CJI: you see how to reduce this gap of 43 lakh...we will take up after 2 weeks. one suggestion - [make sure] list is published telling that you are the 43 lakh persons who were earlier shown in so and so...that we have not been able to contact you, please see that you are able to contact us. Ask them to contact neaest BLO and fill form 8 J Bagchi: Enumeration forms will be enough. After final list, you are correct. CJI -Tell that Form 6 and 8 are still welcome. Keep on persuading people. Naidu: On field, experience is different. At best, 1-2 persons could have come...we will take steps in 2 weeks. meanwhile, time will also be enhanced J Bagchi -When you are going for SIR, your architecture is intensive. Delhi is a much easier turf for you. You got much bigger places (Maharashtra) Bhushan: In same press release, they have mentioned that 33 lakhs have been identified by system as no mapping. Where electors could not map with last SIR in 2002 and 19.34 lakh LD. They have never defined in any document what they consider LD J Bagchi: legality of LD we will go into greater detail later on Naidu: We have taken care of 95% that they are in J Bagchi: how do you reopen electoral roll of 2003? you can do on one-off basis. You have power, but as en masse exercise, your mapping from 2003 is understood, but what about LD of people already in 2003 list? you have created patterns. we have to examine whether creating of patterns is application of mind by human agency. Bihar SIR never considered LD. Because there were certain issues [...] we had permitted you to go ahead. It did not mean we had finally decided.