Chirag Patil retweeted
I highly recommend cloudflare's security audit skill: github.com/cloudflare/securi…
Run it on all your software. Run it with the free models. Use it even if you used a model to audit something - it will find much more things. Works in all agent harnesses and is model independent.
Chirag Patil retweeted
When Super Intelligence solves all things
I'm updating my Linkedin profile to:
Built a Type III Kardashev Civilization
Chirag Patil retweeted
All plausible science fiction will be realized within our lifetime. If you’re reading this, you’re one of the luckiest humans to have ever been born (if we play our cards right.)
it’s clear we need to retire the term vibe coding because the models now produce better architecture & way more coherent code than an average software engineer.
perhaps even better than top software engineers too because unlike a human, ai has a much much larger context window.
this ain’t vibe coding at all. it’s precision engineering.
Chirag Patil retweeted
know who ELSE had badly written proofs with unconventional citations
Replying to @QuintinPope5
You may say "current AIs are poor contributors to the mathematical community because their proofs are badly written, they don't have good taste for new conjectures, don't cite well, etc."
I agree.
But I predict that fixing those issues will not make mathematicians like AI more.
Chirag Patil retweeted
One thing the engineering community will (re)discover is that every program can be ① hardened (edge cases squashed, inputs tightened, errors handled) and ② optimized (profiled, benchmarked, rewritten) basically ad infinitum.
There are real costs in every direction: time, attention, opportunity. You can literally explore input spaces that will never be hit or optimize performance of something that will never be used ("you have no users".) Even in an infinite token world, you need to know when to stop and what tradeoffs to accept. Agents will happily drill no matter what.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it" — Upton Sinclair
I think this quote explains a lot of the coping that's going on, but I also think it's wrong! The failure to understand is what'll erase the paycheck.
Chirag Patil retweeted
There were a lot of things that only worked because there's a limit to the rate at which humans can operate. We're about to find out what all of them are, as they break.
Chirag Patil retweeted
Underrated life advice: Become difficult to rush. The world will pressure you to rush into everything. Rushed decisions. Rushed relationships. Rushed conversations. Rushed timelines. There's power in rejecting that trend. Pause. Slow down. Create space to think clearly.
Chirag Patil retweeted
Delegate coding. Never delegate understanding.
If code was previously your source of truth for managing understanding, then you need a new source of truth artifact. If code-centric workflows were how you developed that understanding, then you need new workflows.
I am done with this shit. It is over. The state of engineering right now is horrible. It has been half a month since I started a new role at a big company. Nobody knows anything here. The specs, code, tests, PRDs, tickets, resolution of those tickets, reports, etc., everything is made by Claude Code. Nobody on my team likes this. They are being forced to ship as much as they can. I have heard multiple times from higher management that pushing code is not a bottleneck, so why are we slow? People are working 12 to 13 hours a day just to press enter. Nobody is reading anything. Humans in corporate are doing nothing on their own. Everyone, literally everyone, from an L1 to an L7 engineer here is doing the same thing. Talk to Claude. There is no sense of victory. Nobody is resolving bugs. In reality, nobody is thinking anymore. Everything is done by LLMs. It is so soul-sucking. I would not mind it, to be honest, if we were at least given the time to check out the code and see what is going where. But no, the goal is to just ship. No matter what happens.
Chirag Patil retweeted
This is insane try.cloudflare.com
Chirag Patil retweeted
hype-free explanation of jev:
jev does not replace gpt / claude
jev is just a *really* smart switch statement
like if 2016 ml classifiers got 2026 levels of intelligence
it's a new* type of tool that will make a lot of workloads insanely fast, cheap, and accurate
* = and by new, i mean rebranded
~~~
it needs a predefined set of options and it will tell you which one to take
it cannot:
- write code
- generate natural language
- reason step by step / show its work
- produce any output you didn't define in advance
- pick from more than ~255 options in one shot
but it can:
- classify, route, score, rank
- give confidence
- pick the right branch, tool, model, or sub-agent
- judge / verify / guardrail an llm's output
- label tons and tons of rows
~~~
i'd imagine a lot of workflows that look like:
llm proposes options → jev decides → code executes
and i see this fitting *really* well with code mode and mcp
~~~
implying this will lead to agi seems incredibly far fetched to me, but i don't want to discount the types of applications that this will make possible
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
Chirag Patil retweeted
If you even slightly entertain the thought of failure, you give your mind a chance to start noticing reasons to fail. But if the only option on your mind is to win, then the world seems to conspire in your favor, because your mind will notice opportunities it wouldn't have before. Become delusionally optimistic, not because it's realistic, but because it's effective. It drastically increases your chances of success.
