Pinned Tweet
You don't have to like Elon to follow the logic in this one. Walk through it with me.
Think about how your city council or county commission works. You can be furious with them, vote them out, and start over. That only works because the people in charge can't rewrite the rules so they never face voters again.
Elon names three rule changes, not policies. Two new states mean four new senators. More Supreme Court seats mean a new majority overnight. Legalizing millions of people at once means a new electorate. Once the filibuster is gone, all three can pass with a bare majority. Statehood can't be undone, and packing the Court just dares the next majority to pack it back.
So ask yourself one honest question. Would you be fine with the other party doing this the next time they held the House, the Senate, and the White House? If not, a check in the Senate isn't partisan. It's insurance.
Here's the part most people miss. In 2028, 34 Senate seats are up, and Republicans are defending 19 of them, including Wisconsin and North Carolina. That map tilts against them. Whatever margin is built this Tuesday is the cushion that's left when the presidency is on the ballot. Win too narrowly now, and 2028 becomes the clean-sweep year Elon is worried about.
It matters for the next two years too. The Senate confirms judges and cabinet officers and decides which bills ever get a vote. Without it, nothing moves.
So vote however you want for the House, for your county, for your school board. Split your ticket if that's who you are. But hold the Senate. Nov 3. xitter.gq/elonmusk/status/211603âŠ
My biggest concern is that if there is a clean sweep by Democrats of the House, Senate and Presidency in 2028, they will:
1. Make DC and Puerto Rico states to gain a strong majority in the Senate.
2. Open the borders and legalize everyone living in America illegally to cement a permanent majority.
3. Increase the size of the Supreme Court to gain an immediate majority.
This would result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.
All that is needed to ensure this doesnât happen is 51 Republican senators in 2029. That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election. Other reasons are irrelevant compared to this one.
Simon Unleashed retweeted
Cameron isnât wrong that church menâs groups often suck.
Hereâs some advice I gave in the REFORGED MARRIAGE BLUEPRINT on how to build menâs groups workshopping marriage.
1. Go first
Your transparency is what gives other men the courage to be honest as well.
2. Start with men you already trust
Nejc didnât recruit strangers. He handed a book to friends on a sailing trip. Think of two or three men who might be open. Small is fine, and two men who are real beat twenty hiding behind masks.
3. Expect resistance
Some will say their marriage is fine when you know itâs a disaster. Others will double down on the conventional wisdom that you know doesnât work, and even spiritualize their rejection of what you have to offer. Donât sell them and donât chase them. Pour yourself into the men who are all in.
4. Make it cost something
Pick a night, set a season with an end date, and expect every man to show up having done the work. What a man sacrifices for, he takes seriously.Â
5. Bring the tape
Abstract problems like âwe donât communicateâ or âshe doesnât respect meâ canât be worked on. A specific moment can. Bring four lines of dialogue from a testy exchange with your wife. Then act it out. Moments that were painful in real life become hilarious when your brothers workshop it, and the lesson sticks.
6. Talk follows action
Every week, every man does something that pushes him. Then he reports what he did, how she responded, how he felt, and what heâll do next. Celebrate wins and workshop failures.
7. Coach others like you coach yourself
The way you learned to lead yourself in steps 3 and 5 is the way you lead your wife. Itâs also the way you lead other men. Donât try to control or strong arm them. Zero in on the core desires and help direct them.
8. Coach each other with a few simple rules
When a man shares, the group helps him with three âfrontline questionsâ that I learned from Mark Queppet:
1What do I want? (find the core desire)
2How can I win? (find a concrete action in your power that you can take)
3Who will I be? (connect to the satisfaction of being more of a man you admire)
9. Curiosity over convincing
If you feel resistance, donât double down and try to convince a guy. Get curious as to why heâs resistantâthatâs normally where the real insights lie. When he finally says âI donât know,â heâs on the verge of mapping out new territory.
10. Make ownership the house rule
The groupâs job is to help each man find his move. A group that complains about wives will make every marriage worse.Â
11. Donât talk about Fight Club
Whatâs said in the group stays there. And donât gush about your new insights with your wife. Show her; donât tell her. She should be responding to you, not to this content.Â
12. Sweat together
If the talking is slow to start, do something hard first. Hike a mountain, haul firewood, or split a few hundred push-ups where nobodyâs done until everybodyâs done. Men open up after theyâve suffered side by side.
