'Guess you think you're an authority figure there, huh buddy, rulin' over your little booth. You know these are the limits of YOUR life, man, you pathetic POS'
Florida, USA
Joined May 2019
- Tweets86.7K
- Following6.2K
- Followers5.5K
- Likes88.3K
Pinned Tweet
WHAT'S THE POINT, GOD?
So ... before the Creation, god exists all alone for some period of time (does it make sense to talk of a 'period of time' for something eternal?) & then decides one day to create the material world we now know. He creates numerous solar systems, planets, moons, empty space, etc., including one special planet (out of thousands, millions, billions?) on which he will create life. On this planet, he creates numerous forms of life, including humans, as well as all manner of bacteria, viruses, natural catastrophes, etc., that can kill all these forms of life (including humans) in brutal & painful ways.
He makes humans dependent of certain levels of food, oxygen, shelter, & clean water for survival but fails to provide enough of it so that all humans can live comfortably for the length of their lives. This in turn requires humans to often fight & kill each other over these scarce resources in order to survive.
In addition to this material world, god creates heaven & hell, where a certain part of humans (their soul) will spend eternity after they die (a god-mandated phenomenon). Humans in heaven live in eternal bliss; in hell, eternal torment. God decides who goes to which place, ostensibly on the basis of how god judges the overall 'goodness' of the life each human lived, w/'goodness' possibly meaning nothing more than a true belief in god's existence.
Of course, if god is truly all-knowing, he knew from the moment of creation how many, & who, would end up in hell. And even if he didn't know that (meaning he's not all-knowing), he knew billions would end up in hell because they would fail his test for getting into heaven. Plus, this material world, in which humans live temporarily, will eventually dissolve/explode/be consumed by fire/whatever, killing all then-extant humans & leaving behind ... what exactly? Three possibilities:
1. the same Nothing that existed (or didn't exist?) before the creation (i.e., Everything vanishes)
2. the material world (all the solar systems, etc.) still exist but w/o any life at all
3. the material world exists w/everything it now contains except human life
Why would 2 or 3 be the answer here? Or, for that matter, 1? If 3 is the answer, would human life evolve again (as it did before?). If so, what's the point of the Apocalypse?
Indeed, god, what exactly is the point of ALL of this?
MAYDAY! MAYDAY!! MAYDAY!!!
Attention all members of the Soros Deep State & followers of his Plan 2050:
THEY'RE ON TO US!! They've figured out how we rigged the 26 elections & now Blanche/Patel/Pirro/Habba are coming for us.
Initiate Plan Destroy Evidence (esp part 2 of the 2015 update) immediately.
KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT.
Flee the country if you can.
And stay off X; Elon is watching & he's getting suspicious ...
MAGA-world is in the process of convincing itself that
1. Massive fraud occurred in 26 midterm, in essentially all states
2. Trump knew that would occur & he 'let it happen' as a planned trap, which
3. he will be springing soon, which will result in mass arrests, the takedown of the Deep State, & the total destruction of the D party.
Not sure how all the concessions by losing R pols, & the lack of any official complaints (much less any litigation challenging the results), fit into this theory. Nor is it clear how MAGA is gonna explain it when none of that happens. But stay tuned; I'm sure the explanation will be a doozy ...
'O! When will they ever learn?'
Pete Seeger
and there it is, folks; they're on to us (initiate Operation Destroy Evidence immediagely) ...
xitter.gq/RichardClip/status/211…
4:
Here are the primary official source links for the documents referenced in the above 👆 thread, particularly around the Law of War Manual and related authorities.
Department of Defense Law of War Manual (Chapter 11 – Military Occupation)
The current version is the June 2015 Manual, updated July 2023. Chapter 11 covers military occupation (sections 11.1–11.7 and following address when occupation law applies, the legal position of the occupying power, duty to ensure public order and safety, and authority over inhabitants).
•Official PDF (July 2023 update)
media.defense.gov/2023/Jul/3…
•Internet Archive full copy
archive.org/details/dod-law-…
•DTIC record
apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/trecm…
•Wikimedia Commons PDF
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F…
Note on scope: Chapter 11 addresses the law of belligerent occupation of foreign territory during armed conflict.