Chirag Patil retweeted
I hope the proposals by frontier labs to pace AI research stem from a genuine concern for safety and a recognition of the potential risks posed by future models, rather than a strategic effort to consolidate power and permanently solidify the market dominance of a few top players.
If these efforts are genuine, then oversight must take a more democratic and accountable form, with both national and international components, similar to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency internationally.
If there is only one organization responsible for safety monitoring, and it happens to be staffed by the same people as the frontier labs, and it is perfectly aligned with them both by incentives and by ideology, then it would be indistinguishable from letting frontier labs self-regulate and self-certify their own safety standards.
Two potential warning signs of regulatory capture to watch out for:
1. Calls to ban open-source AI. Open-source development currently serves as the only real counterweight to the dominance of frontier labs.
2. Attempts to hinder non-frontier research. Models that are one or two generations behind the frontier -- whose level of capability has already been deployed at scale -- are empirically known not to pose safety risks.
As long as we don't see 1 & 2, and we see real international coordination efforts, then I will optimistically believe that the proposals are benevolent.
Chirag Patil retweeted
🚀 Introducing DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: smarter, faster, more efficient.
🔹 Introducing the smallest model in our new architecture family, with native visual understanding.
🔹 Designed for greater capability, faster inference, higher throughput, and scaling to larger models.
1/6
Chirag Patil retweeted
GPT 6 Astra is estimated to have ~1.2T Active Parameters and ~10T Total Parameters.
Reports indicate pre-training for GPT-5.5 (codename Spud) concluded on March 24 at the Abilene campus. Astra's pretraining run (Doug) would have taken over that cluster after that, OpenAI confirmed the math results were achieved by an internal version of Astra on August 1. So pretraining ran roughly late March to late June/early July, that is ~90–110 days.
Abilene's operational figure was approximately 150,000 to 200,000 GPUs as of May 2026, with inference sharing the site. So ">100k" for the run means 100 to 150k GPUs.
Around August 25, information circulated that OpenAI had completed a base model called "Bel" with over 10 trillion parameters, successor to Doug. Bel finished ~Aug 25 but Astra was already doing math Aug 1, so Astra is almost certainly on Doug, and Bel is a later model.
Compute for pretraining alone: 120k GPUs × 2.25e15 (BF16) × 0.30 MFU × 100 days ≈ 7e26 FLOP. Range 4e26 to 1.5e27 depending on FP8 and MFU.
Whole 100 days on pretraining, which is now plausible since RL ran afterward (the big RL run was restarted in August per Vellum/CNBC reporting).
Now the data wall does real work. Solve N_active = C / (6·D):
Tokens D N_active at 7e26
40T 2.9T
60T 1.9T
80T 1.5T
100T 1.2T
Realistic 2026 corpora with synthetic data and repeats top out ~60–100T, so active params land at 1 to 2T. Even at the conservative 4e26 end with 80T tokens, you get ~830B active.
Astra bills $50/M output at 62 t/s vs Sol's $30/M, a 1.7x price step, consistent with roughly 1.5 to 2.5x active params over its predecessor, not a 10x jump. Rough, but it argues against the >2T end.
Active parameters: ~1T–1.5T (central ~1.2T)
Total parameters: ~10–14T assuming 8–12x MoE sparsity (GPT-4's leaked ratio was ~6.5x; modern large MoE runs 10x+)
Replying to @ChaseLochmiller @OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra, trained on ~100K+ NVIDIA Grace Blackwell NVLink72. From ChatGPT to o1 to Astra in 4 years.
AGI has arrived. Congratulations @OpenAI team.
400K GPUs coming online next.























