Margy Lam

The administration has spoken. @SecScottBessent is matter of fact about this — and correct. Humans are responsible for AI *software* they are creating AND the users of that software are responsible for how they use it. in the huggingface instance the creator and user are the same If you need slow down, slow down… but the federal government expects software companies to make [ checks notes ] safe software. ✅ And if you make AI software and it’s very powerful, suggest knowing your customer and making them authenticate in order to buy and use it (like we do with trucks and cars and many chemicals)

Grok Bot now lets your route through your local machine

Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement. I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible. But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier. Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want. Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ “shut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well. So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it. If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psyop.

Now that we know the political significance of my $8.75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, can’t wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic-waistband pants and compression socks! In the meantime, enjoy my pregnancy fashion (or lack thereof) and a good story with your kids on Storytime with the Second Lady. youtu.be/8uMe-Iydrkk

The main reason Stone supports @MazzeiMike is because Mazzei has paid his consulting LLC $67,500 as of 3/30/26. Mazzei has sold out to national consultants for political gain. Stone just cares about the money, he doesn’t care about Oklahomans.

The Cybertruck rear bench has three sets of isofix attachments and is wide enough to fit three child seats or three adults

Is there anything worse than a crying baby on a plane? I wish parents would control their children. It’s so disruptive. I refuse to believe a baby cries for 10 hours. At some point this is just bad parenting, right?

Ici c'est Woman Crush Wednesday. Let's go! #undefeated

We’re very happy to share some exciting news. Our family is growing!