13. Pray for each other
Prayer without action is spiritual masturbation. Self-improvement without faith is pride going before a fall. But when men of action, who know each othersâ longings and mission, reach out in faith to God on their brothersâ behalf, it is powerful and effective.
May God give you brothers born for adversity, who hold up your arms when you grow weary. And when youâve overcome, may you strengthen those around you.
A weekly church "small group" where men eat store-bought muffins and discuss their feelings is not brotherhood.
It is a support group for defeat.
Real brotherhood is forged in shared labor, shared liability, and shared danger.
It is men who co-sign on land, trade equipment back and forth, train each otherâs sons, and show up with work gloves and tools when a brotherâs roof caves in.
Davidâs mighty men didn't bond over coffee talks. They fought shoulder-to-shoulder in the cave of Adullam.
Turn your fellowship into an operational phalanx.
Simon Unleashed retweeted
The man who raped me, was arrested but never charged. I had REAL evidence, unlike Russell Brandâs accuser.Â
In my early 20âs after not placing in a bikini modeling competition, I hit the bar to console my hurt pride, then missed my last train.Â
A father who was much older than me, said âMy kids are away from home, you can sleep in their room at my place. Then you can get a train in the morning.âÂ
He took me to other bars and kept buying my drinks. Double vodka and red bull. His friend had tagged along. There would have been CCTV of the man getting me more and more drunk. His friend shared the taxi and heard the narrative that I would sleep in the kids room. There had been NO ROMANTIC activity. The rapist's friend was dropped off, at a different address.Â
The last thing I remember before I woke up with him inside me, was violently throwing up in his bathroom. (The DNA from my vomit on his bathroom floor, could have been evidence that I was too intoxicated to consent.)Â
When I woke up during the sexual assault. I froze. Then passed out again. In the morning when I woke up, the man tried to cuddle me, as if nothing happened. I hit him.Â
As soon as I got to the train station, away from my attacker, I walked up to police officers and burst into tears.Â
I was taken for a medical examination. Swabs were taken.Â
A few days after he was arrested, the police called me. The rapist told them I had consented, he told them we were kissing and cuddling. It would be my word against his in court. So no prospect of conviction. No charges were pressed. The only consolation was that the police said the case would be reopened if he tried it with someone else, if another woman came forward.Â
My rapist walked free.Â
This is despite;
This man being a stranger to me.
A witness to him buying me alcohol. Then taking me to his home drunk. Assuring me Iâd sleep alone, in his kids room, the kid was away from home.Â
Potential CCTV of the man getting me VERY drunk.Â
Vomit on his bathroom floor.
Had they took DNA from my mouth, that would have proven he was lying. He said we were kissing.Â
I went to the police IMMEDIATELY.Â
Forensic evidence from the police medical examination.Â
I was naive back then, but I learned to take care of myself better. I have set internal boundaries for myself. I do not drink to excess. If I go on a date, I insist it is in a public place. I would NEVER invite a stranger into my private realm or go to their home.Â
See why I am not jumping on the narrative against Russell Brand? He has been convicted SOLELY on the word of a groupie. Who says she withdrew consent, after participating willingly in other sexual activities.Â
She showed up at his home stinking of alcohol, she was in active addiction and cheating on her boyfriend. She did not go to the police (despite knowing he would go on to seduce potentially thousands more women.) She had no forensics. She CHOSE to engage in sexual activity with Brand within minutes of first meeting him. On entering his dressing room after a show.
She likely got her pride hurt, she was an obsessed fan, who would have fantasised about romance with him. He discarded her for the next conquest. She likely would have felt rejected, used, naive and GUILTY, she cheated on her boyfriend.Â
How is it that the police didn't have a single call, or even a tip from someone who had heard of the alleged crimes, before journalists started poking around?Â
Had she not spoken to a journalist first (journalists are experts at twisting narratives and sensationalising stories.) Her accusation would not even have reached the police, 17 years later. Thereâs also inconsistencies in her accounts to others, following the alleged incident.
Going to journalists first, undermines the police. The media have weaponised the court, as a mechanism to generate more headlines, to sell more papers. Headlines which potentially prejudiced the jury!
