforce uniform standards, surveil and police fraud and manipulation, and protect customer funds across state lines. @LizClaman
24
46
1
213
7,576
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
U.S. Election Trading Prediction markets have a much longer history with elections than with sports. The data goes back to 1880. Now U.S. platforms have handled more than $2 billion in U.S. election trades in 2026 alone. 🧵
1
4
7
1,511
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
"1880" Another reminder that prediction markets have been with us since the 19th century
Are prediction markets biased by white men? Republicans? Young people? Dartmouth professor Eric Zitzewitz analyzed 145 years of election prediction market data, spanning multiple exchanges and countries. His findings: • No systematic evidence of political bias across different eras, countries, and offices. • No systematic evidence of pricing bias based on candidates’ race, gender, or age in the recent elections studied. • Traders weren’t always representative of the voting population, yet that didn’t translate into systematic bias in election forecasts. The paper points to a powerful mechanism: people who spot a mispriced outcome have a financial incentive to correct it. Even if some participants trade on personal preferences, informed traders keep prices grounded in reality. Open competition incentivizes research, challenges consensus, and gives the best ideas a chance to surface. People are rewarded for being right, regardless of their background or preferences. The paper does find some pricing biases, including slight overpricing of longshots and underpricing of favorites. Its central finding on election markets remains: no systematic evidence of political or demographic bias. In an increasingly polarized world, these markets give us something valuable: an impartial source of information shaped by people with an incentive to get it right.
2
10
1,159
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Beautiful.
34
32
10
403
68,268
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
🚨 @ChairmanSelig is right: Prediction markets are real markets—and the CFTC is the cop on the beat. “They have an order book. They go through a clearinghouse. They function very much like markets.”
3
8
2
22
9,553
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
The debate over prediction markets isn’t whether they should be regulated. It’s who should regulate them. Congress created a federal framework for these markets for a reason: one national rulebook provides clarity instead of a patchwork of 50 different state regimes. North Carolina has never gotten ahead by waiting for other states to understand innovation first. We shouldn’t start now, as I write today in @theobserver:
6
3
20
3,357
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
Kalshi's @robertjdenault on why comparing a prediction market to a sportsbook doesn't hold up: State piecemeal regulations are designed to regulate a casino that chases customer losses. An exchange is the opposite: users set the price with each other in an open, impartial order book under federal regulation, the same model as Nasdaq, NYSE, and CME.
10
2
1
21
4,393
Coalition for Prediction Markets retweeted
New York intends to make event contract derivatives waste away under its iron curtain of state gaming laws before the courts issue final rulings. The @CFTC is required by law to ensure order in the derivatives markets, and that is what we’ve done today. Read more: cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressRele…
25
57
15
475
74,174