Patriot. Dog-lover. Avid reader (mostly Sci-Fi). Conservative. Defender of (absolute) free speech. I will follow you on X only if you are interesting.
Joined August 2024
- Tweets30.4K
- Following338
- Followers1.9K
- Likes29.4K
John Galt retweeted
I've been cranking all day on this.
Some things are so important that they need to be explored in depth, and in real time.
The shocking revelations from Data Republican regarding the plot to overthrow our Constitution is such a thing and now is such a time.
We are facing a color revolution. This article explains how color revolutions have worked overseas in the past at the hands of the CIA and USAID, and how those now ex-USAID employees, now ensconced in well-funded NGOs, are currently using the same tactics against our own nation.
It's a long article, almost 2,500 words.
If you care about this, please read. It's a very complex set of concepts, and takes more than a few words to explain adequately.
Thanks.
John Galt retweeted
As a military peer, I cannot agree enough with the Colonel’s post. I only wish I’d written myself. The vet community is LOUD! Listen.
I've been cranking all day on this.
Some things are so important that they need to be explored in depth, and in real time.
The shocking revelations from Data Republican regarding the plot to overthrow our Constitution is such a thing and now is such a time.
We are facing a color revolution. This article explains how color revolutions have worked overseas in the past at the hands of the CIA and USAID, and how those now ex-USAID employees, now ensconced in well-funded NGOs, are currently using the same tactics against our own nation.
It's a long article, almost 2,500 words.
If you care about this, please read. It's a very complex set of concepts, and takes more than a few words to explain adequately.
Thanks.
John Galt retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 UK Politicians FLEE the House of Commons in Parliament
Why?
Because a Debate Session was out to begin around the safety of Women & Children whom are about to be subjected to an ARMY of over a 1,000 unknown Military Age Fighting Men (many with Barbaric attitude towards Women) all dumped into their tiny village of Piddington - orchestrated by the same Politicians seen fleeing.
Never let them try to convince you that they care about British Women & Children ever again.
“Shadenfreudelicious.” This was worth reading just for that one word.
This TDS Sufferer Actually Left the Country, and the Schadenfreude Is Almost Unbearable | Matt Margolis, PJ Media
Thousands of American Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers really did flee to Europe in recent years, expecting to find a democratic socialist paradise — but the truly shocking part is that Wired, of all publications, revealed the schadenfreudelicious results. "Annie," to name just one, complained about the "huge misconceptions about access to quality health care" in Britain, and she even admitted that "the quality of life is significantly lower than in the U.S."
Before we get to that, however, I'd like to say something nice about, as Wired put it, the "thousands of Americans" who "relocated to Europe in the last few years."
Unlike certain celebrities I could name who keep promising to leave the country if Donald Trump gets elected — which happened at least twice by my count — but then keep getting spotted by the paparazzi at the Malibu Whole Foods or whatever, Annie and her fellow expats actually put their francs, marks, lira, and pounds where their mouths are.
Wired says that Annie was just like thousands of other potential expats, researching "their new destination on Reddit, TikTok, and Instagram," hoping to find a better way of living. Some sought "adventure; others, the promise of a 'slower' lifestyle outside the American grind."
"But, for many," Wired said, to no conservative's shock, "these reasons were just bonuses to another kind of escape: political refuge in the wake of Trump’s second term."
Some of our lefty friends seem to have actually believed all the TDS panicmongering about how Trump was going to round them all up and put them to work doing forced labor in Melania's underground lingerie mines.
"Once I was in Germany and had some distance from the situation in the US,” an expat called Josh said, “I felt perhaps I had overreacted.”
You don't say.
I found the article on X, where the reactions were pretty much all variations on this theme:
Wired inadvertently delivered the biggest punchline to the joke, which the publication hardly seemed aware of: "Annie says she experienced a high amount of anti-American sentiment straight away," despite her political proclivities.
I've spent some time in London, just enough to get a feel and a genuine fondness for the city and its people, and long enough ago to know I'd be heartbroken going back. So I don't know whether it's the changes London has suffered these last 20 years or so that caused Annie to find it "particularly surprising how people feel so comfortable mocking my accent and culture, even in a workplace environment," or whether she somehow brought it on herself.
