PART 3 of Setting the Record Straight on @KenPaxtonTX “If Ken Paxton couldn’t honor his marriage vows, how can we trust him to honor his oath of office?” Here’s what’s ironic… Some of you aren’t even Christians, yet you’re suddenly invoking the sanctity of marriage as a moral absolute. Okay… based on WHAT? An objective moral law you’re prepared to defend consistently? Or just “muh preferences” because you already don’t like the guy? Those of us who are Christians recognize that adultery is sin. I’m not defending it, excusing it, or pretending it doesn’t matter. But let’s examine the logic that Paxton can’t be trusted to do his job for a second… Saying a man can’t be trusted to honor his oath of office because he cheated on his wife is like saying a surgeon who commits adultery can’t be trusted to save your life on the operating table. Think about how absurd that is. Does breaking one commitment automatically prove someone will violate another? Of course not. And here’s something interesting… Angela Paxton filed for divorce citing adultery. Yet she’s publicly encouraged Texans to support the Republican ticket, which includes Ken Paxton. That doesn’t mean they’ve reconciled or that she’s excused his conduct. But it DOES illustrate that personal and political judgments aren’t necessarily the same thing. And despite Paxton’s personal failings, we still have an established record of what he’s actually accomplished in office. His office secured BILLIONS in privacy settlements against Meta and Google, prosecuted human traffickers and child predators, and fought numerous legal battles on behalf of Texas. That’s an actual record. One that includes accomplishments AND controversies. And no… his accomplishments don’t erase his failures… But his failures don’t erase those accomplishments. That’s why I’ve said from the beginning that we should evaluate the entire record… Not reduce a man’s entire public service to one aspect of this personal life. As Christians, we understand that ALL have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. We’re imperfect people voting for imperfect people. And here’s something else I’ve noticed… People have a bad habit of judging others by their ACTIONS while judging themselves by their INTENTIONS. When we screw up, there’s always an explanation… But when someone else does, suddenly that failure defines their entire character. A vote isn’t a valentine. If you believe Paxton violated his constitutional oath, then examine his conduct in office and make that argument. But don’t pretend his marital infidelity automatically proves he can’t fulfill his responsibilities as a public official. That’s an assumption… Not a conclusion established by evidence.