Sovereignty retweeted
October 31st – November 6th, 2026 ift.tt/pua7Tqx Migrant Election Law won’t be Reconsidered; Benefits Out-sourced to India; SNP U-turn on Oil and Gas …. but first …. Should the Mummy Return … to Egypt? Following a request from Egyptian authorities, the mummified remains of the priest Nekht, recently removed from Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum, are due to be returned to Egypt… Read More »October 31st – November 6th, 2026
Sovereignty retweeted
On 18 November 2026, National Energy Action’s Fuel Poverty Awareness Day will shine a light on the scale & impact of fuel poverty on children & their health now and throughout their lives
nea.org.uk/what-we-do/campai…
@NEA_UKCharity @NEA_Cymru @NEANIreland #FuelPovertyAwarenessDay
Sovereignty retweeted
Young Shetland fisherman Tom Robertson speaks out on quotas, fuel costs, foreign fleets and the future of Scottish fishing? #FishingIndustry
Sovereignty retweeted
To read more about the new EnergyCloud project to use surplus renewable energy to help tackle fuel poverty on Shetland Islands with Hjaltland Housing Association, visit
hjaltland.org.uk/news/energy…
@scotgov @scotfuelpov
@EAS_Scotland #Shetland #Scotland
Sovereignty retweeted
6 NOVEMBER 1986 THE SUMBURGH HELICOPTER DISASTER. 40 YEARS AGO TODAY, 45 PEOPLE LOST THEIR LIVES IN THE NORTH SEA.
On Thursday 6th November 1986, a civilian Chinook helicopter was returning workers from the Brent oilfield to Sumburgh Airport in Shetland. On board were 47 people; 44 passengers and three crew. For many of the workers, it was a routine journey after a period of working offshore.
They were heading back towards home. But shortly before 11.30 am, tragedy struck. As the helicopter approached Sumburgh, its forward transmission suffered a catastrophic failure. The aircraft's twin rotors became unsynchronised and their blades collided. The rear rotor assembly separated from the fuselage, and the helicopter plunged into the freezing North Sea.
The impact was devastating.
45 PEOPLE DIED. JUST TWO SURVIVED.
A coastguard helicopter happened to be departing Sumburgh Airport at the time and was able to reach the scene almost immediately. Rescue crews, lifeboat personnel and other vessels responded, but the scale of the disaster was overwhelming. It remains the deadliest civilian helicopter accident on record.
The subsequent official investigation established that a catastrophic failure within the forward transmission had caused the accident. The findings contributed to further aviation safety scrutiny and changes intended to prevent similar failures. But behind the technical investigation were 45 individual lives.
Workers, colleagues, friends, husbands, fathers, sons and family members whose ordinary working day ended in tragedy. For families in Shetland, Aberdeen, the North East of Scotland and communities connected to the offshore industry, the disaster left a lasting mark. Offshore workers undertake demanding jobs, often in difficult conditions, and their journeys to and from installations are part of the risks of that working life.
Today, on the 40th anniversary, we remember the 45 people who died, those who survived and the rescue personnel who responded.
🕯️ FORTY YEARS ON THEY ARE NOT FORGOTTEN.
Sovereignty retweeted
MSP to lead partnership event at town hall on tackling violence against women shet.news/vqf1h via @Shetnews
Sovereignty retweeted
Those advocating a 🏴 return to the national sovereignty-cancelling EU:
“At its core, this is a battle over sovereignty in its most fundamental form: which legal order should prevail, the Polish constitution or EU law, when the two collide?” @battleforeurope
Delighted to debut in @Weltwoche with this piece about Donald Tusk’s EU-backed constitutional coup. In it, I explain that even though, at face value, this might seem like little more than a showdown between the government and opposition over control of the country’s highest court, it is actually part of a much larger power struggle within the EU establishment.
At its core, this is a battle over sovereignty in its most fundamental form: which legal order should prevail, the Polish constitution or EU law, when the two collide? In the past, the Tribunal has argued that the final word lies with the Polish constitution, not EU law — something Brussels has never forgiven it for. The supremacy of EU law over national law does not exist in any treaties; rather, it was created by the EU judiciary through a ruling made by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) known as Costa v ENEL in 1964. Since then, it has become the engine of EU “integration by law”: by constantly creating “laws” through its rulings, almost always in favor of “more Europe”, the ECJ has effectively become the bloc’s most important legislative and, indeed, constitution-writing body, thus hollowing out from above of national constitutional and legal systems. Alec Stone Sweet, an international-law expert, has termed this a “juridical coup d’état”.