The HUMAN RIGHT to a fair trial has NOT been upheld.Â
Photo: Gregory Mason
Simon Unleashed retweeted
Before I got married, I asked my parents what actually makes a marriage last.
And the more pregnant I get, the more I realize just how critical the man you marry really is.
My parents have been married 50+ years.
Here's what they told me...
1. Make your own money. Marry someone funny.
My dad always said this. Life is hard. Really hard. My parents still make each other laugh 50+ years later. Find someone who can make you smile even when life isnât giving you much to smile about.
2. But is he kind?
Iâd tell my mom all the accolades of my potential gents. Successful, handsome, smart, ambitious. Sheâd only ever respond, âBut is he kind to you?â Good reminder.
3. Find a man, not a boy.
My dad can hunt, cook, fix anything, ride horses, motorcycles, redo an engine and play dang near any sport. He always told me to look for a man, not a boy. Men do manly things.
4. Protectors before providers.
Success is great. Money is great. But when someone breaks into your house, does he stand in front of you or behind you?
5. Look at his circle.
His friends are a reflection of him. Maybe thatâs why my husbandâs friends would be some of my first calls in a moment of crisis.
6. Porching it.
My parents had this idea. Imagine the two of you decades from now, sitting on a porch. No phones. No entertainment but each otherâs conversation. Are you happy? Because eventually thatâs what marriage looks like. Better like the person sitting next to you.
7. Youâre his first. Heâs yours too.
Above your parents, friends. Even your kids. Choose your husband first. My parents always made it clear that they were a team before anything else. Kids grow up but the marriage stays.
8. Watch the little things.
Does he open doors? Shake hands with your parents? Look them in the eye? Pick you up on time? Keep his word? Small respects compound. How someone does the little things is often how theyâll do the big ones.
9. Be best friends.
My parents are. They tell each other everything. They genuinely like spending time together. Somewhere along the way people started acting like your spouse shouldnât be your best friend. Why the hell not?
10. Secrets are cancer.
Donât keep them. Little lies become big ones. And as my dad always says, âThe truth is always easier to remember anyway.â
11. Respect him.
My parents always believed men want respect more than women often realize. Donât belittle him. Donât nag him. Being strong yourself doesnât mean you have to compete with your husband.
And ultimately, do you.
I donât know if these rules are universal. I just know what Iâve seen.
My mom and dad. Both sets of grandparents. My aunts and uncles. No divorces. Just decades of choosing each other, over and over again.
I guess I didnât realize growing up how rare that was.
And now, as Iâm about to become a mom myself, I realize something else. The person you marry isnât just the person you build a life with.
Theyâre the person you build your family with.
And I canât think of many decisions that matter more.
Simon Unleashed retweeted
Bohater policjant z Krakowa przed wstÄ
pieniem do policji byĆ ĆŒoĆnierzem z elitarnej jednostki.
Jak podaje poseĆ Andrzej Ćliwka posterunkowy Jakub Kulik to byĆy ĆŒoĆnierz elitarnej 6. Brygady Powietrznodesantowej w Krakowie. Niedawno zakoĆczyĆ sĆuĆŒbÄ wojskowÄ
i wstÄ
piĆ do Policji. DziÄki wojskowemu wyszkoleniu pomimo rany postrzaĆowej, zneutralizowaĆ zamachowca i zdoĆaĆ samodzielnie udzieliÄ sobie pomocy. Prawdziwy polski bohater.
xitter.gq/SliwkaAndrzej/status/2âŠ
Starszy posterunkowy Jakub Kulik to byĆy ĆŒoĆnierz elitarnej 6. Brygady Powietrznodesantowej w Krakowie. Niedawno zakoĆczyĆ sĆuĆŒbÄ wojskowÄ
i wstÄ
piĆ do Policji.
W dramatycznych chwilach, mimo odniesionych powaĆŒnych obraĆŒeĆ, zneutralizowaĆ zamachowca i zdoĆaĆ samodzielnie udzieliÄ sobie pomocy.
Wojskowe wyszkolenie, niezwykĆe opanowanie i wola walki do samego koĆca. DziÄkujemy!
Simon Unleashed retweeted
đš#BREAKING: A mother in New York just burst into TEARS and started THROWING UP in court after a judge sentenced a man who ST*BBBED her 22 TIMESâŠ
âŠto just 8.5 YEARS in prison
She is left with PERMANENT nerve damage in her hands and face.
