PhD in Aerospace. Rocket 🚀 Scientist.
Virginia, USA
Joined March 2021
- Tweets27.9K
- Following1.6K
- Followers11.7K
- Likes5.6K
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
How crazy would it be if Trump gets more done with a Democratic senate and house than he did with a republican one. And all of a sudden we are a unified America....#FLB
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
目前披露出的有關前白宮幕僚長Susie Wiles的大料：
一、Susie Wiles和她的盟友，白宮總統人事辦公室副主任Morgan Dewitt-Snow，合謀阻撓了眾多愛國者獲得行政職位和任命。
二、Susie Wiles預訂在川普總統11月7日飛往佛州期間，在大衛營私下召集親信召開會議，目的是謀求自保、守住權位。該行程現已取消。
三、更令川普總統憤怒的是，她甚至派人向媒體放話，以伊朗戰爭拉高油價導致民心思變為由，將敗選責任引至國防部長Pete Hegseth身上。川普身邊多名顧問告知總統，她的陣營正暗中洩漏有關Hegseth的消息，令川普怒不可遏。一名前白宮官員直言：「Wiles是個大洩密者。」
四、11月5日下午白宮橢圓形辦公室，川普總統極為沮喪並怒吼，將前幕僚長Susie Wiles逐出辦公室！Morgan Dewitt-Snow目睹全程神情慌亂。Susie Wiles當晚遞出辭呈，同時要求留任至明年2月完成交接，但川普總統並不接受。6日便成為她的任職最後一天。
資料來源：班農戰鬥室、每日郵報。台灣媒體有詳細報導，鏈結附在留言區。
VISH BURRA: What I’m hearing is that Morgan Dewitt-Snow and Susie conspired to block NUMEROUS Patriots from admin jobs and appointments…
…I better start getting phone calls coming clean about what happened or I am singing like George Santos at a karaoke bar.
xitter.gq/vishburra/status/21188…
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
Susie Wiles and her close aide were screamed at and kicked out of the Oval Office by President Trump last night, according to Real America’s Voice correspondent Neil McCabe. This was after the President became aware of Susie’s efforts to scapegoat Pete Hegseth for the midterm catastrophe and her leaking info about him to the media.
Presidential Personnel Office (PPO) Deputy Director Morgan DeWitt-Snow was also shouted at by Trump and followed Susie Wiles out of the Oval. Morgan controls staffing for the Trump administration.
Morgan DeWitt-Snow is a Susie Wiles loyalist and donated to Mike Pence’s failed 2024 presidential campaign.
Follow: @AFpost
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
Joe Rogan just hosted his most important episode ever after Republicans lost the midterms as White House insider Calley Means just exposed the real people who are running Trump’s presidency and lists key inner circle names like Susie Wiles, Jame Blair, Richard Walters, and the most powerful lobbying firm known as Ballard Partners:
MEANS: “Susie Wiles is the most powerful chief of staff in modern American history. She has taken a stranglehold on any policy decision. No policy decision gets done without her office giving it the okay. She was one of the top lobbyists in the country. It is impossible to describe to you how demonic this culture is.”
CONTEXT: Means, who resigned from the administration in OCTOBER, says he witnessed an extraordinary concentration of power inside the White House.
He alleges that cabinet secretaries and senior officials spent enormous amounts of time attempting to win favor with Wiles' office because of its influence over which policies could advance.
He then identifies several people he believes were central to that power structure:
SUSIE WILES: White House chief of staff.
JAMES BLAIR: A longtime Trump political strategist and former deputy White House chief of staff.
RICHARD WALTERS: Deputy White House chief of staff and longtime Republican political operative.
WALKER BARRETT: Senior White House adviser with extensive congressional experience.
But the most consequential part of his accusation concerns the CORPORATE LOBBYING INDUSTRY.
Before entering Trump's White House, Wiles had a career representing corporate clients, including working at the influential Washington lobbying firm BALLARD PARTNERS.
And the money involved in that industry is staggering.
According to federal lobbying disclosures, Ballard Partners collected approximately $88 MILLION in lobbying revenue during 2025, more than QUADRUPLING its reported revenue from 2024.
That made Ballard one of the highest-earning lobbying operations in Washington.
And in MAY 2025, the watchdog organization Public Citizen identified SIX FORMER WILES CLIENTS that had reported lobbying White House offices during the administration's first three months.
Those clients included companies involved in tobacco, automobiles, fertilizer, and other major industries.
The White House disputed suggestions of improper influence and said Wiles generally did not participate in meetings or decisions involving former clients.
Those disclosures establish real corporate lobbying relationships.
