For years the Democrats have been declaring that "The Democracy is at stake".....now it truly is!
My biggest concern is that if there is a clean sweep by Democrats of the House, Senate and Presidency in 2028, they will:
1. Make DC and Puerto Rico states to gain a strong majority in the Senate.
2. Open the borders and legalize everyone living in America illegally to cement a permanent majority.
3. Increase the size of the Supreme Court to gain an immediate majority.
This would result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.
All that is needed to ensure this doesn’t happen is 51 Republican senators in 2029. That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election. Other reasons are irrelevant compared to this one.
Scott DePace retweeted
The NY Times is reporting that the Peltola campaign actively sought decoy "Dan Sullivans" to confuse Alaskan voters and draw votes away from the incumbent. According to a staffer, the very people claiming to be "defending democracy" sought to obstruct it. nytimes.com/2026/10/28/us/po…
Scott DePace retweeted
June 2008, candidate Obama: "we'll lower premiums by up to $2,500 for a typical family per year."
That year KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) put the average family premium at $12,680. KFF's 2026 number just dropped: $28,303. Workers alone now pay $7,471, up 9% in a single year, while wages rose 3.7%.
Then 2013 brought the sequel: "For a lot of people, it will be cheaper than your cell phone bill."
Show me the phone plan that runs $2,358 a month. Nine days before the midterms, the party that built this machine is asking for your vote again.
Arsonists bidding on the fire department contract. Competition, price transparency, portable plans. Anything except another rescue from the people who wrote the original.
There are children starving and Bernie Sanders is giving $1 million to some Muslim in Michigan?
Does Bernie hate starving children? Does he hate poor people and homeless people? Think of what that money could have done!
Scott DePace retweeted
15 of 15 New York Social Adult Daycares audited yesterday showed no record of a single meal, activity, or hour of supervision — just attendance sheets.
These daycares are receiving millions from our Medicaid system and providing NOTHING in return —this is FRAUD!
"Sign in sheets already had things filled out for tomorrow, Thursday, and Friday—they're already pre-filling out sheets and billing for people who haven't shown up yet!" —@CMSGov Deputy Administrator Dan Brillman
Scott DePace retweeted
France has FREE health care, paid parental leave, paid family leave, FREE child care, FREE preschool, 5 weeks paid vacation, a 35 hour work week, generous unemployment and housing benefits, and heavily subsidized higher education.
Everything the left says they want AND THEY'RE STILL PROTESTING AND BURNING SHIT DOWN.
The Democrats who fight to stop drilling, refining, permits and pipelines every chance they get, is now complaining about the cost of gasoline!! #Unbelievable
Scott DePace retweeted
Actor David Spade raising awareness that a bill was introduced in California to audit where the $20+ billion dollars in missing homeless money went, it passed but then Gavin Newsom VETOED the bill to block the investigation
Yes, this really happened. He blocked bills for an audit MULTIPLE TIMES
Bipartisan bill AB 2903 (unanimous passed 72-0 in the Assembly, 40-0 in the Senate) would’ve forced annual public reports on where the money went
Newsom vetoed it.
Gavin Newsom also vetoed similar bills AB 2570 and AB 2093
“The same broader problem with people paying taxes in California — The homeless, they lose $20 billion, but they want more money for it. That's why people get tired of paying taxes and going, what are you doing? Gavin Newsom just vetoed a bill asking for an audit of where the money for homeless goes. He said, not a chance. You're not gonna see that. That's the problem.”
Scott DePace retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just BLEW UP on the MASSIVE fake news narrative that he wants Iran to take out Los Angeles or San Diego
"SMALL PRICE TO PAY" meant GAS PRICES, NOT bombing US cities. They should be SUED INTO OBLIVION
"These people are Degenerates, and think they can continuously get away with Fake News!"
"The Fake and Artificial News is out there trying to say that I’m inviting the enemy to bomb San Diego and Los Angeles when, in actuality, what I was talking about was that a temporary increase in the price of Gasoline is a small price to pay for Iran not having a Nuclear Weapon and, if you want to see a big price, can you imagine what it would be like if they bombed San Diego and/or Los Angeles?"
"All I was doing was making a comparison between paying a little more, for a short time, for Gasoline, versus the bombing of our Major Cities."
