You can neither have too many bikes nor run too many PCR cycles https://xitter.cf/t.co/5BAJhYBb16
Joined December 2016
- Tweets335K
- Following4.3K
- Followers5.8K
- Likes36K
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
The vaccine saved millions of lives.
Thousands & thousands of unvaccinated people died who would have lived if they had the vaccine.
The lies and disinformation spread by anti-vaxxers was a large factor in people not getting the life saving vaccine.
They should be accountable.
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Is there evidence that dsRNA from vaccination can cause false positives in a PCR? Wouldn’t this result in activation of dsRNA sensing pathways?
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Dr. Bowden, this graph has a fundamental methodological problem.
It labels its outcome “sudden cardiac death,” yet includes death certificates mentioning atrial fibrillation, cardiac murmurs, cardiac arrest, unspecified circulatory symptoms, and ill-defined causes of death. Those are not interchangeable diagnoses of sudden cardiac death.
It also reports deviations from a modeled baseline, not independently verified, population-adjusted incidence rates.
And where is the vaccination-status linkage? Without it, how can the graph distinguish vaccination from infection, changing death certification, or other factors?
Vaccine-associated myocarditis is real and deserves serious investigation. But converting a heterogeneous collection of death-certificate codes into a seven-sigma claim of vaccine-associated cardiac mortality is not sound epidemiology.
Large population-based studies examining vaccination and mortality directly have not demonstrated the widespread increase this graph implies.
The statistical presentation may be impressive. The causal evidence is not.
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
You are going to see a lot of misleading info about Sweden's vaccine program.
Don't listen to all the misinformation out there!
This post by Alex Boge explains very well what's really going on over here.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 🇸🇪
This is exactly how anti-vaxxers manufacture misinformation.
They take one tiny grain of truth, wrap it in an enormous wad of complete bullshit, and inject it straight into the veins of a conspiracy-addicted audience hungry for anything that confirms their beliefs.
Here’s the grain of truth:
Sweden awarded its 2027-2028 COVID vaccine contract to a protein-based vaccine, instead of the mRNA vaccine it’s primarily using for the current and prior seasons.
Now here’s the bullshit:
The claim that Sweden is abandoning mRNA technology because of autoimmune reactions, uncontrolled spike protein production, serious adverse effects, and deaths.
What none of these anti-vaxxers will bother to read are the actual Swedish announcements and procurement documents.
They say NOTHING of the sort.
ALL of the bullshit you see on screen comes from the Dutch anti-vaccine website that took one legitimate fact, wrapped it in its own anti-mRNA propaganda, and packaged it for an audience of science deniers eager to swallow it whole.
So what did Sweden actually do?
It conducted a competitive procurement process that evaluated vaccines based on price and quality, specifically refrigerated shelf life. Those are the documented evaluation criteria, with absolutely no finding that mRNA vaccines were dangerous or responsible for the medical disasters alleged in this article.
And here’s the particularly revealing part:
Sweden’s official procurement system STILL lists Pfizer and Moderna as qualified suppliers for future COVID vaccine contracts.
Sweden is also using Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine for its current vaccination campaign.
So where exactly did the claims about autoimmune disease, uncontrollable spike proteins, and widespread vaccine injuries come from?
The anti-vaccine website. Not Sweden.
And that’s how this misinformation machine works.
Start with a fact. Bury it under a mountain of bullshit. Present the whole package as an official revelation.
Then watch thousands of people share it without ever checking what the original source actually said.
They don’t need the story to be true. They just need their audience to believe it.
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
How was it accepted in the first place without those baselines 🤣
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
This is why Nic Hulscher and Peter McCollough are not considered to be credible. Paper after paper gets retracted for crappy methods and reproducibility problems. It’s not a conspiracy against them. It’s just that they are dishonest. I’m still wondering what the heezy is Dr Drew doing on the paper? It’s like a veritable who’s who of quacks.
ar.iiarjournals.org/content/…
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Mazda is one of the dumbest guys on X who thinks he’s one of the smartest.
He still thinks Ethical Skeptic is a valid source! 😂
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
“Remedial take”? You’re mocking people’s IQs while demonstrating that you haven’t even bothered to read the original Swedish procurement documents.
And the irony of your “room temperature IQ” insult is particularly hilarious, considering REFRIGERATED SHELF LIFE was one of the actual evaluation criteria you apparently missed.
Your reply is yet another perfect example of how anti-vaxxers respond when their misleading disinformation gets exposed.
You claim Sweden is “not hiding their reasons,” yet the reasons you’re presenting DO NOT APPEAR ANYWHERE in Sweden’s official announcements.
The actual procurement documents explicitly identify the evaluation criteria: PRICE and QUALITY, with refrigerated shelf life as the quality criterion.
Absolutely nothing about rejecting mRNA technology because of autoimmune disease, uncontrollable spike proteins, or vaccine deaths.
ALL of that bullshit comes from the Dutch anti-vaccine website you linked, which wrapped a legitimate procurement decision in its own propaganda.
And here’s what makes your narrative even more ridiculous: Sweden’s official procurement system STILL lists Pfizer and Moderna as qualified suppliers for future COVID vaccine contracts. It remains open to mRNA vaccines.