They do NOT, by themselves, prove that Wiles improperly favored those companies or directed policies for their benefit.
But Means argues that the broader culture of Washington is precisely what Trump promised to confront.
Now consider the extraordinary political timing.
IMPORTANT NOTES: On NOVEMBER 3, Democrats won control of BOTH CHAMBERS OF CONGRESS in a sweeping midterm defeat for Republicans.
And TODAY, NOVEMBER 6, Trump announced that Susie Wiles will leave the chief-of-staff position, with Stephen Miller taking over on November 9.
Trump PRAISED Wiles for her service and said she would continue working for his political operation.
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
.@Timcast predicts a major shakeup on the Right, declaring MAGA dead and Nick Fuentes the future of the Republican Party.
“I’m not condemning or condoning Nick Fuentes’ statements. It’s a forecast.”
Despite backlash, Tim stands by his prediction, arguing that younger voters are shifting the GOP toward America First.
@Dannyjokes @Con_Tomlinson @PhilThatRemains @realTateBrown
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
选举舞弊？还是没有？谁是颠覆共和党的隐蔽力量？川普会借革命小将翻盘吗？听强尼大哥 @RealJohnnyYu 分析。
直播预告：美东时间11/7 周六上午10点，台北北京时间好像是周六晚上11点🤭，跟强尼大哥聊聊，欢迎关注：youtube.com/@wenjiebc1
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
🚨🇺🇸 Nick Fuentes wants the keys to the Republican Party after Tuesday
Fuentes went live after the midterms and told young conservatives to run for office, join campaigns and get hired in the administration.
He wants Susie Wiles gone, too.
Then he got to the part the GOP should actually worry about:
“We will defeat the left if the establishment gets out of our way. Otherwise, we’ll sink the whole f***ing thing.”
A few years ago most people tuned him out. Not anymore.
Hasan Piker is pulling in the same crowd of young guys on the left every night, and right now those two streamers are doing more to shape where Gen Z ends up than either party.
Writer: Daniel
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
There are a lot of “hoaxes”, but none are democrat.
The biggest hoax was the one pulled on the American people.
Enough is enough. We are going to lose our republic if we keep going down this path.
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
Has the Lord departed from the mighty Samson?
When God abandons a nation (a person)…
youtu.be/Cz8AA_Oa0EU?si=7Uba…
“大利拉對參孫說：「你既不與我同心，怎麼說你愛我呢？你這三次欺哄我，沒有告訴我，你因何有這麼大的力氣。」
大利拉天天用話催逼他，甚至他心裏煩悶要死。 參孫就把心中所藏的都告訴了她，對她說：「向來人沒有用剃頭刀剃我的頭，因為我自出母胎就歸神作拿細耳人；若剃了我的頭髮，我的力氣就離開我，我便軟弱像別人一樣。」
大利拉見他把心中所藏的都告訴了她，就打發人到非利士人的首領那裏，對他們說：「他已經把心中所藏的都告訴了我，請你們再上來一次。」
於是非利士人的首領手裏拿着銀子，上到婦人那裏。 大利拉使參孫枕着她的膝睡覺，叫了一個人來剃除他頭上的七條髮綹。
於是大利拉剋制他，他的力氣就離開他了。
大利拉說：「參孫哪，非利士人拿你來了！」
參孫從睡中醒來，心裏說：「我要像前幾次出去活動身體」；
他卻不知道耶和華已經離開他了。
非利士人將他拿住，剜了他的眼睛，帶他下到迦薩，用銅鍊拘索他；他就在監裏推磨。”
士師記 16:15-21 CUNP-神
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
MAGA is dead… forever.
It’s not just 2026.
It’s 2028.
Vance can’t win. Rubio can’t win.
You are all so incredibly clueless.
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
BEST IVERMECTIN INTERVIEW: Dr.John Campbell
Clip: Turbo Cancer in the COVID-19 Vaccinated
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
🇷🇺🇨🇳🇺🇸For a Yalta2.0, Russian Academician Sergei Glazyev says:
"The issue now is not the division of a post-war world, but rather its preservation—specifically, agreement on rules for the peaceful coexistence of states within the emerging multipolar system."
Here is the interesting part:
"The historical analogy looks like this: the 🇺🇸United States today is reprising the role of Great Britain, attempting to maintain its global dominance; 🇨🇳China, like the USA at Yalta, seeks to sustain its transformation into a leading global power; and 🇷🇺Russia, like the USSR, requires Victory to ensure its own survival and sovereign development.
Consequently, the motives of the participants also differ. Trump is in the most difficult situation, in that he is not backed by a national consensus.
