chatbot retweeted
Replying to @Hafen_Schelle
Ab wie viel Cm Lippen raus gucken zählt es als ugly Outie? Frage für mein Cousin
chatbot retweeted
Mein Versuch, über vier Jahre russische Vollinvasion in die #Ukraine 🇺🇦 im historischen Kontext nachzudenken, ist bei @LiberaleModerne erschienen.
Wo stehen wir, wohin gehen wir?
libmod.de/fast-vier-jahre-vo…
chatbot retweeted
Replying to @Alinkooy
Дело то не в этом, а в том, что вот живёшь с человеком, а он и не знает что ты такое умеешь и ей это вообще не важно 😀
chatbot retweeted
Some people asked me to share what I just shared in a space about the rate limits. I don't work for Twitter but, I do architect IT cloud solutions as my day job.
It is temporary. Twitter's rate limiting is not what everyone is thinking it is. It is not to punish non-paying users.
"Data scraping" is a big deal. This is where automated systems load the website or app and pull your tweets/data. It's a huge security issue. Automated systems are pulling every tweet/word/user account information to store in an unknown database somewhere else.
This could be state actors like China, the US Government, Australia, or other bad political actors like PAC's that are trying to gain access to everyone's information to analyze and use for nefarious things. Manipulating what is said on the site can be done at scale with data scrapping.
It could also be used to figure out the identity of Anons or to punish people in their country for what they tweet. Looking at you #Australia and #Canada and #UnitedKingdom
The temporary measures of limiting tweets is to protect users just as much as it is to protect the entire Twitter network from going down. They are currently scrambling to get ahead of this and tune their network security to block it from happening again.
It's also important to note that twitter has 500,000+ servers. That's not free. In cloud data centers, the companies that use them have to pay for what is called "ingress and egress" of data going "in and out" of the servers. A data scrapping event that is large enough for them to start limiting means that it was a MASSIVE event that could be considered an attack on the site. It would also put massive load on their servers and cost them so much money it could threaten the site's financial ability to keep running. It could be on purpose to put twitter out of business from cost alone.
Many people are misunderstanding why @elonmusk wants people to pay for twitter or for the twitter API (a programming interface that can pull data for other sites and apps).
The reason he wants people to pay is because if China or porn companies want to create massive bot farms of fake accounts, it is currently free. These bad actors are highly skilled and operate like a business. They have professional staff that continuously change their tactics and Twitter engineers have to fight 24/7 to stay ahead of them. If they have to pay for every account or pay to use the API, it would cost them A LOT of money. This limits the amount of people who could create bots, put automated porn on here, and the hacking/scrapping/DDOS attacks on the site. It protects you.
It also guarantees twitter will continue to exist without bloating it with tons of ads. This is all a part of the plan to create a free-speech place we can enjoy without being controlled by outside actors or advertising companies. I know $8 is a lot to some people but, it is for many reasons. None of the reasons are to hurt or punish people.
#TwitterDown #TwitterLimits #SolutionsArchitect #CloudSecurity #FreeSpeech
chatbot retweeted
Replying to @_MORHFINEBEIBS
Если в начале секса висит хуй, то (к концу секса) он должен выстрелить.
chatbot retweeted
Replying to @Azzi2710
Я играю достаточно хорошо на гитаре, чтобы понимать, что я играю хуёво 😏
chatbot retweeted
This incredibly prescient article was written in 1987, when Chancellor Schmidt didn't even have any idea who Putin was. It shows us clearly that it's not Putin who is the problem, it's the russian mindset.
Here's the link to the source:
de.style.yahoo.com/style/35-…
chatbot retweeted
I wonder if Russian soldiers are confused when they never find any swastikas when invading Ukraine? Or they just don’t care? They just kill anyway? Thoughts?
Wer Waffen und nicht systematische Massaker an der Zivilbevölkerung als Zivilisationsbruch bezeichnet, sollte sein moralisches Koordinatensystem grundlegend in Frage stellen
chatbot retweeted
I've spent some time developing a tool to help you interpret truth and lies in Russia's media. Please share with the needy ⬇️
chatbot retweeted
As a Russian-speaking person of color who was born and raised in Ukraine, I believe that I am in a position to speak on the issue of nationalism and neo-Nazism in Ukraine. A long thread 👇
chatbot retweeted
Matches Season 5 (2022.01.25-03.27 Compressed ver.)
指で触れると赤丸が反応するの、もう暫く続けてみてもいいかなと思いつつ、とくに決めずに。
chatbot retweeted
In short, how Russia's forces are performing in Ukraine is consistent with Russia's historical strategy in war fighting: take heavily losses and hope the other side quits.
[END]
chatbot retweeted
National Geographic Picture of The Year. Black images are shadows of zebras. Zoom in and you will see zebras.
chatbot retweeted
Da ich letzten Sommer sehr oft Moscow Mule gemixt habe, hier meine Einschätzung der russischen Kriegsstrategie: 1/24
chatbot retweeted
I have met so many Russians over the years who had perfect access to free media and lived in free countries but anyway supported Russia's wars and atrocities. Saying there is not a problem in the Russian society will only create future problem when dealing with Russia.
If it was just "Putin's war" we would have a dead bare chested guy with a hunting rifle on the Ukrainian border. No, this is Russia's war against Ukraine. Putin needs millions of loyalists and soldiers to wage a war. They cannot be allowed to escape.
xitter.gq/GicAriana/status/15048…
chatbot retweeted
Mr #Putin
Stop the Satanic war.
Otherwise, you will have no achievement but remorse.






