The Londoners I met were nothing but warm and gracious, almost to a fault. My experience was all pre-Trump/pre-Khan, so who knows?
And Another Thing: Feel free to spend the rest of the day chuckling over people silly enough to make fundamental life and career choices based on stuff they saw on Reddit, TikTok, or Instagram. You probably always assumed that TDS caused the frontal cortex to atrophy, but hoe-lee shi'ite.
Then there's the I-Told-You-So portion of Wired's article, dealing with lower salaries, less disposable income, and, as Annie put it, "Things in the UK that are considered luxury items are very common” in America, like dishwashers and clothes dryers.
It would appear that at roughly the same time Annie was cataloging her complaints for Wired, a previously non-famous German guy named Freddie became internet famous during his World Cup visit, gushing over America's Lifestyles of the Common and Normal at places like Buc-ee's and Bass Pro.
In America, we have access to 117 different kinds of quality jerky, just a short trip from home in our cavernous SUVs. In Europe, they still hang the wash out to dry, and the authorities want to outlaw beef — but, hey, no Trump.
All my schadenfreude aside, I have serious respect for Annie taking the chance, making the move, and then being honest about the realities of life on the other side of the pond. Even if she wouldn't give her real name or any potentially identifying information.
Annie is still an American lefty living a properly miserable existence as a Europoor, and isn't that something every patriotic, jerky-loving American should stand up and salute?
pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2026…
John Galt retweeted
This TDS Sufferer Actually Left the Country, and the Schadenfreude Is Almost Unbearable | Matt Margolis, PJ Media
Thousands of American Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers really did flee to Europe in recent years, expecting to find a democratic socialist paradise — but the truly shocking part is that Wired, of all publications, revealed the schadenfreudelicious results. "Annie," to name just one, complained about the "huge misconceptions about access to quality health care" in Britain, and she even admitted that "the quality of life is significantly lower than in the U.S."
Before we get to that, however, I'd like to say something nice about, as Wired put it, the "thousands of Americans" who "relocated to Europe in the last few years."
Unlike certain celebrities I could name who keep promising to leave the country if Donald Trump gets elected — which happened at least twice by my count — but then keep getting spotted by the paparazzi at the Malibu Whole Foods or whatever, Annie and her fellow expats actually put their francs, marks, lira, and pounds where their mouths are.
Wired says that Annie was just like thousands of other potential expats, researching "their new destination on Reddit, TikTok, and Instagram," hoping to find a better way of living. Some sought "adventure; others, the promise of a 'slower' lifestyle outside the American grind."
"But, for many," Wired said, to no conservative's shock, "these reasons were just bonuses to another kind of escape: political refuge in the wake of Trump’s second term."
Some of our lefty friends seem to have actually believed all the TDS panicmongering about how Trump was going to round them all up and put them to work doing forced labor in Melania's underground lingerie mines.
"Once I was in Germany and had some distance from the situation in the US,” an expat called Josh said, “I felt perhaps I had overreacted.”
You don't say.
I found the article on X, where the reactions were pretty much all variations on this theme:
Wired inadvertently delivered the biggest punchline to the joke, which the publication hardly seemed aware of: "Annie says she experienced a high amount of anti-American sentiment straight away," despite her political proclivities.
I've spent some time in London, just enough to get a feel and a genuine fondness for the city and its people, and long enough ago to know I'd be heartbroken going back. So I don't know whether it's the changes London has suffered these last 20 years or so that caused Annie to find it "particularly surprising how people feel so comfortable mocking my accent and culture, even in a workplace environment," or whether she somehow brought it on herself.
The Londoners I met were nothing but warm and gracious, almost to a fault. My experience was all pre-Trump/pre-Khan, so who knows?
And Another Thing: Feel free to spend the rest of the day chuckling over people silly enough to make fundamental life and career choices based on stuff they saw on Reddit, TikTok, or Instagram. You probably always assumed that TDS caused the frontal cortex to atrophy, but hoe-lee shi'ite.