It is now known that at Yalta, Churchill was harboring a grudge—the treacherous scheme Operation “Unthinkable”: to accept a separate surrender from Germany and, in alliance with the remnants of the Wehrmacht, launch an assault on the USSR to destroy our country. This would have been a repeat of the attempt made after the First World War, when the former Entente allies launched an armed intervention aimed at dismembering Russia into spheres of influence.
Trump, driven by the idea “Make America Great Again,” has similar motives: to strengthen the U.S. position in its rivalry with China, at the expense of Russia and Europe. He is spurred on both by the historical precedent of the U.S. economic surge that was fueled by a massive influx of capital and talent from Europe during the world wars of the last century, and by the current crisis in the American economy, where the depreciation of fixed assets is outpacing their replacement due to a lack of productive investment. The American ruling elite has traditionally sought to overcome such trends by inciting wars abroad, to secure an influx of resources from the war-ridden nations."
We are on the eve of the US midterm elections, but we don't really know what America we have now or will get afterwards.
Russian economist and academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sergei Glazyev, who lived through the dissolution of the Soviet Union, has observed, in an article published October 27 entitled : “Yalta 2.0: Why Russia, the U.S., and China Need to Agree on New Rules for The World Order.”
“The contemporary world order is undergoing a systemic crisis, driven by the shift in technological and world economic paradigms. Not only is the old architecture of international security collapsing; the economic centers of power, the financial system, the technological leaders, and the very principles of international engagement are all changing. The transition from an imperial to an integral world economic paradigm began with the dissolution of the USSR and is now culminating in the collapse of Pax Americana.”
"The old international institutions are no longer capable of providing stability, while new ones are taking shape amidst a struggle between the old and the new centers of power. During the previous shift of world economic paradigms, this struggle was mediated by the First and Second World Wars—conflicts instigated by Great Britain in an effort to hold on to its global dominance. Although Britain achieved its objectives in the First World War, the Second World War resulted in the disintegration of its colonial empire, and the world transitioned to a bipolar imperial world economic paradigm with centers in the USSR and the United States.
The current transition is likewise unfolding through a world war, during which the ruling elite of the United States seeks to preserve the global hegemony it established following the collapse of the USSR. Although this is a hybrid war, in which the main front lines run through cognitive-informational and economic-financial space, its flare-ups may transition at any moment to the conflagration of a nuclear war. Military actions Ukraine and Iran, the systemic crisis in Europe, financial and trade wars, the erection of technological barriers, and an arms race involving artificial intelligence may appear to be isolated problems. But in reality they are interconnected by the overall process of the shift of world economic paradigm.
This is precisely why there is now a historical necessity for a new “Yalta,” whose historical agenda should not be carving up the world among a few powers. Its task, rather, is to agree upon rules for peaceful coexistence in the polycentric world that is taking shape."
The idea here is not geopolitical advantage—this is not a Yalta seeking to divide the world. The idea here is mutually assured, durable human survival, through the creation of a new security and development architecture.
🇨🇳China, a civilizational nation, is a technological and economic powerhouse. It is seeking to assist, using the ideas discussed in President Xi Jinping’s Global Governance Initiative, in bringing about peace in Southwest Asia and the Horn of Africa.
English Translation: eir.news/p/8eed372b-68a0-4fc…
original: vedomosti.ru/opinion/columns…
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
Long post worth the read. I have a close friend who flies private jets. He flew Lear 60 for over 15 years and now flies a Gulfstream. This is a copy and paste of his response to me asking him if he thought Ice was the issue.
“We always fly in ridiculous cold temperatures.”
“Usually you get the bad ice when the temperatures are like 0 to negative 20. Believe it or not, there's a point where it gets too cold for ice. At negative 40, you pretty much can't get ice. Besides that, the airplane is equipped with hot wings and hot tail.”
“I flew the Lear 60 for like 15 years. It's a no joke airplane and probably the most dangerous airplane I've ever flown. It has a super critical wing. The airflow has to be perfect. When it gets into rough air and turbulence, it will easily stall. It has stalled on me at 41,000 feet just because we got into some turbulence. (On the way to Palm Beach as a matter of fact. ) we recovered and got her flying again around 30,000 ft. Scary
But here's the problem. This airplane has a terrible coffin corner. (At high altitudes) what that means is, you fly in a really narrow window where if you lose 20 knots, it stalls. And if you gain 20 knots, it goes into overspeed. The air goes supersonic over the wing and it goes into a high speed stall, or worse, a Mach tuck.