It does not authorize domestic military operations inside the United States or the displacement of civilian government for election purposes.
The manual itself states that occupation law generally does not apply to non-international armed conflict, mere invasion, or post-war situations outside the specific conditions of the Geneva Conventions.
Related DoD Authorities
•DoD Directive 2311.01 – DoD Law of War Program (implements the Law of War Manual)
irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/d2311…
Executive Order 13848 (Foreign Election Interference)
Signed September 12, 2018. Declares a national emergency over foreign interference in U.S. elections and authorizes intelligence assessments and sanctions.
It has been continued annually and remains in effect.
It does not authorize military seizures of voting equipment, cancellation of elections, or domestic military operations.
•Full text (eCFR / Federal Register)
ecfr.gov/current/title-31/su…
•GovInfo compilation
govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD…
•2026 continuation notice
govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD…
Statutory Limits on Military Involvement in Elections
Federal law strictly limits military presence at polling places:
•18 U.S.C. § 592 – Prohibits troops or armed men at places where elections are held, except when necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States.
•18 U.S.C. § 593 – Prohibits military interference with election officers or election processes.
These statutes are the controlling domestic legal constraints.
They are not overridden by the Law of War Manual or EO 13848.
Regarding The Law of War Manual PDF and EO 13848 as the documents being referenced in the operational narrative.
For accuracy, it is useful to note that Chapter 11 of the Manual governs occupation of foreign territory, and that 18 U.S.C. §§ 592–593 place clear limits on any domestic military role in elections.
FINISH THE JOB IN IRAN
Some say Trump needs to 'finish the job' by keeping the pressure on until Iran regime collapses & Iranians 'take back' their govt. Such bravado may sound good, but ...
What would 'collapse of Iran regime' look like? Riots in the streets, 100s of 1000s, millions, of refugees trying to flee the country? Going where? Starvation, desperate people robbing & killing each other for food? Infants & elderly dying horrific deaths for lack of medical care & food?
How long will this 'collapse' take to achieve? Who are the 'Iranians' who will 'take down the govt'? Will any other 'Iranians' try to stop that? What % of population on each side? How will both sides try to achieve their goals? What kind of weaponry will be needed & who has those weapons now? How will those have now have no weapons get them? From who?
How much bloodshed & property destruction will this cause?
Is it guaranteed that 'good guys' will eventually prevail? Even if it is, how long will that take? & what will be left after the successful 'take down'?
How much will rebuilding cost & who pays? How long will that take?
If Iran becomes a failed state, what effect on neighboring states? Unleash a Sunni/Shia general civil war?
Is it possible that trying to 'finish the job' will prove to be much worse, all things considered, than trying to live w/the current situation (as we have been for 47 years)? May be too late for that anyway. May be the options now are, 'finish the job' (whatever that means) or, in effect, surrender & recognize that Iran won.
50 years ago, we in effect surrendered and recognized that Viet Nam had won. How'd that work out? Would things have been better if we (as some wanted to do) had insisted on 'finishing the job' in Nam?
Don't know about Bo (only Bo knows) but Kelly Kapour will be there; not sure about Ryan ...
This quoted post is unavailable.
MAGA-world is in the process of convincing itself that
1. Massive fraud occurred in 26 midterm, in essentially all states
2. Trump knew that would occur & he 'let it happen' as a planned trap, which
3. he will be springing soon, which will result in mass arrests, the takedown of the Deep State, & the total destruction of the D party.
Not sure how all the concessions by losing R pols, & the lack of any official complaints (much less any litigation challenging the results), fit into this theory. Nor is it clear how MAGA is gonna explain it when none of that happens. But stay tuned; I'm sure the explanation will be a doozy ...
'O! When will they ever learn?'
Pete Seeger
new guilty pleasure: Watching reaction videos of people (esp young musicians) hearing Zappa for the 1st time.
'WOW! JUST WOW!! WOW!!!'
'Never heard anything like that!'