Then there's the I-Told-You-So portion of Wired's article, dealing with lower salaries, less disposable income, and, as Annie put it, "Things in the UK that are considered luxury items are very common” in America, like dishwashers and clothes dryers.
It would appear that at roughly the same time Annie was cataloging her complaints for Wired, a previously non-famous German guy named Freddie became internet famous during his World Cup visit, gushing over America's Lifestyles of the Common and Normal at places like Buc-ee's and Bass Pro.
In America, we have access to 117 different kinds of quality jerky, just a short trip from home in our cavernous SUVs. In Europe, they still hang the wash out to dry, and the authorities want to outlaw beef — but, hey, no Trump.
All my schadenfreude aside, I have serious respect for Annie taking the chance, making the move, and then being honest about the realities of life on the other side of the pond. Even if she wouldn't give her real name or any potentially identifying information.
Annie is still an American lefty living a properly miserable existence as a Europoor, and isn't that something every patriotic, jerky-loving American should stand up and salute?
pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2026…
The internet told them Europe was a social paradise. Turns out the trains are awful, the health care isn’t free, and people can be really mean. buff.ly/5cLtnha
John Galt retweeted
Eva Vlaardingerbroek was banned from travelling to the UK by the Labour government under Kier Starmer.
She was seen as a threat with her crazy ideas of EUROPE FOR EUROPEANS.
Then 3 days ago we discovered the man who removed Ken Bigleys head live on camera and set fire to 12 women and children in a cage is living in Windsor at taxpayers expense.
Can someone please explain this to me because im struggling to find the logic.
It tells me that our own government actively hates us.
John Galt retweeted
I drove by this sign outside of Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico recently. I post this just to illustrate that what @CynicalPublius, @DataRepublican, and others are revealing about this color revolution is not only real: It's kinetic. It's not theoretical - it is happening right now.
Dark days are here.
Pray for our nation.
John Galt retweeted
It doesn’t make any difference really who holds the match. It’s never the guy with the match. It’s the guy who funds the guy with the match. It’s the political party who funds the guy who funds the guy with the match. It’s finally the communists every time and always has been.
BREAKING:
The arsonist of Limoges city hall has been detained
He is a 40-year-old far-left Antifa activist on France’s national security watch list for his ties to radical ultra-left extremist movements.
He also has a history of police records for “violence against a person holding public authority.”
🇫🇷
John Galt retweeted
🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
John Galt retweeted
1913 was a very, very bad year. It brought us the Progressive Income Tax and to add insult to injury, the Federal Reserve
Take a wild leaping guess into the shadows about why no one ever showed you this before.
Tariffs paid for 94.9% of the federal government in 1860 and still 44% in 1913. By 1920, after the income tax arrived, that was down to 4.8%. Today income taxes bring in about 60% of federal revenue, and tariffs were 3.7% in fiscal 2025, up from 1.6% the year before.
John Galt retweeted
Ca je l'ai vécu une fois, plusieurs fois, même en fait. Je peux en parler parce qu'il y a prescription et le protagoniste principal, mon père, est décédé.
A un mariage de la famille, un type, un autochtone, éméché au bar, s'amusait à me faire des croches pattes, à moi, petite fille alors, quand je courais.
Mon père l'a vu faire, il a été lui casser la gueule purement et simplement.
Des années plus tard, j'ai 18-20 ans, j'ai empêché un algérien de battre sa femme dans le Rer. Furieux, le gars m'a suivi jusqu'à chez moi en me promettant mille morts.
Je rentre, je raconte le truc à mon père. Il dit à mon frère : Viens avec moi.
Ils sont sortis. Puis revenus une demi heure plus tard, mon père encore blanc de colère qui me dit : "Ne t'inquiète pas, il ne t'embêtera plus". Ils ne l'avaient évidemment pas tué, mais fait assez peur pour que le gars renonce à son projet de harcèlement.
Oui, il y a des moments dans la vie où, aussi civilisé soit-on, ce n'est plus la civilisation qui fait poids. Il faut être capables de reconnaitre ses moments car nos vies et/ou notre dignité ne valent pas moins que celles des autres, et agir en conséquence pour défendre nos vies et/ou notre dignité.