Yes, you read that right.
She nearly d*ed, and he'll be out at 31.
Her name is Kaitlynn Berman. She's 23 years old and a mom.
In March 2025, Kaitlynn was in her Wakefield apartment with Joseph, someone she once considered a friend.
She says she was trying to get him to leave.
That's when, she says, he pulled out a knife.
Her words: "He kept stbbing me and stbbing me and st*bbing me over again."
More than 20 times.
He was arrested the next day and charged with ATTEMPTED M*RDER and ROBBERY.
Kaitlynn spent a month and a half in the hospital.
Multiple surgeries.
She lives with PERMANENT nerve damage in her face and BOTH hands.
AND IT GETS WORSE.
In December 2025, Joseph was RELEASED. No bail.
Court paperwork says an email about outstanding discovery went unanswered... so his lawyer asked for him to be let go.
And he was.
A man charged with attempted m*rder went home on his own recognizance while she was still healing.
Then on Wednesday, a Bronx judge signed off on his plea deal.
8.5 years in prison.âš5 years of post-release supervision.
That's it.
Her advocate says she was so horrified in court that she THREW UP.
Please pray for Kaitlynn and her little girl.
WE DO NOT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS!!!!!!!
Simon Unleashed retweeted
The early voting analysis showed a 15 point shift to the blue, consistently, everywhere, when in-person voting starting.
At no point did any of the early vote analysts call out fraud. They were coming up with theories for high propensities voting on Election Day, something I disagreed with strongly behind the scenes.
Iâm not ruling out the possibility of fraud, but the results were consistent with what early vote showed.
Simon Unleashed retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
Or⊠just spitballing here. Donât close the line and keep it going.
Cybertruck is getting more and more popular as people experience it, but this takes time and those of us who own one canât do all the marketing ourselves.
Replying to @WSJPolitics
SpaceX and Tesla have prospered in Texas, because we were not constantly operating under an oppressive and extractive state government.
And I need to be close to the factories, so that I can walk the floor in person. Thatâs why the first major SpaceX factory was in LA and first major Tesla factory was in SF Bay Area.
As California became increasingly difficult, due to extreme taxes and overregulation, we moved our major domestic expansions and HQ to Texas.
Simon Unleashed retweeted
đš What happened to the California EV market?
$7,500 new EV federal tax credit expired
Who lost EV market share?
Models people only bought for the tax credit
Who gained EV market share?
Tesla: up 1,020 basis points
I want to be José
Ron Baron is 83. In front of thousands of investors in New York, he looked at Elon Musk and asked the one question an 83-year-old asks.
"How do you want people to think about you?"
For the full hour before, it had been trillion-dollar chip fabs. Starship. Starlink. The business of the richest man alive.
Then Baron added, quieter: "Nobody would work the way you work just to accumulate money."
Elon paused.
"I'd like the reality to be that I made a significant contribution in the furtherance of civilization."
One sentence. Civilization.
And then, in the same room, he told them about Jose.
Jose is the guy in the meme. One man digging a hole in the road. Eight men standing around watching him dig.
"Unless you increase the number of Joses in the country, the amount of work done does not increase."
"I aspire to be Jose."
"We do actual work."
This from a man who lives in an Airstream parked next to his power plant in Memphis. Who pulls power cables "the size of an anaconda" with his own hands.
Asked how he wants history to remember him, he said civilization.
Asked who he wants to be, he said the guy with the shovel.
The richest man in the world wants to dig. đșđžđ
Simon Unleashed retweeted
Replying to @mazemoore
Well said, Maze.
I think there are a lot of lessons to learn but one we canât miss is that the left does a far better job of creating and selling their narrative than the right ever will.
Simon Unleashed retweeted
I think a lot of people are completely wrong about what caused this midterm "blue tsunami."
I also believe that much of the hyperbolic, misguided analysis is coming from people who have hated Trump for a long time and who have been eagerly waiting with bated breath to declare the end of Trump and MAGA.
"It was obviously the Iran War. Trump didn't put America first. He betrayed America. It was gas prices. Only a fool would think otherwise."
Ok. Fair enough.
Allow me to present a hypothetical scenario. Let's pretend that Trump #2 never started the war with Iran.
