SaveFulham (@SaveFulham) header
SaveFulham (@SaveFulham) profile picture

Helping to ensure Fulham’s voice is represented appropriately in Hammersmith & Fulham Borough Council thinking

SW6
Joined August 2020
Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)Photo by SaveFulham (@SaveFulham)
Replying to @GregHands
@GregHands ‘Town Hall’ style meeting about @LBHF CCTV Traffic Scheme

EXIT POLL RESULT: “Who represented you best in meeting?” 84% - politicians arguing to stop the scheme. 16% - @BJ_Coleman arguing to continue the scheme. Read on for @SaveFulham analysis of the meeting...
1
2
1
7
This is absurd. @HFLabour @StephenCowan @LBHF hang your heads in shame! Blocking a residents association that represents heart of the Sands End community simply for communicating a wish not to have their children’s, staff & customer’s lungs toxically poisoned day after day!
The WBRA has also been blocked by @HFLabour I guess they aren’t interested in working with a local business and residents association. A sad representation of democracy.
Utterly disgraceful from the @HFLabour (@LBHF) Twitter account. Talk about doing things TO residents! @StephenCowan, do you think it’s okay for you/your council to bully residents? (Not a 1st offence!) Too many of your councillors are aloof & arrogant.
unavailable
1
2
1
6
SaveFulham retweeted
Replying to @TidewayLondon
@TidewayLondon can you please help me to obtain the air quality data from your air quality monitors on Carnwath Road, SW6. Please let me know who can provide this data to me (from June2020 to present and June2019 to same date 2020)? Many thanks.
4
5
What do SW6 residents & biz's think of suggestion by @WbrAssociation to transform Wandsworth Bridge Rd from smog-filled car-park >>> vibrant destination street?? (In the process addressing the illegal levels of pollution there, currently being made worse by @HFLabour run @LBHF)
unavailable
3
5
Creating schemes that work for ALL Residents/Businesses takes proper consultation & working TOGETHER, not simply being told how it has to be. Here's our rebuttal & proposal to the latest LBHF presentation. wbrassociation.org.uk/rebutt… @LBHF #Fulham #WBR #TCPR #LTN #Traffic #Pollution
2
8
5
10
Any danger someone from @HFLabour run @LBHF could make a public statement about this please? Seems clear on the face of it: a compassionate council ought 2 cancel/refund all these PCNs immediately & make clear it’s stance on ‘match-day’ parking regs during the national lockdown.
Replying to @GregHands
@GregHands @LBHF just walked to bishops park and parking attendants have ticketed nearly every car on the road. In what universe do "match day restrictions" apply when there are zero fans at the game. Made even worse when a trip to the park is one of the only activities allowed!
1
5
@wesleyharcourt ...is this something you are proud of? Is this something you will actually DO something about? @StephenCowan - surely this can’t be right?
2
3
We'll have to assume then that this IS something @wesleyharcourt is proud of! And that @StephenCowan thinks it IS right that residents, their visitors & visitors to a park should be PUNISHED financially for parking near to @FulhamFC on 'match day' during a national lockdown!
1
Hard to understand @LBHF's explanation abt S. Fulham congestion being caused by Wandsworth Bridge lane closures... since it's currently (1) fully open + (2) nationwide lockdown This needs answering urgently or frustrations will go through the roof again! @BJ_Coleman @HFLabour
Wandsworth bridge fully open. Pollution from stationary cars through the roof. Who are you going to blame now @BJ_Coleman @StephenCowan @LBHF help us @GregHands @Sw6Traffic @SaveFulham
...foresight to imagine that any perceived benefit from such a scheme (in terms of lower pollution and/or lower traffic on some residential streets) could be negated quickly by the overall congestion and inaccessibility posed by imagining a scheme like this rolled out across...
1
3
...London. If this does indeed set a precedent... (afterall what borough WOULDN'T wish 2 emulate successes which @LBHF have triumphed so far in speaking of its successes?!) ...then it's surely imperative upon us to think ahead 2 imagining a London full of such schemes! /END
3