So if you stall, the normal recovery is to push the yoke forward to lower the nose and gain air speed again. At low altitude, you can push really hard and recover quickly. But in the 60... if you push hard, it will gain air speed and go into a high speed stall, it doesn't take much. It's very sensitive. The 60 has super short wings that don't make much lift. So then you high speed stall, and the computer is yelling at you... OVERSPEED! So then you pull back and enter a low speed stall. And you go back and forth trying to keep it in the air speed window.
This whole thing is pretty scary. And you should recover basically by using your finger tips using super small corrections. You can't over do it. If you try to muscle the recovery, she gets mad and will become unrecoverable. If she enters a mach tuck. You're done.”
“I taught the Lear 60 to other pilots and mentored them. I told them... this airplane has a soul and it's trying to kill you. Do not ever try to top the weather. Don't go over a thunderstorm. Go around it. If it means a half hour longer, then do it. Going over the thunderstorm will go into turbulence that you might not recover from.
These pilots went right over a thunderstorm. I think it stalled which caused them to drop down into the thunderstorm and ended up in mach tuck. They picked up so much speed that it ripped off the horizontal stabilizer. At that point... chuck Yeager can't fix it.
These same pilots did something similar a couple months ago. ATC got mad at them. They poked the bear one too many times.
This is not a beginner airplane. The Gulfstream would never do this. It has HUGE margins of error and won't stall like that. But then again... it's got HUGE wings. It's a pussy cat.
The Gulfstream is like driving a 4 wheeler. The Lear 60 is like riding a uni cycle.”
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
你知道飞机在万米高空平飞的时候，机尾那对小翅膀其实一直在拼命往下压吗？
很多人以为飞机上了天，所有的翅膀肯定都在向上托举。
机尾那对水平舵面刚好相反，它每分每秒都在向下拽着机尾。
只要机尾这股下压力一松手，整架飞机的机头立刻就会像铁坨一样一头栽下去。
2026年11月1日。
一架从德州奥斯汀飞往巴哈马的里尔 60（Learjet 60）私人喷气机，在佛罗里达州棕榈滩县上空突然坠毁。
机上 9 人全部遇难。
这架飞机原本在 35000 英尺的高空平稳巡航。
机组在无线电里向空管报告：外面零下 47 度，遇到了中度颠簸和轻度明冰，情况可控。
他们申请爬升到 37000 英尺避开恶劣天气。
但在随后的几分钟里，整架飞机毫无预兆地以接近垂直的角度砸向地面。
下坠速度达到了惊人的每分钟 2 万到 3 万英尺。
飞行员在无线电里绝望地喊出了求救信号：我们要撞地了。
地面行车记录仪拍到的画面里，飞机在坠地前，机尾的水平尾翼似乎已经不见了。
很多人的第一反应是：尾翼是不是在平飞中突然折断，导致飞机失控栽了下来？
物理学家兼科普创作者斯科特·曼利（Scott Manley）复盘了无线电与气动数据，给出了完全相反的因果链。
尾翼并没有在平飞中提前断裂。
它是先在视线盲区里结冰失速，把飞机拖入了极度狂暴的超速俯冲，随后才被超负荷的气流活活扯了下来。
为什么会这样？
先看飞机在天上是怎么保持平衡的。
在常规飞机的气动设计里，整架飞机的重心，永远被故意放在主机翼升力中心的前面。
为什么要故意把重心往前移？
为了安全。
一旦发动机停车或者空速下降，重力会让机头自然下垂，靠低头滑翔去重新换取空速，防止飞机仰头陷入致命的机翼失速。
这就意味着，一架正常平飞的飞机，本质上就是一个头重脚轻的跷跷板。
主机翼是中间那个支点，沉重的机头每时每刻都想往下栽。
靠什么把机头撬平？
就靠机尾那个横向的小翅膀，也就是水平安定面与升降舵。
机尾这副小翼面，本身就是一副倒装的机翼。
它在空中产生的是向下的负升力，通过把机尾死死往下按，才把前面的机头稳稳撬在水平线上。