'I can't believe what I'm hearing here!'
'What is this? How can I describe it?'
Welcome to the club
youtu.be/GjHOlF4LQQE
'at this very moment on stage ... the alto sax is blowing its nose ...'
youtu.be/3GBWzbE3ITo?list=PL…
'I picked great R candidates. Not my fault that they're not smart enough to prevent voters from learning their true character'
D. Trump (any day now, probably)
Opinion from FL Sup Ct issued today begins:
'This case has a long and complicated history. Three times, Guzman has been tried and found guilty of David Colvin’s murder, with his first trial occurring in 1992 and the most recent occurring in 2016. That 2016 conviction still stands.
And regarding the punishment for Colvin’s murder, Guzman has had four penalty phase proceedings. Each time, a judge sentenced him to death.'
Not sure this is the most effective use of scarce (at all levels) judicial resources.
If Ds win statewide in red states like TX, KS or OH, what will Trump say about the role of the Rs who control those state govts (some of whom are MAGA stalwarts) in the massive fraud that caused those losses:
1. They're part of the fraud;
2. they're too stupid & clueless to ID & stop the obvious fraud; or
3. both.
I'm old enough to remember when 'I'm old enough to remember' was semi-clever expression acceptable for general use.
I'm also old enough to remember when that expression went from clever to cliched to outright annoying (& a sign of a certain intellectual lethargy).
Please govern yourself accordingly ...
I have no idea why there is Something rather than Nothing, or how life began, or whether human life has some greater purpose (whatever that means). I doubt that I will ever know (at least not in this life).
I do know that none of the explanations I've heard for these things (esp the Abrahamic concept of god) make no logical sense.
VIVEK-ACTON AD
3 possibilities:
1. Acton told truth in 78 & abuse allegations are true.
2. Abuse allegations are false &
a. Acton knows it, i.e., she lied in 78 & is still lying
b. Acton falsely believes allegations are true because she mis-ID'd the perp (not stepdad, someone else), &/or she had mental/emotional/psycho issues in 78 that caused her to unintentionally fabricate the false allegation.
Recalling that the allegations arose in 78, well before MeToo, etc., at a time when kids making such allegations were often just dismissed as liars, anyone w/any experience in these areas sees the obvious overwhelming evidence of veracity. She told cops, social workers, judges (in dependency case) & grand jury in 78, & all seemed to believe her. Stepdad & mom disappeared when indictment came out. Acton's bro corroborates her allegations. No apparent reason to fabricate.
Acton's later history seems to conclusively rebut 2.b.
If allegations are in fact false & mom knows it, it is understandable mom would look to defend stepdad. But if 2.a. or 2.b. is true, mom's abandonment of Acton (& bro, a total innocent here in any event) seems almost as indefensible as mom's decision to choose guilty stepdad over kids. Her 12yoa daughter, FOR WHATEVER REASON, falsely accuses her new husband of awful abuse & mom's reaction is to cut all ties w/daughter forever? Rather than try to help child figure out what's wrong & fix it? This is how a good mom would react to this?
Mom's actual reaction in 78 (& beyond) only corroborates Acton's allegations. Mom knew the score but, likely, didn't (& still doesn't) want to face it ...
As to Vivek running the ad, & Trump et al., defending that, is anyone surprised?
HUMANITARIANS
Some are criticizing Witkoff for calling Trump & Putin 'humanitarians.'
Those critics fail to realize that Witkoff defines 'humanitarian' to means 'someone who subsists on consuming humans.' Cf. 'vegetarian'
King Clip-on Tie retweeted
To my small but loyal audience on here: I’m very thankful for all of you. I just have one request: repost this stuff far and wide until Nov. 3. If we can persuade ppl to VOTE against our Dear Fuhrer’s loathsome enablers in Congress we’ll be doing the republic a great service.
People, I can’t stress this enough: these midterm elections are unlike any we’ve ever had. They’re not about Democrats vs. Republicans. They’re a battle between corrupt authoritarianism and those of us who believe in democracy. You have got to VOTE! 1/2 share.google/UFKoIRt3kPLDuYN…