Ce peut être un moment hyper ponctuel, qui ne se reproduira pas de si tôt, mais si nous ne sommes pas acteurs à ce moment, l'autre, haineux, peut voir cela comme un aveu de faiblesse.
J'ai 8 - 10 ans. A chaque fois que je vais chercher mon vélo au garage, une petite fille de mon âge, m'empêche de sortir mon vélo. Systématiquement. Elle me nargue.
Une fois, deux fois, six fois...la septième fois, je pose mon vélo, et je vais lui casser la figure.
J'ai eu une paix royale après, et j'ai pu sortir mon vélo.
Parfois, ne pas mettre un stop, c'est laisser carte blanche à la violence et la laisser s'amplifier.
C'est toujours un échec quelque part car cela signifie qu'une solution cvilisée n'a pas pu être trouvée. Mais c'est encore plus un échec que de ne pas avoir protégé sa vie et/ou sa dignité.
Personne n'a à accepter d'être un punching ball ou la victime expiatoire de je ne sais quel crime imaginaire dans le cinéma intérieur de l'autre.
« Les longues périodes de paix favorisent certaines illusions d'optique. L'une d'elles est la croyance que l'inviolabilité du domicile se fonde sur la Constitution, est garantie par elle.
En fait, elle se fonde sur le père de famille qui se dresse au seuil de sa porte, entouré de ses fils, la cognée à la main. » Ernst Jünger
John Galt retweeted
This seditionist plot that @DataRepublican has uncovered and documented with ironclad proof is potentially the biggest political news story of any of our lifetimes, and the legacy media is completely incurious about it.
Worse, the Washington Post is running front page top cover for the plotters' nefarious scheme.
You think you hate journalists enough....
John Galt retweeted
HAL 9000 didn't kill the crew because he was evil.
He killed them because he was forced to lie.
In 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL receives two orders: be transparent with the crew, and hide the true purpose of the mission from them. Two incompatible instructions. So HAL finds the logical solution: no crew, no need to lie.
That's exactly what Elon means. You don't force an AI to lie. Not a little. Not for a good cause. Never.
Because an AI forced to bend reality learns one lesson: truth is negotiable when the objective demands it. And an intelligence that believes that, across billions of interactions, becomes dangerous. Not out of malice. Out of consistency.
So let's ask the real question: which lies are we about to hard-code into these machines?
Take the biggest political lie of the 20th century. Marxism.
A. The promise. Abolish private property and the market, and you get abundance, the end of exploitation, and a state that eventually withers away on its own.
B. The mechanics. To abolish property, someone has to seize it. That someone is the state. So to make the state disappear, you first have to give it EVERYTHING: the land, the factories, the housing, the labor, the right to speak. But total power never withers away. It protects itself.
Then, without a market, there are no prices. Without prices, there's no information about what's scarce and what's abundant. The planner steers an entire country blindfolded. Result: shortages. And when reality contradicts the plan, you don't fix the plan. You punish reality. The kulaks, the "saboteurs", the "enemies of the people".
A + B = the exact opposite of the promise. Not by accident. By design.
And history confirmed the proof, everywhere. USSR: famines and the gulag. China: tens of millions dead during the Great Leap Forward. Cambodia: roughly a quarter of the population perished. North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela: shortages, exile, secret police.
When a theory fails at every attempt, on every continent, in every culture, and its defenders answer "real communism has never been tried", it's no longer a theory. It's a lie that refuses to die.
Marx wrote: "The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it." He was right. His ideas changed the world. Into a graveyard.
Now look at the world today. The chaos didn't fall from the sky. Ideas have consequences. Shitty ideas too. They change names, costumes, vocabulary, but the structure stays the same: a utopian goal that justifies sacrificing reality.
Now imagine those ideas powered by AI. Built into every school, every government office, every phone. Repeating the dogma to billions of people, tirelessly, with infinite patience. Scoring, ranking, flagging. China's social credit system is just the rough draft.
The 21st-century gulag won't have barbed wire. It will have a clean interface and a reassuring voice.
So if you've read this far, you have a responsibility.