Imagine if the price of gas was not around $4.00 a gallon but instead, let's say something low, assume $2.70 a gallon.
Pretend inflation was at a near perfect 2% for the year and GDP was cruising along at a 15 year high.
Assume wages were up and unemployment was at about a 50 year low.
No war. Great economy. That would have won Republicans the midterms right?
That would have prevented Democrats from flipping 41 House seats and 5 Governorships?
Those hypotheticals I listed above are what was happening in 2018 before the midterms. And yet, Democrats flipped 41 House seats and 7 Governorships during the midterms.
The Senate races turned out differently because Democrats were defending races all around the country in 2018. Republicans took back a couple red states. But the 2018 midterms were considered a massive blue wave for Democrats. No Iran War, economy booming, and still, that's how the midterms turned out.
Here's a fun fact. There were approximately 35.5 million Democrat votes during the 2014 midterms. There were approximately 61 million Democrat votes during the 2018 midterms.
25 million more Democrat votes during a booming economy. Do the current criticisms of Trump's second term explain that?
Trump went from 63 million votes in 2016, to 74 million in 2020, to 77 million in 2024. During each of his three midterms (2018, 2022, 2026), the Republican vote has increased substantially. But those increases do not compete with the additional 20 million Democrat vote bumps that happened in 2018, 2020, and 2026.
The question for Republicans becomes why do these gigantic Democrat vote bumps happen. How are they doing it? Is it because people hate Trump? They hate his policies? If those things were true, he would not continually gain support for himself and for the Republican Party.
Without even touching voter fraud, I believe that there is a clear, multi-faceted strategy that Democrats employed in 2018, 2020, and 2026 to drive insane amounts of people to polls, regardless of economic conditions. It's not difficult to identify, but Republicans don't talk about it and certainly don't have an answer for it. And Democrats can do it at will when needed.
Yes Trump won in 2024, but he was the only Republican that would have won and his win was helped by some unprecedented circumstances. Democrats were caught off guard. They did not make that mistake this time around.
Trump's second term has been far from perfect. Lots of mistakes and unforced errors. And once again, many terrible personnel choices by Trump.
That being said, I also believe that things could have been close to perfect right now and Republicans would have still gotten crushed during the midterms. Look at 2018.
Perception is everything. Republicans are not prepared or even willing to step on to the field with Democrats in this regard.
The Democrats are a cohesive, well oiled, united machine working in perfect harmony with the MSM. Together they can create and push any narrative they want to push. Republicans not only have no answer to this, they instead spend their time fighting each other.
Democrats don't argue about policy. They create mass hysteria and fear. It's all emotion. It's their entire platform. Most Americans don't like their policies. But they are playing a game in which policy and ideas and reality do not factor into the equation. And there are very clear strategies that they use to create this mass hysteria and to drive voter turnout.
Republicans are just going to keep helplessly watching this happen over and over again. They learned nothing from Trump's first term. The exact same lies, smears and hoaxes were used again, except this time around they replaced Russia with Epstein. Same game plan to the tee. For example, they created the same immigration hysteria that they did in 2018. Everything happened again.
Democrats were doing No Kings/Fight Fascism protests back in 2018 over immigration. People don't remember this but they were. I've posted videos about it. Bernie proudly declaring "No Kings." The immigration hysteria is especially effective at getting women riled up.
People don't remember Kamala Harris taking a ladder to climb a fence to break into an ICE facility in 2018 or Rachel Maddow fake crying on TV, AOC crying at the fence, or Oprah holding her book club at the border. Protesters literally glueing themselves to the ground in protest (over nothing). A Time Magazine cover with Trump menacingly towering of a crying migrant child. The audio recording of a baby crying that the MSM played on repeat for weeks before the midterms. The British PM Theresa May publicly condemning "kids in cages" (the same cages that Obama built and used).
Republicans just sat idly on their hands and watched it happen all again, making no attempt at rebuttal. Democrats are on TV every hour of every day. Republicans politicians can't even bring themselves to post on social media in defense of enforcing the law. No matter who the next Republican President is, if he or she attempts to enforce immigration laws, Democrats will turn it into a midterm win. Guaranteed. And that's just one weapon in their playbook.
Republicans don't even know how to deal with the sabotage coming from their own side, let alone unite in a perception war with the Democrat Party.
