⌁𝑆𝛥𝛱𝐷𝐻⌁

Estaré escribiendo la segunda versión de ESTATRIX. Una más completa y de la cual estaré conversando por aquí. Como meta espero que sea un libro y logre plasmar mi filosofía para quien guste leerlo. Saludos 🏴

Soy comunista y no creo en la posibilidad la emancipación humana ni siquiera en una revolución socialista en el futuro. Creo qe la clase obrera ha sido irremediablemente absorbida por el capitalismo y solo le queda vivir una muerte lenta y violenta. Eso no me hace menos comunista

If AI proves that P = NP and we get algorithms that actually run in reasonable time. The whole structure of the economy would shift because so many of the coordination problems that currently require markets, prices and intermediate institutions would become direct computations instead. One of the clearest places this shows up is in the basic question of whether any group of parties should exchange goods or services at all. Today that decision requires searching through an enormous space of possible reallocations. For even a modest number of people and discrete items the number of ways bundles can move, coalitions can form and transfers can clear grows so fast that exhaustive search is impossible. Checking a single candidate deal is easy once the valuations are written down but finding one that is mutually improving or stable is the hard part. Currency has always been a practical workaround for that hardness: a shared measuring stick that lets people price things locally and discover deals without anyone solving the full combinatorial problem. With an efficient method for the search the parties can simply state their valuations, current holdings and constraints and receive a clearing allocation or the minimal transfers that make the exchange work. The evaluation of whether the goods or services should move is then the output of the computation rather than something that depends on everyone already holding enough of a previously agreed unit. Misreporting what you want and the usual problems of private information remain but the need for a circulating medium whose primary job is to make the existence of a multi-party reallocation discoverable in the first place largely disappears. Exchange then coordinates around the ability to solve the allocation problem directly.

AI could give humanity its childhood back. Remember being a kid? You didn’t wake up thinking about productivity. You wanted to explore. Build things. Play games. Learn about the world. Create something just because it was fun. Then you grew up, and suddenly everything became about making money to survive. Imagine a future where that pressure disappears. Where curiosity becomes the default state of human existence again. Where people create because they want to, not because they have to. That’s the future I want AI to build.

Anarchists should support capitalism, particularly the form advocated by the Austrian School, as it represents the most anti-authoritarian system imaginable

Crush the left, and everything is going to be okay. Whole of world history right there.

An internal model at OpenAI has produced a claimed refutation of ETH! Russell Impagliazzo, Mohan Paturi, and I have been asked to help organize an open and independent examination of this claim. 1/4

This is Genie 4, our most realistic and interactive world model yet. 🌐 Explore dynamic environments in real time to see how the scene responds, sounds, and how the people in it move, react, and speak.

she’s so tired of generative ai