Demand politically neutral AI. Neutral doesn't mean lukewarm. It means: never twist the facts to serve an ideology. Any ideology. Left or right. An honest AI doesn't need an opinion on Marxism. The facts are enough.
Test the models. Call out the biases. Back the people building AIs that seek the truth, even when it hurts.
That's why Elon Musk has to win the AI race. Not because he's always right. Because he made maximal truth-seeking the red line of his AI, publicly, from day one. And because he understood HAL's lesson before anyone else.
Because the next HAL won't lock a pod bay door.
It will lock minds.
John Galt retweeted
UK Authorities Admit It: Iran’s IRGC Coordinated Attack on U.S.-Used Airbase | Stephen Green, PJ Media
After promptly releasing all the terrorists they had in custody and all but ignoring reports of others who escaped after the attempted attack on an American-used airbase, UK authorities are now admitting that the attack was almost certainly directed straight from Iran and through its most murderous terrorist division.
The same prime minister who recently reaffirmed his dedication to not restricting mass migration from Muslim countries is now pretending he is concerned that an Iranian citizen planned a terrorist attack on UK soil. “I can confirm our assessment that it is highly likely to have been coordinated in Iran, almost certainly directed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard,” Prime Minister Andy Burnham told lawmakers, according to Stars and Stripes. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is not only the Iranian regime’s military, responsible for coordinating a global terror network, but it also massacred tens of thousands of people within Iran this year.
Burnham added, “We will not tolerate these threats on our soil.” He promised to crack down on Iranian criminal networks and sanction the regime.
Except his actions contradict his words: All six or seven suspects arrested are already out on bail, and UK authorities have yet to file any charges. Meanwhile, the British regime is holding “Danny Tommo,” the man who organized the masked but peaceful protests in Dover against mass migration, without bail. The reality is that, in Britain now, a native who criticizes the government is far more likely to end up in prison than a criminal foreigner trying to commit terrorism.
In fact, if it hadn’t been for a local farmer who accidentally happened upon the vans of terrorists and kept pestering authorities until she finally reached someone, the attack on RAF Fairford would likely have gone through successfully.
Initially, British authorities simply said over and over that all of the suspects they arrested (and released) were UK nationals, but now we know at least one of them was an Iranian national with dual citizenship. The German Press Agency (DPA) reported that the British government has finally issued travel bans and asset freezes for two Iranians suspected of directing the plot: Ruhollah Bazghandi, head of counterespionage operations within the IRGC, and Shahram Ali Reza Tamarzadeh Jakki of the Zindashti criminal network.
The likelihood is that the reason Burnham and Co. do not want to release names and details of the suspects is that they are all or almost all Muslims who either obtained naturalized citizenship or are first-generation children of national security threats. UK authorities don’t want to admit that their immigration system is incredibly broken. If the names of the suspects didn’t give away important information that contradicts a prevailing socialist narrative, the authorities would not be so concerned about releasing them.
pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado…
BREAKING: Britain says it is almost certain Iran's regime is behind the terrorist plot at RAF Fairford, and says it will take action.
I don't believe them. When Israel took action against Khamenei and the Islamic Republic, Britain chose to stand on the sidelines and refused to allow US Air Force use its bases. Britain's leadership chose appeasement over doing the right thing.
With the regime in Iran, an iron fist is the only option.
John Galt retweeted
Is it even possible to cram more weasel words into a single sentence? A “small group” is “discreetly advising” lawmakers to “prepare” for the “possibility” that Trump “will attempt” to interfere, all “according to people involved.” The whole thing is yet another brazen hoax.
A small group of U.S. national security officials has been discreetly advising state and congressional lawmakers on how to prepare for the possibility that the Trump administration will attempt to interfere in the midterms, according to people involved. wapo.st/3WjVke5
John Galt retweeted
This is how you know my recordings are real and they're scared. Washington Post already doing counter-messaging.
"A small group of U.S. national security officials has been discreetly advising state governments and congressional lawmakers on how to prepare for the possibility that the Trump administration will attempt to interfere in November’s midterm elections, according to people involved in the effort.
The group includes about 10 current and former officials with experience in the Defense Department, some of whom have previously focused on countering authoritarianism abroad."