Before the 2022 midterms inflation had reached a 40 year high, gas was above $5.00 a gallon, more people died from Covid in 2021 than in 2020, the botched Afghanistan withdrawal happened, the border was wide open and Biden was struggling to walk and talk. Still, Democrats only lost a few House seats and even picked up a Senate seat.
With all that happening, why didn't 20 million more Republicans vote during the 2022 midterms than in 2018? If economy matters so much, why was there no red wave? Have an election "expert" answer that one.
People who are playing Monday morning quarterback and criticizing everything Trump has done this time around are so not prepared for or even aware of the war that is being waged. They most likely care. They are ok with losing and many just want to declare all things Trump dead and buried. Maybe next election they will decide to fight back against the incredible machine Democrats. Good luck with that.
The Republicans who are so joyfully celebrating the end of "Trumpism" are in for a rude awakening when he's gone. Trump has increased his support and Republican support in every Presidential and midterm election he has been involved in.
I'm going to lay out in another post some detailed thoughts on the strategies Democrats have used to turn out massive amounts of votes and what Republicans might consider doing in response. It's nothing genius but there is a clear, detailed method to the Democrat madness and nobody seems to be talking about it or even care about it.
Granted, I'm just a guy on X who doesn't know much, but it doesn't hurt to post my thoughts so I will.
Elon Musk just exposed a massive inefficiency in the semiconductor industry: chip wafers can spend as little as 20% of their time undergoing actual useful processing
And Tesla is looking to fundamentally change how chips are manufactured
The problem with traditional semiconductor fabs:
âą More than HALF of a wafer's time is spent being transported between machines or waiting for processing
âą In some cases, only around 20% of the time involves useful physical changes to the wafer
âą Semiconductor fabs require enormous capital investments, making manufacturers reluctant to experiment with radically different processes
âą Established manufacturers generally prefer repeating proven manufacturing methods with incremental improvements rather than risking major changes
That means a wafer can spend approximately 80% of its time NOT undergoing useful processing
And this is precisely the kind of manufacturing inefficiency Tesla is targeting
The research chip fab at Gigafactory Texas will experiment with new approaches to semiconductor fabrication, identify successful improvements and transfer them to Terafab for large-scale production
The objective isn't simply to build more semiconductor manufacturing capacity
It's to rethink how the entire manufacturing process works
Less waiting. Less unnecessary movement. More productive processing time.
And when you're manufacturing chips at the scale Tesla is targeting, even modest efficiency improvements can translate into enormous increases in output
Tesla is bringing Elon's first-principles manufacturing approach to one of the most complex industries on Earth
Do you remember when you joined đ?
I do! Itâs been đ longer than it was Twitter. #MyXAnniversary
This is the future of compute.
Itâs getting harder and harder to permit and build data centers on earth so the obvious solution is to build them in space.
Once SpaceX proves it can be done, every company interested in building compute will do it off-world.
Replying to @XFreeze
Information traveling through space in our solar system will ultimately exceed current Earth traffic by a trillion trillion times. People have no idea.
Simon Unleashed retweeted
If youâre right wing and you canât admit liberals (not communists) are way better at art and design and boutique coffee shops and restaurants, youâre not living in reality.
If youâre left wing and you canât admit conservatives are way better at running cities and businesses and police departments, youâre not living in reality.
You step inside a beautiful coffee shop in the PNW and think âman, these liberals are great at this stuffâŠconservatives should take notes.â Then the moment you step outside and trip over a homeless drug zombie shooting up fentanyl on the sidewalk, you think âman these liberals are terrible at this stuffâŠthey should really take notes from conservativesâ
Communists make disgusting anti-beauty art, but classical liberals arenât like that. Put the libs in charge of the coffee shops, put the conservatives in charge of city hall. This is how you get a city that is beautiful, clean, and functional.
If you canât accept that, you need to check your tribalism. We are never getting rid of each other, so figure out how we strike a balance or else the communists swoop in and take everything from us while we quarrel over stupid bullshitâŠwhich is exactly whatâs happening now.
Exactly đ
Tesla has no government contracts and President Trump ended federal incentives for electric vehicles.
SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now.
Happy to cancel any that the government doesnât want. Just say the word!



