跷跷板弄明白了，接下来就到了那个致命的问题：高空结冰，为什么专挑机尾下手？
当时这架里尔 60 正飞越雷暴云顶，周围充满了过冷水滴。
机组坐在驾驶舱里，往窗外扫了一眼主机翼，机翼结冰并不严重。
飞行员在无线电里跟空管说的也是：轻度明冰，情况可控。
但流体力学在这里开了一个残酷的玩笑。
物体在气流中飞过时，表面能撞上多少水滴，取决于迎风面的曲率半径。
主机翼又大又厚，高速切开空气的时候，会在机翼前方推起一团看不见的高压气流垫。
气流流线提前向两侧散开，那些轻小的水滴跟着流线滑走了，很多根本撞不上机翼前缘。
但机尾的水平尾翼完全是另一回事。
尾翼面积小，翼面极薄，前缘的曲率半径极小，锋利得像一把裁纸刀。
细薄的前缘根本推不起气流缓冲垫。
过冷水滴带着惯性直接硬撞上去，迅速在尾翼前缘冻成一道粗糙的冰棱。
机组看着眼前的主机翼觉得还算安全，几米开外、视线看不到的机尾上，冰层已经在疯狂疯长。
机尾结了冰，会发生什么？
冰层彻底破坏了倒装机翼的光滑外形，原本贴着表面流动的气流开始大面积分离。
尾翼向下按压的负升力急剧缩水。
前面的机头立刻开始往下沉。
为了把下沉的机头重新拉起来，飞行员或者自动驾驶仪只能拼命向后拉杆，把升降舵向上偏转。
在倒装机翼上，升降舵向上抬，就是在加大舵面的有效迎角，硬挤出更多的下压力。
可是冰越结越厚，舵面就必须越抬越高。
这套系统立刻被逼进了死胡同。
第一种结局，是操纵杆已经拉到了最底，升降舵偏角彻底打满，下压力却依然不够，机头不可挽回地往下栽。
第二种结局更要命：为了拉起机头，升降舵向上偏转的角度太大，直接超过了临界攻角，整副水平尾翼彻底失速了。
在航空力学里，这叫平尾失速。
平尾失速发生的那一瞬间，机尾向下的按压力瞬间彻底清零。
失去了向下的牵引，前面的机头就像失去了平衡的千斤顶，瞬间以狂暴的力量向下猛扣。
整架飞机像一发炮弹一样扎进了垂直俯冲。
如果是一般的机翼失速，飞机失去的是向上的升力，飞行员受过的所有肌肉记忆都是推杆低头、加速找气流。
但平尾失速是一个完全反过来的恶魔。
它失去的是向下的力量，机头本身就在疯狂往下栽。
在三万多英尺的高空，引擎还在推，重力还在拽，飞机以每分钟两三万英尺的断崖速度朝地面狂飙。
飞行员在急剧下坠中被狠狠抛向座舱，无线电里只剩下绝望的呼喊。
在极速狂飙的俯冲中，速度表彻底爆表了。
里尔 60 的最大设计允许速度，指示空速是 340 节。
而在失控的俯冲中，这架飞机的指示空速冲破了 400 节，马赫数飙到了 0.88。
在接近中低空的稠密大气里，机体以 0.88 马赫疯狂俯冲。
叠加雷暴天气里的剧烈气流颠簸，整架飞机承受的动压和气动载荷，瞬间砸穿了结构极限。
狂暴的气流开始在尾翼上激起剧烈的气动颤振。
地面视频里拍到的水平尾翼缺失，正是发生在这个阶段。
尾翼并没有在平飞中提前断裂。
它是被尾翼结冰诱发的致命俯冲，推到了 400 节以上的极端超速状态，最后被狂暴的空气动力硬生生撕扯下来的。
九个人，一架高性能公务机。
这场悲剧的源头不在发动机，也不在机身结构老化。
它始于一个藏在云层与视线死角里的气动死锁：
越是锋利单薄的迎风边缘，越容易在高空神不知鬼不觉地冻结水滴；
而一个靠机尾下压来维持平衡的系统，一旦失去向下的拉力，整架飞机就会在几十秒内，被自己沉重的机头拖进深渊。
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
ATC AUDIO of LaserJet 60 Crash 🤯😳😳
@liveatc
Johnny Yu 強尼大哥 retweeted
I was at the Canton Fair Oct 17-18!
The most notable highlight of this year's 140th Canton Fair is the full implementation of the concepts of "innovation," "sustainability," and "intelligence," with artificial intelligence and robots playing a leading role.
I got to see that in spades!
Exoskeletons (like this one where I am/it is riding the bike)...advanced language translation glasses, bulk equipment of every type and 30,000 manufacturers....
This is what every Nation needs.
This is how you build qualified optimism.
This is how people know they have a future--even when everything isn't perfect.
This is the future if we get our leaders (I'm in the USA) to shift gears and get out of Middle East conflicts, European conflicts, domestic party political conflicts and put "The General Welfare" of our own Nation in the forefront AS WE POSITIVELY ENGAGE with other Nations, like Russia🇷🇺, China🇨🇳, and many others.
Engage, not dictate.
Cooperate, not control.
Differences don't have to define the relationships, they can enhance them.
Thanks to my friends at the @cantonfair for helping me to see what the future can be. Guangzhou is a place everyone should visit @Discover_GZ @PDChina
