@TechFreedom

A tech policy think tank. We embrace change, pushing back against technocrats who fear it & reactionaries who would control it. Inquiries: [email protected]

Washington, DC, USA
Joined September 2010
.@BrendanCarrFCC is weaponizing the “public interest” standard against viewpoints he dislikes. Such jawboning violates the First Amendment, due process, and the rule of law. 75+ civil society groups & free speech experts joined us in this coalition letter 🧵
1
8
26
4,002
TechFreedom retweeted
The latest in Carr's ongoing effort to exert government control over political information & discourse. Today, former FCC officials issued a statement (supported by @TechFreedom & @protctdemocracy) calling his latest threat "a direct attack on free and fair elections." Link👇
During this election season, there has been a significant surge in entirely Fake Polls and Suppression Polls designed to do nothing more than interfere with the regular functioning of the electoral process and alter the normal patterns of voter turnout and enthusiasm. Many journalists and broadcasters have been amplifying or airing these Polls without regard to basic journalistic ethics and without informing the public that those Polls lack a scientific, accurate, or even real basis. The FCC takes these issues seriously. Broadcasters are prohibited by the terms of their federal licenses from engaging in News Distortion or promoting Broadcast Hoaxes. It is important that broadcasters comply with their public interest obligations. After all, the country benefits greatly when Americans can trust and rely on the media to report the news fairly and accurately. Broadcasters are advised to avoid engaging in News Distortions or running Broadcast Hoaxes by airing Polls that would violate their regulatory obligations. If broadcasters believe they should provide their viewers with additional context and information about Polls they have covered, they can now take those actions consistent with FCC regulations.
2
15
31
2,014
Congress enacted the APA for a reason: to prevent agencies from changing the law without even soliciting public input. @TechFreedom filed comments challenging the FCC’s expanded interpretation of political ad pricing rules, which would violate the First Amendment & admin law.
1
1
4
320
TechFreedom retweeted
Today Senator Blackburn is expected to try ramming KOSA--the Kids Online Safety Act--through the Senate via unanimous consent. KOSA was an Internet censorship bill in its inception, and in 4 years the only thing its authors have done is try to disguise KOSA's nature, not fix it.
15
128
26
334
58,909
How far can the government go when a president doesn’t like what a broadcaster says? On a new @TechPolicyPdcst, @TechFreedom’s @AriCohn and @BerinSzoka are joined by @TheFIREorg’s Bob Corn-Revere to unpack the escalating fight between ABC and the FCC.
1
4
1
8
911
18 FCC veterans of both parties support ABC’s First Amendment lawsuit to stop the FCC from jawboning ABC in retaliation for speech the President doesn’t like. Read the amicus brief we just filed with Protect Democracy ⤵️
1
2
6
453
Reagan’s FCC Chair, Mark Fowler, put it best: “Never in its history has the agency ever acted so corruptly and unlawfully to intrude on broadcasters’ First Amendment rights.”
2
3
4
102
Justice delayed is justice denied, and nowhere is that more true than when free speech is threatened. If the district court declines to exercise jurisdiction to stop Carr’s abuse of power now, the FCC will run roughshod over the First Amendment for years.
1
49
TechFreedom retweeted
The Safer GAMING Act would ban young gamers from even the most harmless communication—not to mention fun and strategic—in online video games, including nicknames in @Pokemon and taunts in @SmashBrosUS. This is lame. It also violates the First Amendment. My analysis in @reason:
5
1
22
1,292
TechFreedom retweeted
My first episode as host is now up
What if “harmful content” just means political beliefs someone disagrees with? On the latest @TechPolicyPdcst, new host @AriCohn sits down with @TaylorLorenz to unpack the free speech and privacy implications of laws like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA).
8
31
2,779
What if “harmful content” just means political beliefs someone disagrees with? On the latest @TechPolicyPdcst, new host @AriCohn sits down with @TaylorLorenz to unpack the free speech and privacy implications of laws like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA).
4
11
2
46
17,791
And last year, when Carr threatened ABC over Jimmy Kimmel's speech, we led a letter joined by 100+ scholars and free speech groups urging Carr to to cease what Sen. Ted Cruz rightly called "mafioso" tactics techfreedom.org/wp-content/u…
1
1
83
This is what we do best: We defend the First Amendment—and the statutory limits on agencies that check abuse. We build broad, bipartisan coalitions including former FCC leaders, top free speech scholars, and groups across the ideological spectrum committed to free speech.
1
59
Commissioner Anna Gomez continues to defend the First Amendment xitter.cf/AGomezFCC/status/20897…
I’m glad Disney has shown courage and stepped up. It is time this administration understands that the Constitution does not bend to political convenience, and that the First Amendment protects news and commentary even when those in power wish it didn’t.
2
2
267