A national constitutional court that rejects this principle represents an existential threat to Brussels. This is the real reason the EU was so adamantly opposed to Poland under the previous national-conservative government (and to Orbán’s Hungary for the same reason). This is ultimately what Brussels and Tusk refer to when they accuse the previous government, and the Tribunal itself, of having violated the rule of law. What they mean is that they dared to challenge the rule of Brussels’s law. This is the law Tusk wants to restore.
Sovereignty retweeted
Shetland aquaculture planning zones to quadruple in new Scottish government pilot
shetlandtimes.co.uk/news/the…
#eatmorefish #buylocal #supportUKIrishfishingindustry
Sovereignty retweeted
Economic Necessity? David Barratt’s Climate Justice Claim Doesn’t Add Up ift.tt/IxdtFc9
Opinion
By Laurie Moffat
•
30 October 2026
•
5 min read • 968 words
David Barratt MSP says overseas climate spending is an “economic necessity” for Scottish households. He offered no evidence that it lowers a single Scottish bill. Families who have watched jobs go at Grangemouth and Mossmorran deserve better than slogans.
On Tuesday 27 October, David Barratt, the SNP MSP for Cowdenbeath, stood up in Holyrood and told Scotland that sending money overseas for “climate justice” is “not simply a moral obligation but an economic necessity”. Helping communities abroad, he said, “is also an investment in our own resilience”.
It is a bold claim. It is also one he never backed up. He cited food imports, but not one figure in his speech showed how a pound spent abroad saves a pound for a family in Cowdenbeath.
The claim with no evidence behind it
Mr Barratt’s case ran like this: the UK imports around 40 per cent of its food, climate change threatens growers abroad, failed harvests push up prices, so funding projects overseas protects Scottish household budgets.
The first part is true. Defra’s own figures put UK home production at 62 per cent of all food in 2023, meaning roughly 40 per cent comes from abroad. The debate heard that the Climate Justice Fund was trebled to £36 million last session, with more than £10 million on loss and damage. How much has that knocked off a weekly shop in Fife? Nobody said. Calling something an “economic necessity” without a single number to prove it is not economics. It is a slogan.
Key Takeaway: David Barratt called overseas climate spending an “economic necessity” for Scottish households but offered no evidence that it lowers a single Scottish bill. Since 2025 Scotland has lost its only oil refinery at Grangemouth, and Fife has lost the Mossmorran ethylene plant. That is where Scotland’s resilience is being lost, and where it must be rebuilt.
A rounding error against the world
Scotland’s net emissions were 39.6 million tonnes in 2023, according to the Scottish Government. Global emissions that year were about 53 billion tonnes, according to the EU’s EDGAR database. Scotland’s share is about 0.07 per cent.
The money side is just as lopsided. The UN Environment Programme estimates that developing countries need between $215 billion and $387 billion a year for adaptation alone. Against that, £36 million over five years is a rounding error. It cannot move world food prices, so it cannot be sold to Scottish taxpayers as a cost-of-living measure.
The question he could not answer
The most revealing moment came when Labour’s Paul Sweeney asked him whether domestic producers face costs that competitors abroad do not, and how the coming carbon border adjustment mechanism would affect them. Mr Barratt’s reply: “I will be perfectly honest and say that I am not entirely familiar with that aspect, but I am happy to look into it.”
Honest, at least. But a member of Holyrood’s Climate Action Committee who wants to make the economic case for climate spending should know how climate policy loads costs onto the producers in his own region.
Fife’s bills, Fife’s jobs
Look at what has happened across the Forth and on Mr Barratt’s doorstep. Scotland’s only oil refinery, at Grangemouth, stopped processing crude on 29 April 2025, with 430 jobs lost. Scotland now imports all its transport fuels. In Fife, ExxonMobil shut the Fife Ethylene Plant at Mossmorran on 2 February 2026, with about 400 jobs at risk.
As a councillor, Mr Barratt put forward a motion recording “deep regret” at that closure and calling for support for workers. Good. But you cannot express deep regret at Mossmorran’s closure and then tell Holyrood that money sent overseas is what protects Fife households.
Food security starts on Scottish farms
Scotland grew 1.93 million tonnes of barley in 2025, keeps 1.65 million cattle and planted 13,400 hectares of seed potatoes. Across the UK we produce more barley, lamb and milk than we consume. What decides prices and security for those farms is close to home: fuel, fertiliser and electricity costs, the support farmers get and how we protect prime farmland. Those are levers Scotland can pull.
Sneers are not arguments
Mr Barratt told MSPs that the debate was “probably quite triggering for those who are on the right”. When Patrick Harvie remarked on people who accept that the climate has always changed but resist migration, Mr Barratt agreed and added: “There is probably a depressing crossover with flat earthers as well.”
Scots worried about bills and public spending are not flat earthers. They are asking a fair question: what does this spending do for us? They deserve an answer, not a jibe. The amended motion rightly called for transparency in how this money is spent. That is the least taxpayers are owed.