Sweden awarded a specific contract to one supplier. You have provided no evidence of a separate decision to withdraw public funding from mRNA vaccines, much less any official finding that they’re unsafe.
You could have checked the original Swedish documents. Instead, you’re spreading an anti-vaccine website’s invented explanation as though it came from Swedish authorities.
Apparently, anti-vaxxers have to keep inventing reasons for things to happen in order to keep their narrative alive.
The truth was readily available. You chose to share the bullshit.
And one last thing about your “IQ north of room temperature” remark: It’s about 70°F in my room, so I suppose an IQ of 75 qualifies.
Given the quality of your argument, that’s probably accurate. But it’s hardly something you should be boasting about 🤣
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
This is exactly how anti-vaxxers manufacture misinformation.
They take one tiny grain of truth, wrap it in an enormous wad of complete bullshit, and inject it straight into the veins of a conspiracy-addicted audience hungry for anything that confirms their beliefs.
Here’s the grain of truth:
Sweden awarded its 2027-2028 COVID vaccine contract to a protein-based vaccine, instead of the mRNA vaccine it’s primarily using for the current and prior seasons.
Now here’s the bullshit:
The claim that Sweden is abandoning mRNA technology because of autoimmune reactions, uncontrolled spike protein production, serious adverse effects, and deaths.
What none of these anti-vaxxers will bother to read are the actual Swedish announcements and procurement documents.
They say NOTHING of the sort.
ALL of the bullshit you see on screen comes from the Dutch anti-vaccine website that took one legitimate fact, wrapped it in its own anti-mRNA propaganda, and packaged it for an audience of science deniers eager to swallow it whole.
So what did Sweden actually do?
It conducted a competitive procurement process that evaluated vaccines based on price and quality, specifically refrigerated shelf life. Those are the documented evaluation criteria, with absolutely no finding that mRNA vaccines were dangerous or responsible for the medical disasters alleged in this article.
And here’s the particularly revealing part:
Sweden’s official procurement system STILL lists Pfizer and Moderna as qualified suppliers for future COVID vaccine contracts.
Sweden is also using Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine for its current vaccination campaign.
So where exactly did the claims about autoimmune disease, uncontrollable spike proteins, and widespread vaccine injuries come from?
The anti-vaccine website. Not Sweden.
And that’s how this misinformation machine works.
Start with a fact. Bury it under a mountain of bullshit. Present the whole package as an official revelation.
Then watch thousands of people share it without ever checking what the original source actually said.
They don’t need the story to be true. They just need their audience to believe it.
🤖 Made with AI
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Are children of mothers who received COVID mRNA vaccines during pregnancy at risk for autism?
In the study, 50% of mothers received at least one dose mRNA vaccine, 50% didn't
434 children, age 18-30 months, were evaluated for signs of autism
NO LINK ‼️
uspharmacist.com/article/stu…
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
"why are you taking my temperature, will it tell you which infection I have?!?"
No it'll tell me if you have a fever
"SO YOU ADMIT IT'S USELESS AND YOU'RE A FRAUD!"
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Never underestimate the stupidity of a man who thinks he's qualified to 'rate' a woman's appearance.
Joe here, the Cillian Murphy of Margate, needs to book his hard drive in to be checked.
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
BREAKING NEWS FROM 1955!
The McCullough Foundation has apparently discovered vaccine safety failures that medical students have been learning about for seventy years.
Next week, perhaps they’ll investigate whether smoking causes lung cancer.
Yes, the Cutter incident happened. Children were paralyzed and died because improperly inactivated polio vaccine contained live virus.
Yes, SV40 contaminated some early polio vaccines. Scientists discovered it, investigated its cancer-causing potential, and eliminated the contamination. Subsequent epidemiological studies have not established an increased cancer risk from those vaccines.
And who uncovered these problems? Scientists.
Who investigated them? Scientists.
Who changed manufacturing standards to prevent their recurrence? Scientists and regulators.
The McCullough Foundation has taken seventy-year-old textbook material, removed the subsequent decades of research, and repackaged it as a shocking revelation.
The most embarrassing part is that they apparently believe the history of vaccine safety is evidence against vaccine safety.
Medicine learned from these failures. The McCullough Foundation seems determined not to.
Perhaps their next groundbreaking investigation will reveal that surgeons once operated without washing their hands.
Polio Vaccines Were Contaminated With SV40 and Nobody Knew for Years
Polio vaccines made between 1955 and 1963 were grown in rhesus monkey kidney cells and carried simian virus 40. MILLIONS received them before anyone knew. The Institute of Medicine reviewed it in 2002: evidence INADEQUATE to accept or reject a causal link to cancer — not the same statement as “safe.” And the 1955 Cutter incident put live poliovirus into supposedly inactivated vaccine and PARALYZED CHILDREN. Both found after administration. @RebeccaLambb
#MedicalFreedom
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
PCR is highly sensitive and specific. Symptoms should be taken into consideration for diagnostics. As someone who runs these things regularly at 35 cycles for DNA amplification you are NOT going to amplify something that’s not there
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
That's not what he claimed. In fact, it was the opposite.
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
He said a lot of things during his extralegal pharmaceutical research, AIDS denial, and getting paid to claim OJ didn’t do it. He was a complicated guy, and mostly a screw up except for a magnificent moment of genius. Even that he didn’t carry to fruition by himself.