"Everybody knew that, the Fake News knew it as well, but they continue to go out and say that I am asking the enemy to bomb two Cities that I love. It’s totally clear what I say..."
It was OBVIOUS to anyone who listened to the actual clip this is what he said.
People just crop his words out for ratings.
Scott DePace retweeted
I can hardly breathe I'm so outraged.
Just a few days before Trump said it would be a small price to pay to let Iran wipe out Los Angeles and San Diego, he said it would be a small price to pay to let Iran wipe out Mobile, Alabama.
Letting Iran destroy three cities? This must be the bloodbath he promised before the election.
It's a shame I have to put this but yes this is all sarcasm. I am ridiculing the moronic left.
When you just possibly can't hate the mainstream media enough. Trump should be able to sue over this clear misrepresentation of what he said!
I know the clip of ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ is going around with their lies about Trump and his LA/San Diego comments, but it’s worth spelling out the transcript to see how blatant it was.
Co-host George Stephanopoulos leaned into his true calling as a longtime Democratic Party official: “Also on Iran, the President is sparking a fierce backlash after suggesting a campaign rally that Iran could take out Los Angeles or San Diego, American cities run by Democrats.”
Virulent Trump hater and senior political correspondent Rachel Scott front-loaded her story with over a minute on Trump’s comments, declaring Trump was aiming to spend Monday “defending the war in Iran, but it’s those comments he made about the regime taking out two American cities that is prompting swift and fierce backlash this morning.”
“This morning, President Trump, facing growing criticism after suggesting Iran could “take out” Los Angeles or San Diego, two American cities run by Democrats,” she added.
And now Howard's showing Sydney Sweeney half naked! It's like a big circle!
This quoted post is unavailable.
Scott DePace retweeted
The people who keep assuring us that non-citizens are not voting in our elections sure do seem pretty upset about today's Supreme Court ruling that says non-citizens are not allowed to vote in our elections.
I think the two of them should form a pact to not trash each other while they both run for president. Whoever loses becomes the other's VP.
Ok, I am asked and asked about Rubio and 2028. I thought I answered it a while back, but here goes:
Rubio will likely not run in 2028. He may be Vance's running mate, however.
Should the ticket lose the general election in 2028, Rubio will run for the GOP nomination in 2032, as well a long list of others, some of whom are quire strong.
If Rubio does run with Vance in 2028, and if the Democrat wins (God forbid), Rubio will have a more difficult time winning the nomination in 2032, having been on a losing ticket the prior election cycle.
If a Vance-Rubio ticket runs in 2028 and wins, then obviously Rubio can make a run at the top spot in due course.
Rubio may also choose not to run for anything in 2028, back the GOP ticket, and wait for 2032 to run. If I had to guess, and it is a guess, he'd prefer this potential path.
Don't bet on anything. Just my thoughts.
Scott DePace retweeted
Here's a look back at how some of the self-proclaimed "news organizations" covered VP candidate JD Vance versus how they covered VP candidate Tim Walz.
See if you can spot the difference.
See If You Can Spot the Difference Btwn Coverage of Vance/Walz Rollout
Scott DePace retweeted
Memory Hole Politics: 10 Times Leftist Presidents Locked Out the Press (THREAD 🧵)
The left wants you to believe that revoking White House press credentials is an unprecedented assault on democracy. Their manufactured outrage is pure theater. Progressive administrations have spent decades weaponizing executive power to silence dissent, punish critical coverage, and banish conservative reporters from public view.
Here are ten documented times Democrat leadership locked out or purged dissenting journalists:
Replying to @ginamilan_
Yes. In October 2009, Obama White House officials deliberately tried to exclude Fox News from a multi-network interview pool with the TARP pay czar. Emails show them saying “we’d prefer if you skip Fox.” Other networks refused to proceed without Fox, so it was reversed. Aides later confirmed a willingness to freeze Fox out of interviews.
Yes. The administration regularly barred independent photographers from many events and released only official White House photos instead. Nearly 40 news outlets, including the WHCA, protested this in 2013 as replacing independent journalism with visual press releases.
Scott DePace retweeted
I thought @jaredkushner gave a spot on magnificent answer to the really nasty-toned question from @RichardEngel . Kudos to Jared 👏👏👏👏👏
