Real leadership
Mr Barratt said that “where we lead, others will follow”. Real leadership for Scotland is cheap, plentiful energy; secure jobs in energy, fishing and farming; and a sovereign wealth fund built from Scotland’s own resources, as Norway did. Sovereignty backs an all-energy approach. Our members agreed at Congress in Perth that Jackdaw, Rosebank, Cambo and other capped Scottish fields should be brought into production, so Scotland uses its own gas instead of importing it. Read our energy and resources policy.
And it means a fair tax system: our economy and tax policy sets out a Land Value Tax so Scotland’s land works for everyone, not a few.
Scotland first
Generosity is not an economic strategy, and overseas spending is not the route to Scotland’s resilience. Mr Barratt’s speech was strong on feeling and weak on evidence. Families who have watched jobs go at Grangemouth and Mossmorran deserve better than that. Independence, outside both Westminster and Brussels, means decisions for Scotland made by Scots, with Scotland’s resources put to work for the people who live here.
SOVEREIGNTY • SCOTLAND
Stand with Sovereignty
Join our movement for a truly independent Scotland outside both the United Kingdom and the European Union.
Join Sovereignty →DonateNewsletter Sign-Up
Promoted by Sovereignty (PP12666), Schoolhouse, Hamnavoe, Burra, Shetland ZE2 9LA.
Sovereignty retweeted
When the protests outside Holyrood begin the same media will report upon them conveniently ignoring the fact that energy policies are all the responsibility of the UK government talkingupscotlandtwo.com/202…
Sovereignty retweeted
Scotland has no powers over any of this. If we are about to be independent and build our new future then i think Scotland deserves to make something out of years of being robbed by WM
Revealed: How Big Oil lobbied Labour and SNP ministers over North Sea thenational.scot/news/266865…
Sovereignty retweeted
More powers for Scotland via devolution is all well and good; however, none of that compares to the powers of independence.
Sovereignty retweeted
Replying to @QuinanLloyd
Murrell confirming that @scottishgreens are just a safety valve to funnel and safely contain disaffected independence voters. Vote for real independence parties @IndyScotParty @VoteSovereignty @LiberateScot
Rule of thumb for voters: do nothing that criminal traitor suggests or hints you should do.
Sovereignty retweeted
Replying to @QuinanLloyd @theSNP
It astounds me why the @theSNP ever validated these figures by recognising them in any way, and even now that continues. GERS is a gross misstatement of Scotland’s true position as a colony in the Annexation Nation (UK) and bears zero consideration when predicting the fiscal health of a sovereign Scotland.
It is the single biggest stick with which the coloniser beats Scots, gaslighting us with the ‘too wee, too stupid and too poor’ calumny. Why @theSNP does not condemn the GERS is bewildering when it purports to represents Scots and the Independence movement.
I conclude that they currently merit no such right to represent this movement. I furthermore conclude that the current SNP leadership deserve outright hostility from us Scots in general and SNP members in particular.
It’s up to the SNP membership to ask hard questions of the current leadership on doctrine and practice. The rest of us? Find other means of expressing our will, including development and patronage of alternative political parties, examples:
@VoteSovereignty @IndyScotParty
@LiberateScot
I suggest this starts with the next local elections: 6th May 2027.
Sovereignty retweeted
The policy of both governments is destroying our economy, business by business, while bumping up inflation to everyone’s discomfort.
@VoteSovereignty has to campaign for the North Sea oil industry, and against Net Zero.
Sovereignty retweeted
Replying to @LustraSkye
Sovereignty retweeted
Heard the piece, @ruth_wishart .
Agreed, time to get off our knees.
John sounded like part of the British State.
The last thing Yes voters need at this time is a compliant @theSNP trying to make Scotland work better for our colonial masters.
@VoteSovereignty
Heard John Swinney on @BBCr4today. As ever, the voice of reason. But we've moved on in the Indy movement. Action bellows while warm words merely whisper. Time to get off our knees!
Sovereignty retweeted
It's good for the boss to call by.
@JohnSwinney, why acquiescence with our controllers?
Administering devolution is being a servant of the UK government.
Do something about independence!
@VoteSovereignty
Good to welcome Prime Minister @andyburnham to Glasgow today.
We will work constructively to improve the lives of people in Scotland, but that relationship must also be built on respect for Scotland’s right to choose its own future.
Sovereignty retweeted
It baffles me how many Scots claim to love 'their' land so much, yet own so little of it and have scant say in its stewardship.
This is full-blown Scottish Land Disconnect Syndrome - sold off to the highest bidders long ago, with most of us in denial.
Wake up. 🏴 – at Berlin, Germany





















