Meta has released Muse Voice Transcribe, taking the #1 spot for Final Transcript accuracy on AA-WER Streaming with 3.1% WER at 0.16s after end of speech Muse Voice Transcribe is the first streaming Speech to Text model developed by Meta Superintelligence Labs. Meta states that the model was trained on more than 70 languages, with 25 extensively verified, and supports audio inputs exceeding one hour without required post-processing. It processes audio in 80ms chunks and is available through the Meta Model API, Meta AI for Mac and Muse Code. Key takeaways ➤ Final Transcript: Muse Voice Transcribe achieves 3.1% WER at 0.16s after end of speech. It is more accurate and faster than Cartesia Ink-2 (semantic endpoints) at 3.4% and 0.43s, and more accurate but slower than Cartesia Ink-2 (external endpoints) at 4.0% and 0.07s. It is also more accurate, though slightly slower, than ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime at 3.6% and 0.14s. ➤ First Partial Transcript: The model achieves 3.6% WER at 0.13s, just ahead of ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime on accuracy and latency. It is more accurate and faster than Cartesia Ink-2 (semantic endpoints) at 4.9% and 0.17s, and more accurate but slower than Cartesia Ink-2 (external endpoints) at 4.0% and 0.07s. ➤ Price: Muse Voice Transcribe costs $0.18 per hour, or $3 per 1,000 minutes. This is below Cartesia Ink-2 at $4 and less than half the $6.50 charged for ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime and Deepgram Flux. See more details below ⬇️

Meta has released Muse Spark 1.2. It's their third release in four months and scores 54 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, significantly improving agentic knowledge work capabilities over prior releases and putting Meta next to SpaceXAI in a tie for third place amongst US labs Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) lands at 54, up 3 points from Muse Spark 1.1 (51) and 11 points from Muse Spark 1.0 (43, April). It enters effectively tied with GPT-5.5 (xhigh, 55) and Grok 4.5 (high, 54), narrowly behind current frontier models Claude Opus 5 (max, 61), Claude Fable 5 (max w/ fallback, 60), GPT-5.6 Sol (max, 59), and Kimi K3 (max, 57) Congratulations to @AIatMeta, @finkd, and @alexandr_wang on the release! Key Takeaways: ➤ Muse Spark 1.2 gets closer to the frontier on agentic knowledge work. At Muse Spark 1.1's launch, we noted agentic knowledge work as its clearest gap; Muse Spark 1.2's gains help to close this. Its GDPval-AA v2 Elo rose 260 points to 1631, #5 among all models we have benchmarked and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (max, 1588). Terminal-Bench 2.1 gained 2 points (78% to 80%), and Tau3-Bench Banking rose 2 points (25% to 27%) ➤ Among the most cost-efficient models at its intelligence level. Muse Spark 1.2 costs $0.40 per Intelligence Index task at Meta's unchanged $1.25/$4.25 per 1M token pricing, with only Grok 4.5 (high, $0.37) and GPT-5.6 Sol (medium, $0.39) cheaper in its intelligence cluster - GPT-5.6 Terra (max, $0.51), Kimi K3 (max, $0.86), and GPT-5.5 (xhigh, $1.18) all cost more per task. The cost increase over Muse Spark 1.1 ($0.29 per task) is driven by increased token usage per Intelligence Index task ➤ AA-Omniscience abstention rate increases. The score rose from 18 to 22 as the hallucination rate fell 10 points (38% to 28%) and the attempt rate dropped from 82% to 67%. This heavy abstention (not answering questions when unsure) now drives both the low hallucination rate and a lower accuracy (41% to 38%) ➤ Scientific Reasoning results remain largely unchanged. CritPt notably gained 3 points (15% to 18%), while SciCode fell 2 points (58% to 56%), and Humanity's Last Exam fell 1 point (45% to 44%) Other model details: ➤ Context window: 1M tokens, unchanged from Muse Spark 1.1 ➤ Pricing: unchanged from Muse Spark 1.1: $1.25/$4.25 per 1M input/output tokens, with cache hits discounted to $0.15 per 1M ➤ Availability: Meta's first-party API at launch