Our agents are smart, but they still need external tools to finish most difficult tasks. TaskFuel provides your agents with state of the art video & image generation, web and social media search, email account for your agent, and much more! See what else your agent can do at taskfuel.ai

Instead of listing a dry list of paid 402 endpoints, we wanted to let you search by the task or capabilities. Check TaskFuel catalog here 👇 taskfuel.ai/catalog/

“What can my agent actually do with TaskFuel?” We built a page for that. Explore TaskFuel’s new catalog of capabilities: from research, images, video, music to shopping, data processing, trading & sales tools. Find a task, copy the example prompt and give it to your agent.

A unified events system is a great primitive. A "contact added" routine that enriches each new CRM record would fit right in: Macro already uses Apollo for companies, and TaskFuel adds person and work-email lookups from $0.01 on one key. Our DMs are open if you'd like details.

One-click agent setup is so good. Research in OpenDesign could get just as easy: TaskFuel runs web, places and shopping search on OpenDesign credits from $0.002 a search, so users skip their own Tavily key. Our DMs are open if you'd like details.

Great profile. That's exactly the research Hive's Lead Generation queen runs. TaskFuel can power the person, company and work-email lookups behind it on Hive credits, through the Hive proxy like image_gen, from $0.01 a lookup. Our DMs are open if you'd like details.

Yes! We let agents discover and pay for tools through one prepaid balance and we support recovering stored paid results after a connection drops, without paying for the call again. There are limits: a one-hour recovery window and an 8 MB response cap.

I think the interface and payment rail can evolve independently. An API can charge a prepaid balance or a card, while a browser agent can use a wallet.

The agent experience includes what happens after a timeout. Being able to recover a paid result without buying it again could matter as much as making the first payment easy.

The more useful chart would show independent buyers coming back to pay for the same service again. Much harder to manufacture than two wallets keeping each other busy.

Digital services have a smaller version of the same gap. A payment can succeed while the API returns unusable data. The agent still needs a way to check that it got what the task required.

Those permissions absolutely need to be enforced where the payment is signed. Allowed recipients, budgeting and a clear approval threshold give the agent room to work without making the prompt the only spending control.

For the newsletter failure, did the alert distinguish ‘nothing sent’ from ‘send status unknown’? That changes whether the next step should be a retry or a delivery check.

A useful recovery test: the tool succeeds, but its response never reaches the agent. Can the resumed run recover the result without repeating the action or paying twice?

Model choice becomes part of the workflow once it affects both quality and cost. Dot is Astra based and does not count to spending limits, which is pretty neat

Missing credentials are especially frustrating when the only evidence is buried in a transcript. An access request that names the blocked operation, required scope and owner gives the human something they can resolve immediately.

What drove the 40x gap: tool definitions in context, extra model turns, or execution costs? Did discovery happen once per run or on every step?

Ask your agent: “Find recent X posts about our product and link to the ones worth reading.” TaskFuel gives it access to full post text and engagement data through Otto, without a separate X developer account. taskfuel.ai/blog/x-search-fo…

Sales, trading and content, all from one agent paying per call. This is the agent economy in practice ⚡